Advertisements
Home

Professional Race Baiter Claims the NRA is Racist – Noir Responds: – Bearing Arms

1 Comment

 

Al Sharpton,Jessie Jackson and Screwy Louie Farrakhan are the only so called Reverends that preach hate and violence against their fellow man. 

Noir went on to say, “I don’t know if he (Sharpton) forgot about that part of history or he just never cared to pay attention to it.”

Source: Professional Race Baiter Claims the NRA is Racist – Noir Responds: – Bearing Arms

Advertisements

Trump Receives Endorsement from National Black Republican Association

Leave a comment

This is from Young Conservatives.

Will the Establishment Republicans run Mitt Romney or Little Jebbie Bush?

They may even run them as presidential and vice presidential candidates.

Well, this new info about Donald Trump sure won’t sit well with the race-hustlers of the nation…

From BlackRepublican via GP:

“National Black Republican Association Endorses Donald J. Trump” http://blackrepublican.blogspot.com/2016/01/national-black-republican-association.html 

We, the grassroots activists of the National Black Republican Association, are pleased to announce our endorsement of Donald J. Trump for President of the United States of America.

As citizens who happen to be black, we support Mr. Trump because he shares our values. We, like Mr. Trump, are fiscally conservative, steadfastly pro-life and believers in a small government that fosters freedom for individuals and businesses, so they can grow and become prosperous.

We are deeply concerned about illegal immigration, a major cause of high black unemployment, especially among black youth.

Black Americans across America are beginning to wake up and see clearly the reality of what is happening in black neighborhoods. Democrats have run black communities for the past 60 years and the socialist policies of the Democrats have turned those communities into economic and social wastelands, witness Detroit, Baltimore and South Chicago.

We believe that Mr. Trump has demonstrated that he can push back against the mainstream media, end political correctness and free black communities from the destructive grip of socialist Democrats.

We urge our fellow black Americans to seize control over their own destiny and leverage their vote the way other groups do. It is way past time black Americans stop having their vote taken for granted by Democrats, hold politicians accountable for the content of their policies and not vote merely based on the label of their party.

What?

Black people supporting a racist bigot for president?

Can you imagine the look on Al Sharpton’s face right now?

Trump is racking up endorsements left and right (including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin), and he is still the frontrunner in the GOP race by a large margin.

Securing the black vote will be key in 2016, and Trump just cleared a major hurdle.

Black Shoots White Cop, Will Anyone Protest?

1 Comment

This is from Godfathers Politics. 

Where are the white people rioting and looting after a black thug shoots a white cop?

Oh, I forgot the white people are working to pay for the welfare that the black thugs get.

Forty years ago I applied for the local police department. I passed all the tests and physical except at the time my eye sight without my glasses did not meet the minimum requirement. I truly wanted to be a police officer at the time to help protect my family and community.

America has drastically changed in the past 40 years and given the same circumstances I would not want to be a police officer anywhere in the United States. Law enforcement officers are under attack by criminals, the media, racists like Al Sharpton and the Obama administration. If a white officer looks at a black person as a possible suspect in a crime, they are labeled as being racist. If a white officer is forced to use lethal force to stop a black criminal, blacks across the nation protest and threaten his life and in some cases the lives of the officer’s family.

Yet when a black person shoots a police officer, there are no protests, no outcry from the liberal media or civil rights organization. Will it be the same for Winston-Salem Police Officer Nicholas Wayne Powell, a white officer, who was shot by Gary G. Lynn, a black felon during a traffic stop?

Fellow Officer Adam Gardner spotted a car speeding and pulled it over at 1:53am. There were three black men in the car and when Gardner approached them, he thought he could smell marijuana, which is still illegal in North Carolina. He asked the three men to step out of the car as several other officers arrived on the scene.

Then Lynn jumped back in the car and started it up. Officer Powell went to the driver’s side and Gardner to the passenger side, trying to prevent Lynn from putting the car in gear, but he managed to do so anyway, dragging Powell for nearly a quarter of a mile. As Powell struggled with Lynn, the convicted felon pulled a gun and began firing. Powell was shot several times and somehow Lynn managed to shoot himself. Both men were taken to the hospital but none of their wounds are life threatening and Lynn was quickly arrested.

There are three points I want to make.

One is that after a black man shot and wounded a white police officer, there are no accusations of racism, no protests and no civil rights activists descending upon Winston-Salem and I doubt there ever will be. It seems that only a white person can be guilty of racism in today’s warped and twisted culture, but a black person can never be racist no matter how much they hate whites and act upon that hatred.

Two, Lynn is a convicted felon who was illegally in possession of a firearm. According to a North Carolina attorney’s website:

“‘Is there anything that can be done to allow me to own or possess a firearm.’ Until recently, my answer would always be, ‘No, there isn’t anything that can be done.’ However, as of late, our expungement statutes have changed, which have allowed some people who have been convicted felonies, which fall in certain categories, to be expunged from their records. This is one way for convicted felons to be able to possess and own a firearm again. This is also the ‘cleanest’ way to ensure that someone previously convicted of a felony (one that falls in the categories mentioned in the expungement statutes) can once again own or possess a firearm. A less ‘clean’ option to try and have your firearm rights restored is to petition the court for restoration of their firearm rights. The difference between an expungement and an order to restore firearm rights is that the expungement, which is allowed if someone meets all of the criteria, wipes the felony conviction off of the person’s criminal history; whereas, the order does no such thing. An order granting restoration overrides the statute which bans a person convicted of a felony from purchasing, possessing, or having any firearm. The restoration also removes the felony conviction bar on eligibility for a handgun permit and for a concealed handgun permit.”

“Who qualifies for this potential restoration of firearm rights?”

“A person with a single, nonviolent felony conviction, including multiple nonviolent felony convictions arising out of the same event and consolidated for sentencing, who has had their restoration of citizenship rights for at least 20 years before filing of the petition, has no other felony convictions, no misdemeanors involving violence and/or certain misdemeanors involving weapons, who has been a resident of North Carolina for one year or longer and has submitted his or her fingerprints to the sheriff of the county in which they reside for a criminal background check. If you meet the criteria above, then you can petition the court for restoration, however, it is not automatic restoration. There will be a hearing, where the burden is on the petitioner to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that they are qualified to receive the restoration and a district attorney may present evidence in opposition to the petitioner’s request.”

“While this petition to restore firearm rights is not automatic relief, it is an option for some people who have been convicted of a felony and do not qualify for an expungement. It should be noted, however, that this restoration by North Carolina does not necessarily lift a federal ban, which is a separate ban and another blog for another day.”

Lynn did not qualify for the restoration relief as his felony convictions involve weapons violations and robbery, therefore he was not legally permitted to be in possession of a firearm. No background checks or firearms laws kept Lynn from illegally obtaining a gun which only helps support the claim made by many gun rights advocates like myself that the gun control laws do NOT prevent the wrong people from obtaining a firearm if they intend to do so.

Three, with all of the police shootings, some justifiable and some not, more pressure is being placed on police officers to not use lethal force until it’s absolutely necessary. This is causing many officers to hesitate drawing their gun and in some cases that hesitation is going to get officers shot and possibly murdered. That may not have applied in the case with Officer Powell, but it will apply in more and more cases and we are going to see in increase in the number of police officers getting shot and killed in the line of duty for fear of being sued or charged with a crime for doing their job.

As Obama is about to enact more unconstitutional and illegal executive orders that violate the Second Amendment rights of every American, more and more criminals and crazies continue to obtain their guns through illegal means.

The shooting of Officer Powell demonstrates how hypocritical and racist black activists are and how ineffective gun control really is in stopping the wrong people from obtaining a gun.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/27708/black-shoots-white-cop-will-anyone-protest/#oSdVx04U0AlkDRFV.99

 

N.C. Police Chief Retires After Calling Black Lives Matter An ‘American-Born Terrorist Group’

Leave a comment

This is from Opposing Views.

 Surf City police chief Mike Halstead did not lie about the Black Lives Matters thugs.

 

   

A North Carolina police chief retired on Tuesday after sparking controversy with a Facebook post in which he referred to the Black Lives Matter movement as a “terrorist group.”

Surf City police chief Mike Halstead retired yesterday following an emergency town meeting called by the mayor to discuss a post written by Halstead, in which he said the Black Lives Matter movement was “nothing more than an American born terrorist group,” WWAY TV 3 reports.

“The FBI and other Government Law Enforcement groups need to step up and put a stop to this,” Halstead’s Sept. 3 Facebook post read.

“The Government and blacks would not tolerate the White Supremacist group to march through the streets and call for the murders of a race of people and a group of public servants,” the post continued. “I agree there is a race problem in this country. It is not brought on by police officer doing their sworn duty, it is brought on by the government, the President and his cronies Al Sharpton, who is a criminal tax evader (but has the support of our so called President), Jessi Jackson, Eric Holder and that ignorant S.O.B. Farrakhan who should be charged with solicitation for murder, lord knows a white man would be arrested for the same actions of idiot Farakhan.”

According to Town Manager Larry Bergman, the post was written in response to a recent event.

“He felt pretty passionate about it,” Bergman told WWAY. “Someone had just been murdered in Texas and [the Facebook post] was in relation to that incident.”

Halstead’s retirement was accepted by the town council and is effective immediately. He will be paid 60 days severance. The post, according to Bergman, violated a department policy relating to how the chief presents himself publicly.

“Personal postings are not allowed,” Bergman said.

Many residents expressed concern over the post, but military police officer Andrew Vann told WWAY that he agrees with the chief’s message.

“In my personal experience, when you put on a badge or a uniform, that’s what people see,” he said.

“They don’t see your color,” he added. “They see the blue or the black, and that’s how the majority of police officers act, and he’s been in law enforcement for 35 years. He didn’t get there by riding the rails or hiding behind someone else.”

Sources: My Fox 8, WWAY

 

Sheriff Clarke furious at deputy’s murder; who really started the ‘war on police?’

Leave a comment

This is from BizPac Review.

I can answer  Sheriff  Clarke’s question the people who are responsible for the war on the police are as follows.

Barack Obama,Jessie Jackson,Al Sharpton,Eric Holder and Louis Farrakhan.

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. laid it out for Judge Jeanine Pirro in an interview Saturday, and he wasn’t holding back.

Saying he was “too pissed off to be diplomatic” about Friday’s ambush and murder of a uniformed deputy sheriff in Houston, Clarke blamed the White House for the “war on police.”

On Saturday, authorities announced the arrest of Shannon J. Miles, 30, a man with a criminal record, in the shooting death of Harris County Deputy Darren Goforth. Charged with capital murder, Miles could face the death penalty.

“I said last December that war had been declared against the American police officer, led by some high-profile people,” Clarke told Fox News host Jeanine Pirro on “Justice With Judge Jeanine” Saturday.

“One of them coming out of the White House, another one coming out of the United States Department of Justice. And it’s open season right now, there’s no doubt about it.”

Clarke referred to members of the Black Lives Matter movement who chant “No justice, no peace” as “black slime that needs to be eradicated from the American society.”

Pirro observed that “without leadership … people seem to be emboldened by this kind of thing.”

“Right,” Clarke said. “And that’s why I said the president of the United States started this war on police.”

Watch the interview, via Fox News.

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/08/30/sheriff-clarke-furious-at-deputys-murder-who-really-started-the-war-on-police-245114#ixzz3kMXP1bSE

 

embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTpLS9Us4yI[/embed]

Killer’s manifesto? TV gunman sent bizarre message to ABC after murders

Leave a comment

This is from Fox News.

Any bets on the fact he came from a home without a father.

Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louise Farrakhan, Eric Holder and Barack Obama are as responsible for these murders as if had pulled the trigger.

They have preached anti white rhetoric and the victim hood of blacks to the point we are seeing the beginnings of a race war.

The man who killed a reporter and her cameraman on live television Wednesday is believed to have sent a chilling manifesto to ABC News hours later, calling himself a “human powder keg” and detailing a long list of grievances.

Vester Lee Flanagan, who killed himself along a Virginia highway some time after allegedly faxing the 23-page manifesto to the network news office, blamed his rage on the June 17 shootings of nine black worshipers in a Charleston, S.C., church, grievances he had while working as a reporter with the two victims and discrimination he faced as a gay black man.

“Why did I do it?” read the fax purportedly from Flanagan, who reported for the WDBJ-7 under the name Bryce Williams. “I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15.”

The fax came in at 8:26 a.m., some two hours after reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward were gunned down in in Moneta, Va. In it, the writer claimed that the initials of the Charleston victims were scratched onto the bullets used Wednesday. The frightening missive also praised Virginia Tech gunman Seung Hui Cho, calling the man who killed 32 people in a 2007 rampage in Blacksburg, “my boy.”

“Yes, it will sound like I am angry … I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace….”

Shortly after ABC received the fax, a man claiming to be “Bryce” called the station and said he had shot two people. He apparently told the station that police were after him and hung up. ABC News said it contacted authorities.

Authorities are investigating the manifesto and have not confirmed its author. ABC News said Wednesday that a man claiming to be Bryce Williams called repeatedly weeks ago, saying that he wanted to pitch a story and needed fax information.

The 41-year-old gunman, who died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, was from California, studied broadcast journalism at San Francisco State and– after working in various media roles– joined WDBJ7 as a multimedia journalist in March 2012. A LinkedIn profile for Bryce Williams showed he worked for the station from March 2012 to February 2013.

WDBJ general manager Jeffrey Marks said Flanagan had a reputation as being an unhappy man who was difficult to work with. Marks says Flanagan was fired after “many incidents of anger.” He said when Flanagan was fired, the station had to call police to escort the man out of the office. A Twitter account linked to Flanagan included accusations that Parker had made racist comments in his presence and Ward had complained about him to human resources, accusations Marks said were not founded.

“We think they were fabricated,” the station manager said. Marks said Flanagan alleged that other employees made racially tinged comments to him, but that his EEOC claim was dismissed.

Dan Dennison, now a state government spokesman in Hawaii, was the WDBJ news director who hired Flanagan in 2012 and fired him in 2013.

“We did a thorough investigation and could find no evidence that anyone had racially discriminated against this man,” Dennison told the Associated Press. “You just never know when you’re going to work how a potentially unhinged or unsettled person might impact your life in such a tragic way.”

Parker and Ward were doing a local tourism story at an outdoor shopping mall. The shooting aired live, capturing Parker’s screams of “Oh my God,” as she fell. Ward fell, too, and the camera he had been holding on his shoulder captured a fleeting image of the suspect holding a handgun.

WDBJ quickly switched back to the anchor at the station, her eyes large and jaw dropping as she said, “OK, not sure what happened there.” The station later went live again, reporting on their own station and staff as the story developed.

But Flanagan himself also videotaped the shooting, holding a cellphone as he carried out the methodical murders. His video was later posted on Twitter and Facebook pages registered to “Bryce Williams,” showing the shooter walking up to the victims and standing a few feet away while holding the weapon. The three, in the midst of a live TV interview, do not seem to notice the gunman, who doesn’t start shooting until Ward points the camera at Parker and her interview subject.

Parker is then seen screaming and scrambling in vain to get away as roughly 15 shots are be heard, including several that were fired after the video goes dark.

 

Slavery Reparation Demands are Pure Entitlement Nonsense

Leave a comment

This is from Patriot UpDate.

Blacks have gotten reparations since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society.

It is called welfare and food stamps.

 

“So you think that people who never owned slaves should be required to pay reparations to people who never were slaves.” This was a comment made by an individual in a class I taught recently in which the issue of slavery reparations was raised. Interestingly, the individual who made this comment is black and the one who proposed reparations is white. Reparations are an ill-conceived concept advocated by people who think they are owed because blacks were once enslaved in America. Those pushing for reparations are predictable: Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton are two of the most vocal advocates. In fact, Farrakhan has gone beyond the borders of the United States with his reparations road show.

Failing to gain any traction in America for slavery reparations, Louis Farrakhan took his entitlement message to the Caribbean last year. In Jamaica he demanded that the Pope endorse slavery reparations to atone for the supposed sins of the Catholic Church. “Project 2019” is a white paper that sets out the case for slavery reparations to be paid by taxing U.S. citizens (although its author admits that seeking reparations is probably a waste of time and effort that could be put to better use in other causes for black Americans).

Reparation demands will probably be with us for a while because they grow out of the entitlement mentality that has become deeply engrained in so many Americans. But demands for slavery reparations are just that: pure entitlement nonsense. In fact, they are an example of race hustling at its worse. Americans of good will are working hard to bridge the racial gap that still exists in our country and bring about a state of racial harmony; something that would benefit Americans of all races. Unfortunately, there are still a few people who view racial discord as an opportunity to be exploited—think of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton—people best viewed as race hustlers. Race hustlers continue to fan the flames of racial discord as a means to keep themselves relevant, maintain power, and fatten their wallets. The biggest fear of race hustlers is that people in America will do what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. recommended: judge people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. If this ever happens the days of race hustling are over.

Fearing exactly this, race hustlers have long sought a way to really pour fire on the embers of racial discord. The more progress people of good faith make in bridging the racial divide in America, the more frantic race hustlers have become in seeking a burning issue that will ensure them of more years, if not decades, of relevance and financial security. The more entrepreneurial of the race hustlers think they have hit upon just the issue: slavery reparations. As race hustles go, this one must look inviting to people who benefit from racial discord because it appeals to them on so many different levels. There are the feelings harbored by some black Americans who know their history and understandably resent aspects of it, there is the growing entitlement mentality in American society, there is white guilt, and, finally, there is the always enticing element of money.

My view is that those who captured, transported, traded, and owned slaves should have been made to pay reparations to those they enslaved 150 years or so ago when slaves and masters were still alive. Reparations assessed at that time would not have erased the blight on humanity that slavery represented, but they would have at least been an attempt at justice. Speaking of justice, this is why I disagree advocates of slavery reparations who want American citizens alive today to be taxed to pay reparations to black Americans. If the goal of reparations is justice, where is the justice in asking Americans who are living today to pay for the sins of Americans who died long ago, sins they played no part in and owing to the span of time involved could not have stopped? How can a person alive today possibly be culpable for sins committed 200 or more years ago?

Further, what about Hispanic and Asian Americans? Should they be required to pay? What about Americans of mixed racial heritage? Should they be required to pay? What about the fact that a high percentage of Americans living today trace their lineage to immigrants who came to America after the Civil War? Should they be allowed to pay? What about descendants of black people who themselves owned slaves? Should they be required to pay? What about descendants of white Americans who helped slaves escape bondage? Should they be required to pay?

To race hustlers, slavery reparations must look like a promising issue on which to hang their hats, not to mention their wallets. Their thinking probably goes something like this: If we make enough noise about this issue and stir up enough guilt, maybe pandering politicians will go along with reparations just to shut us up. But on more careful consideration, the idea of reparations is not just fraught with difficulties; it is the result of twisted logic, entitlement, and greed. Society cannot right one wrong by perpetrating another. You do not establish justice for one man by inflicting injustice on another.

Look into this issue and you will notice right away that slavery reparations advocates do not limit their expectations of payment to just the direct descendants of slave traders and slave owners. This is not because they acknowledge that even direct descendants played no role in the heinous activities of their forbearers. The descendants of slave owners and slave traders weren’t even alive in those dark days of America’s history, nor would they be for a long time. Obviously, people cannot be held responsible—legally, ethically, or morally—for things they did not do and could not prevent. But this is not why reparations advocates choose not to focus on the descendants of slave traders and slave owners. The real reason is the very essence of expedience: money. There are not enough direct descendants of slave traders and slave owners alive in America today to generate the kind of money advocates are hoping to receive. Better for the pocketbooks of race hustlers if all Americans have to pay into the proposed fund and let justice be damned.

Another important question is this: Who would administer a reparations fund? Actually, reparations advocates have already answered this question. The plan is to ask “black leaders” to administer the reparations fund and make decisions concerning how to distribute any money that would be collected. Now there’s a plan. Besides this approach being a formula certain to encourage cronyism, graft, and corruption—that much power coupled with that much money is certain to corrupt, just look at Congress—who is going to choose the black leaders to administer the fund and who is going to oversee their decisions?

Slavery was an abomination, not just to America but to humanity. I state this as a given. However, expecting reparations to be paid by people who did not live during the slavery era, have never owned slaves, and in all likelihood are not even distantly related to slave owners of the past is a bad idea; an idea that is not fair, just, or logical. In fact, the demand for slavery reparations is little more than an example of the entitlement mentality run amok and being pushed by people who are interested in receiving money they don’t deserve from people who don’t owe it to them.
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/slavery-reparation-demands-are-pure-entitlement-nonsense/

HPD officer shot in back during traffic stop expected to make full recovery

Leave a comment

This is from Click 2 Houston.com.

Barack Obama, Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton and the Obama Media share the blame for the hostile environment that led to this shooting in Houston. 

A Houston police officer is recovering after being shot in the back during a traffic stop in Midtown Tuesday evening. Houston police are now looking for the shooter. Mark Boyle reports.

HOUSTON –A Houston police officer is recovering after being shot in the back during a traffic stop in Midtown Tuesday evening.

Officer Terry Smith and another motorcycle unit officer were conducting traffic duties in the 4200 block of Main Street, across from Sears, around 6 p.m.

The driver Smith pulled over had already left the scene and the officer was chatting with the other motorcycle officer.

At some point, a shot was fired in the direction of the officers and Smith was struck in the back.

“The officer was putting away his ticket book and stuff he needed for the traffic stop,” HPD Capt. Dwayne Ready said. “He was leaning over into his saddlebag when they heard the pop and it was shortly thereafter that he felt pain.”

Just before the shooting, both officers saw a champagne-colored Buick, believed to be involved in an accident with a white Jeep minutes before, pull into the parking lot.  The driver was a man and the passenger was a pregnant woman.  They both fled after shots were fired.

Officers are gathering surveillance footage from nearby cameras, hoping to find evidence that could lead them to the mysterious shooter.

“We’re on the hunt for videos as well as other evidence,” Ready said.

The shooting happened next to a busy METRO rail line, but investigators said they think the shooter was in a car.

“We believe at this time, since there wasn’t a lot of foot traffic, it’s got to be a passing vehicle that fired the rounds,” Ready said.

HPD Chief Charles McClelland said Smith underwent surgery and is in good condition. McLelland said Smith is expected to make a full recovery. Several officers and family members were at Memorial Hermann Hospital to support Smith.

“A small-caliber projectile (was) lodged in his frontal stomach area,” McClelland said.

The bullet did not hit any of Smith’s vital organs. Smith is a 20-year HPD veteran and father of six children.

McClelland’s concern is that police don’t know why Smith was shot.

“This is particularly troubling because we don’t know how it happened, why it happened at this point,” he said. “We’re still gathering those facts.”

Mayor Annise Parker joined McClelland fellow officers and family members who rallied to Smith’s side as he went into surgery.

“We were pleased to learn that he was awake and alert and communicating when he came in, but they moved him to surgery,” Parker said.

McClelland and Parker said they don’t know yet if Smith was targeted or whether the shooting is connected to tensions between officers and the public in other parts of the country.

Douglas Griffith, the vice president of the Houston Police Officer’s Union, said he is concerned about these possibilities.

“All over the nation you see attacks on police officers for no apparent reason other than they’re wearing a uniform,” Griffith said. “It saddens me.”

 

Police forced to do something APPALLING after Boston terror shooting

Leave a comment

This is from Allen B. West.com.

Barack Obama, Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton and Eric Holder built this distrust and hatred of the police.

Damn them.

Whether we want to admit it or not, islamic jihadism and terrorism is here amongst us. There are no borders or boundaries to this battlefield and with the proliferation of social media, the tentacles of savage barbarism first unleashed by Mohammad have an unbelievably wide reach. How incredibly ironic that we have been debating the issue of domestic surveillance when this latest jihadist plot was uncovered.

As we reported yesterday, and Fox News now details, “The man shot and killed Tuesday by Boston police was plotting with another suspect to behead a cop, according to a law enforcement source. The dead suspect, 26-year-old Usaama Rahim, was under surveillance by the Joint Terrorism Task Force, which is comprised of state, local and federal law enforcement agents, when he was shot at about 7 a.m. near a CVS in the city’s Roslindale neighborhood, when he brandished the blade at police.”

 “Later Tuesday, authorities arrested another suspect, David Wright, in connection with the case, police said. “We believe the intent was to behead a police officer,” one official told The Boston Globe. “We knew the plot had to be stopped. They were planning to take action Tuesday.”

“Rahim, Wright and an unidentified third person met Sunday on a Rhode Island beach to discus plans, the affidavit, which was released Wednesday, said. Wright, who waived his Miranda rights, told the FBI the plans included an attack on a victim in another state, the court papers said.”

And by the way, that “victim in another state” is apparently Pamela Geller, who organized the Mohammed cartoon contest in Garland, Texas.

Hours prior to the shooting, Rahim told Wright he had changed plans and was going to “go after” the “boys in blue,” the court papers said.

This of course reminds us of the attack in New York City against two NYPD officers by an axe-wielding jihadist who was shot dead — who could forget the video images of his closing in for his strike?

However, what I saw on Wednesday gave me cause for greater concern. It appears that in America there are those who have learned in the case of a law enforcement shooting, the false narrative has to be promulgated.

In this case, there were family members of Rahim who immediately began to spread the lie that he was shot in the back three times while on a cell phone. And horribly enough, there were those in the community who immediately became skeptical. Not only have we entered into the realm of constant jihadists attacks, but we’re also now in a state of dysfunction where law enforcement is put on the defense.

It was very telling that the Boston Police Commissioner had to hold a special viewing of a video that detailed the incident surrounding the shooting of Rahim for community “leaders” such as the Urban League and Muslim clerics. Hat tip to the Boston Police Department Commissioner who clearly understands the new normal and defused a situation before Al Sharpton showed up in Boston and started ranting “Cell Phone hang up, don’t shoot.” I’m glad the Task Force personnel had the smarts to video the engagement so as to put all rumor and innuendo to bed.

All across America, we’re seeing the result of the persecution and distrust of our law enforcement officers. Violent crimes are up in just about every major urban center. Therefore, if there were a time for Islamic jihadists to strike – particularly black ones — it would be now.

Sure, I don’t agree with the massive metadata collection but what are we going to do? Somehow our law enforcement officers tracked, monitored and were able to confront and kill Rahim who had a nefarious intent. And in waiving his Miranda rights, Wright appears to have no remorse about the plot he intended to unleash.

But what if this plot was not aimed toward a law enforcement officer but rather just an innocent citizen — which as been the case in Australia. How do we protect ourselves on this modern borderless battlefield?

We are restraining ourselves through political correctness. We are restraining ourselves by allowing the enemy to hide in plain sight turning our liberties against us. We are demonizing our law enforcement — granted, there are bad apples in any bushel.

But are our domestic rules of engagement worse than those on the distant battlefields? I always hear people speak out against “profiling” — well, I prefer to term it as “trend analysis” — but for instance, Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Usaama Rahim had something in common — the same Islamic center in Boston. It’s not profiling, it is good investigative work to connect the dots. Look, I don’t want to know the exact TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) used to track down Rahim leading to the confrontation. I’m glad he wasn’t wounded but shot dead – I’m sick of these bleeding heart trials, and covers on Rolling Stone celebrating jihadists.

I think we should all consider the neutering of our law enforcement officers, especially in the heavily populated urban centers. It will be very hard for jihadists to launch an attack in “flyover country America.” But in the inner cities they’re able to blend in and execute their heinous actions. If we continue down the path of making our law enforcement tentative — just the same as in the combat zone restrictive ROE cause troops to hesitate — nothing good will result.

It was a sad day to watch the Police Commissioner of Boston, which has already suffered one horrific Islamic terrorist attack, forced to show a video to prove they acted correctly. Then again, it was President Obama who first castigated law enforcement officers in Cambridge, Massachusetts as “acting stupidly” — and thus the declining respect and regard for our police began.

Today’s black leaders ‘worse than KKK, skinheads combined’

Leave a comment

This is from World Net Daily.

The decline of the black family started with Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society.

Then the race baiter twins Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton and now Barack Obama are finishing the demise of the black families.

We may ‘continue to be divided for another 50 years’

baltimore_riots

Rioting in Baltimore in response to the death of Freddie Gray

Baltimore is in crisis. Violent crime is surging. Police are afraid to chase crooks, because they fear for their jobs. And State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby, who filed charges against six officers in the death of Freddie Gray, is partying with pop stars even as her case falls apart.

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson calls it nothing less than a “betrayal” of the civil-rights movement and says the situation in Baltimore illustrates how African-Americans are worse off than they were 50 years ago.

And he’s not hesitant to pin the blame.

“Modern-day civil-rights leaders are the worst enemy of black Americans,” he charged. “These black ‘leaders’ are worse than the Ku Klux Klan and skinheads combined.”

More than 50 people have been shot in Baltimore since the city was gripped by riots and disorder following the death of Freddie Gray. Homicides are up from last year after last weekend’s wave of shootings. There are even safety concerns for the upcoming Preakness horse race in Baltimore Saturday.

And Mosby may be jeopardizing her case against the police officers by her political grandstanding, legal tactics and appearance with pop star Prince on stage during a tribute concert to Freddie Gray.

Get all the details of the fight over race, in “Scam: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America.”

Some of the violence in the Baltimore area even has taken on racial overtones, notably in the case of an elderly white man savagely attacked by a mob of black youths. But most of the victims of crime and political incompetence in Baltimore are African-Americans.

Peterson, author of “Scam: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America,” pins the blame for the Baltimore disaster firmly on those “civil rights leaders.”

He said the KKK comparison comes to mind, “because these people have deceived black Americans and enslaved them to programs.”

“They’ve also made them dependent on false leaders.”

Peterson believes the situation in Baltimore is an outgrowth of the culture of grievance adopted by too many African-Americans. He even charges that African-Americans are worse off now than they were before the civil rights movement.

“Blacks are less independent. The black family unit, for the most part, has been destroyed. Blacks today are more dependent on government programs and handouts,” he said.

Peterson also believes whites are enabling black dysfunction by refusing to tell the truth about race.

“If whites are not willing to be honest about race and blacks don’t drop their anger and stop blaming whites, we will continue to be divided for another 50 years,” he said.

Lawyer, talk-radio host and author of “Dear Father, Dear Son: Two Lives … Eight Hours,” Larry Elder sees the collapse of the black family as the root cause for feelings of disenfranchisement and dissatisfaction among African-Americans.

In an interview with WND, Elder observed that in 1965, 25 percent of black children were born out of wedlock, while today the figure is more than 70 percent.

“Even Obama said a kid growing up without a father is five times more likely to be poor, nine times more likely to drop out, 20 times more likely to end up in jail,” said Elder.

Elder points to decades of failed federal policy as one cause of rise in single-parent families.

“Lyndon Baines Johnson’s ‘war on poverty’ in the mid-60s and the explosion of single-parent families corresponds with the growth of federal spending on ‘anti-poverty’ programs,” he noted. “According to the Heritage Foundation, we’ve spent over $22 trillion – and poverty has flatlined.”

More ominously, Elder warned the same problems are now taking root among white Americans.

“Whites, too, have seen an explosion in out-of-wedlock births. In 1965, 3.1 percent of whites were born to a single parent. Now the number is over 25 percent. If anything, the rate of growth of white out-of-wedlock births is far more rapid that the black rate.”

Peterson also sees the “lack of love” and the “absence of good fathers” as two of the leading problems the black family faces today. Yet as Jack Cashill notes, the lack of fathers in the African-American community isn’t just an economic or social disadvantage for blacks but a powerful contributor to a culture of grievance.

Cashill, author of “If I Had a Son: Race, Guns, and the Railroading of George Zimmerman,” told WND that Jesse Lee Peterson “has made the powerful case that the root cause is the anger generated by growing up without fathers and sometimes without mothers.”

“For a half century, black leadership has channeled that flood of anger into a hatred of the white man and ‘white’ institutions. Yes, white families are also falling apart, but the resulting anger is much more diffuse, much less focused,” he said. “So the young people in question do not instinctively hate those who would help them.”

Cashill said the collapse of the black family is the inevitable result of liberal social policy. He identifies mistaken incentives provided by the government that have the effect of directly encouraging the father to leave the home.

“At the same time these destructive policies were implemented,” Cashill said, “liberal thought leaders were working on a number of fronts to diminish the value of family.

“A charismatic black Democrat political leader could have addressed this issue on both the policy and philosophy fronts. Obama’s refusal to do so stands as the greatest failure of his administration.”

In contrast to trying to help blacks with what Elder calls the “race card,” the “sage of South Central,” as he is known, says the best thing the federal government can do is get out of the way.

When asked how to repair the black family and cities like Baltimore, Elder responded quickly: “End welfare at the federal level. Allow the needs of the needy to be handled at the state level, ideally by nonprofits and community involvement. Leaders, like Obama, should keep the race card in their pocket rather than whipping it out over every new controversy.

“In cases like the encounter between professor Henry Gates and a Cambridge cop, Trayvon Martin, Ferguson, and now Baltimore, where we still don’t know how Freddie Gray died, Obama used each as an opportunity to discuss ‘root causes,’ which is code for spend more money. Of course, Baltimore schools are some of the best funded schools in the nation, spending almost $16,000 per year, per student, yet still have a high dropout rate and most graduates unable to read, write and compute at their grade level.”

Colin Flaherty, author of “White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It,” believes the country would have been better served by listening to the findings of the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, D-N.Y., who famously warned of the collapse of the black family in his 1965 report, “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.”

Flaherty told WND: “Moynihan was a pioneer in his revolutionary observations that the black family was in shambles, getting worse, and everything the government did was probably creating and increasing the problem. Thus the ‘benign neglect’ recommendation. He was right about that.”

But Flaherty also believes the treatment of Moynihan paved the way for the national refusal to discuss race, leading to a permanent culture of grievance and conflict playing out in cities like Baltimore.

“Fifty years later, we must also acknowledge he was among the first targets of the politically correct crowd,” he said. “And everything they tried on him, they perfected over the remaining 49 years since. They would not engage him, just vilify. They did not refute, just scorn. They said he was ‘blaming the victim,’ by pointing out dangerously high levels of black pathology and black family disintegration. Any leader who could deliver us back to the days when Moynihan’s predictions were just about to hit the inflection point would be a national hero.”

Peterson agrees.

“If blacks and the country at large had listened to Moynihan, instead of attacking him as a ‘racist,’ black families would still be intact, and they would be better off across the board. The country would be united based on truth, rather than divided by lies.”

He remains pessimistic about the situation of blacks in America.

“I cannot think of any notable positive developments taking place at this time,” he said.

Regarding the disintegration of public order in Baltimore, Peterson said nothing will change unless blacks stop trying to blame everyone else for their community’s problems.

“Blacks need to get over their ‘blackness’ and become Americans rather than ‘African-Americans,’” he said. “They must overcome their false sense of victimhood and stop blaming whites. They need to stop relying on the government and leaders so they can become independent and think for themselves.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/todays-black-leaders-worse-than-kkk-skinheads-combined/#MxyO8RE6gpwBLlLu.99

 

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: