Mom of teen who shot at police SHOCKS everyone when she says who is to blame…

Leave a comment

H/T Allen B West. 

The following quote is from this article.

 Tension between the black community and police officers is at an all-time high in America.

It should say White Police Offices.

The  tension  hatred of White Police Officers are a result of Barack Hussein Obama and his Black Lives Matter Thugs Lies.

Marquell Rentas, 17, and Trenton Nace, 18,

Trenton Nace, Marquell Rentas

Tension between the black community and police officers is at an all-time high in America — a direct result of the perpetuation of a twisted narrative aimed at dividing Americans.

Unfortunately for the purveyors of this narrative, people are increasingly waking up to its negative effects.

Like this mother of a Pennsylvania teenager who has been charged with shooting at police officers.

Rather than blame those horrible, racist police officers for oppressing her children, she rightfully places the inspiration for her children’s behavior on the shoulders of the Black Lives Matter movement.

According to the Associated Press, “They are in jail for doing what Black Lives Matter wanted them to do: shoot at cops,” Luz Rentas wrote in a statement given to a number of news organizations over the weekend. “The truth is that these are two punk kids following the orders of an irresponsible organization and now they’re gonna pay for it.”

The co-organizer of a Black Lives Matter chapter in Lancaster said the group rejects using violence to solve societal problems.

Officers in the borough of Columbia were responding to a report of gunshots near a cemetery just before 3:30 a.m. Friday when their own vehicles came under fire. No officers were injured.

Marquell Rentas, 17, and Trenton Nace, 18, were arrested and remained jailed Tuesday on $2 million bail. The two, who are cousins, face charges including attempted homicide of a law enforcement officer. No attorney information was listed in online court records.

Rentas told officers during his arrest, “I was shooting at you,” and then cursed at police, authorities wrote in court documents.

The Black Lives Matter movement has been participating in acts of violence and mayhem under the guise of “fighting for equality” ever since the group launched, and clearly their influence is spreading all across the country.

If you consistently stir the pot with calls of violence coming from so-called “leaders” within an influential movement, it’s only a matter of time before folks hear the message enough and start acting on it.

That being said, the individuals in question are obviously old enough to know right and wrong and should therefore be held accountable for their actions. Hopefully the negative consequences that flow out of this situation will help correct future behavior, enabling these two to grow up, mature, and be productive citizens.


Moment of silence for fallen cops marred by jeering at DNC convention 

1 Comment

Barack Hussein Obama has the blood of these fallen officers on his hands.

His racist hate filled anti cop rhetoric has inspired the black lives matter thugs to murder police officers.

May he rot in the deepest darkest pit of Hell.

A hard-earned moment of silence Thursday night at the Democratic National Convention for fallen police officers was marred by chants from the crowd of “black lives matter!” in an ugly moment that angered law enforcement representatives and underscored the anti-cop climate that has gripped the nation.

Source: Moment of silence for fallen cops marred by jeering at DNC convention | Fox News

Obama Says “ISIL” to Insult Israel 

Leave a comment

Barack Hussein Obama like all of his Muslim brothers hates Israel and want Israel wiped off the face of the earth.

But Israel is the apple of God’s eye and will be around when Obama,The Pedophile Mohammed and the rest of the Muslims are barking in Hell.

Genesis 12:3 King James Version (KJV)

And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.


RUSH:  ISIS versus ISIL. The Levant, includes Israel, includes much of the eastern Mediterranean shoreline. By using the term “ISIL,” it is meant to delegitimize Israel. It is meant to include Israel in the Levant, which would make it Palestine. I’m telling you, there’s a reason Obama does this, and his audience is not us.

Source: Obama Says “ISIL” to Insult Israel – The Rush Limbaugh Show

BREAKING: ISIS Terrorists Used Obama’s ‘Fast and Furious’


More reasons Eric “The Lawless”Holder and Barack Hussein Obama needs to be setting in a prison cell.

But sadly because they are black they will get a pass.. 

President Obama’s gun walk away program in Phoenix, Arizona known as the “Fast & Furious” program has reportedly led to the Paris terror attacks

Source: BREAKING: ISIS Terrorists Used Obama’s ‘Fast and Furious’

Irish Pastor Prosecuted for Preaching Truth


This is from Freedom Force. 

This will be happening in America thanks to Barack Hussein Obama and Loretta Lynch.

We all knew this day would come, but we never thought it would be so soon. For Christians, there has always been places that it was unlawful to preach the truth. Hundreds of years ago the British Iles was such a place. But in recent history along with America, Britain was considered a place of free expression. Thanks to political correctness those days are coming to a close.

Christian News reports

A pastor in Northern Ireland who was prosecuted with a hate crime for denouncing the Islamic religion during a Sunday sermon last year appeared in court this week as his criminal trial moved forward.

As I previously reported, Pastor James McConnell of Whitewell Metropolitan Church in North Belfast made comments concerning Islam, which brought the ire of Ulster officials. His comments were in the context of a sermon of one true God. The government considered his comments to be hate speech. The charges against McConnell prompted his assistant pastor to resign.

Now the pastor has had his first day in court.

Christian News continues

Because McConnell refused a lesser punishment by the government following police questioning, prosecutors decided to move the matter forward in court. The hate crimes charge appears to be related to the sermon being streamed online.

On Monday, prosecutors outlined their case against McConnell, calling him “unrepentant.”

“He characterizes the followers of an entire religion in a stereotypical way. And that’s grossly offensive and that’s not protected from saying it from a pulpit,” prosecuting barrister David Russell told the court. “It has nothing to do with religion or freedom of expression of his freedom to preach.”

The idea that these charges do not infringe upon Pastor McConnell freedom of speech or his freedom of religion is ridiculous. How can a man express truth contained in his Bible if the government limits the way he conveys that truth. This would make the government the final authority on interpretation.

What would be the difference between this curtailing of truth and a physical mussel placed by the state over the mouths of the Churches ministers? There is no way that the man of God can both please the state and his Head Jesus Christ.

Christian News reports

“I was attacking the theology of Islam. I was not attacking any individual Muslim,” McConnell asserted. “I didn’t go into the church to provoke anyone. I went into church to present the truth.”

He also explained why he refused lesser punishment.

“If I took that, it would be an insult to the one that I love, for I was standing up for Him—for His gospel and for His truth,” he said. “If I took that informed warning, that would be me gagged.”

If one is not allowed to point out error in other religions, then there will be no possible way for us to point out truth. The effects of this will be one false religion and the light of the gospel will be hidden in our culture.

If these trends continue, we will see more and more the ministers of God silenced by Western governments.

Under Obama: More Mass Shootings than Under the 4 Previous Presidents Combined!


This is from Eagle Rising. 

I have asked the question, is Obama staging the mass shootings to advance his gun grabbing agenda? 

It’s amazing how much we see and how much we forget. Mass shootings and mass murders are nothing new. However, under Barack Hussein Obama, both have increased exponentially when we view the numbers in light of previous occupants of the Oval Office. In fact, when it comes to mass shootings and mass murders, more have occurred under the Marxist-in-chief than the previous four presidents combined.

While the administration and the Democrat National Committee Chair have been throwing out overblown numbers regarding mass shootings, the reality, though still disturbing, is nothing like what they have been presenting.

Using information compiled via a database with incidents, fatalities and injuries from real mass shootings in the united States, take a look at the real numbers under Hussein versus our previous four presidents, and remember, unless Congress does its duty and removes this guy from office, he still has over one year left!

  • Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) – saw 11 mass shootings with 101 fatalities
  • George H. W. Bush (1989-1993) – saw 12 mass shootings with 94 fatalities
  • Bill Clinton (1993-2001) – saw 23 mass shootings with 141 fatalities
  • George W. Bush (2001-2009) – saw 20 mass shootings with 158 fatalities
  • Barack H. Obama (2009-2015 – 7th Year) – saw 162 mass shootings with 864 fatalities

The data was compiled by via several sources. To put things in perspective, take a look at the chart below regarding the number of mass shootings under these presidents.

Mass Shootings by President

That isn’t all, TruthStreamMedia also produced the following chart that shows in the listed shootings where there were eight or more people killed.

Mass Shootings by President 2

As Aaron and Melissa Dykes point out, “Obviously this isn’t so easily simplified as more guns in the hands of more crazy people, the way the media likes to spin it. We have more gun laws now than ever before. Less types of guns are legally available to the average citizen than ever before. We also have more ‘gun-free zones,’ zones where, just by the way, most of these shootings happen (because mass shooters do not follow laws or care about zones, obviously). So that’s not it.”

While the Dykes have talked about pharmaceutical use playing a part in these shootings, and we have too, there seems to be something else going on here, especially when you consider that five out of the 12 deadliest mass shootings in American history occurred in Barack Hussein Obama’s first term! That’s almost half!

For those who understand his Saul Alinsky tactics and his Marxist thought, you can clearly see that he is one that encourages these kinds of shootings in order to advance a gun grabbing agenda in violation of the Constitution and the rights of the people.

Perhaps Steven Seagal is correct about many of these mass shootings: They are simply engineered for a political agenda.

Following the controversial Sandy Hook shootings, Obama implemented 23 executive actions. He followed up just months later with two more executive actions. After every single Islamic jihad attack on US soil, he fails to identify the ideology that he loves so much as the reason behind the killings. Instead, he simply attacks gun owners and the rights of gun owners. In fact, he openly lies to the world about mass shootings, claiming that they don’t happen in other countries. He did this recently in the very city where a mass shooting by Islamic jihadists claimed the lives of nearly 130 people and injured hundreds.

With just one more year to go in his second term, Obama has said that he will give “sustained attention” to gun control. Hold onto your guns America, and keep your powder dry! This is going to be a heck of a year that we stare down tyranny and terror on our own soil!

from Freedom Outpost

Why Hillary Clinton’s gun control proposal is all wrong

Leave a comment

This is from Fox News.

Hillary would be the third term of Barack Hussein Obama.


Americans desperately want something done about mass public shootings. Hillary Clinton took a page from President Obama’s playbook Monday, vowing that as president she will bypass Congress and use executive action to change how guns can be purchased.

She is angry that Republicans “refuse to do anything” about mass shootings.

But that isn’t accurate. Clinton isn’t the only one to speak out boldly on this topic. On Saturday, Donald Trump said: “And by the way, it was a gun-free zone. … I’ll tell you, if you had a couple of the teachers or someone with guns in that room, you would have been a hell of a lot better off.” Others such as Sen. Marco Rubio have made a similar point.”

The Republican push has at least the virtue of potentially stopping these crimes. The Umpqua Community College in Oregon shooting shows yetanother case where guns were banned. With these killers explicitlypicking places where victims are defenseless, at some point it should be impossible to ignore.

Clinton’s proposals wouldn’t have stopped these attacks. The “universal” background checks on private transfers mayraise the cost of law-abiding citizens getting guns.

They wouldn’t have stopped any of the mass public shootings during Barack Obama’s presidency, including last Thursday’s in Oregon. At some point an enterprising reporter might ask Obama or Clinton to name just one of the cases they have used to push this law where the law would have stopped the attack.

Clinton is proposing three other measures:

1. Prohibiting domestic abusers and stalkers from buying and possessing guns. This sounds reasonable, but the change from existing law would allow people to have their guns taken from them without a court hearing. If people are committing crimes, they should be prosecuted for felonies or misdemeanors, but Clinton’s solution is to take away their guns even when they aren’t being prosecuted.

2. Closing the “Charleston Loophole,” where the federal background check worker didn’t contact the right law enforcement agencies. But the truth is more complicated. First, even a perfectly functioning background check system very likely wouldn’t have stopped the suspect, Dylann Roof, from getting a gun. Second, the current background check system is a much worse mess than Clinton recognizes.

Roof allegedly planned his attack for at least six months, so it’s hard to believe he couldn’t have figured out some way to obtain a gun. Indeed, he stole the gun he used in this attack.

The truth is, the databases the government uses to determine eligibility for gun purchases are rife with errors.

FBI Director James Comey’s comments in July about the FBI’s background check system focus on one type of error, where someone who should have been prohibited from getting a gun wasn’t stopped. But a much more common error involves people who should be able to buy guns but are stopped.

3. Repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which prevents the manufacturers and dealers of firearms from being held liable for crimes committed with their weapons. It might be hard to remember, but gun makers were being sued because they “specifically geared” their weapons to make them attractive to gang members. Among the offending characteristics listed are low price, easy concealability, corrosion resistance and high firepower. Suing an industry for making affordable products shows how far the liability-litigation madness has gone.

The lawsuits were simply an attempt to raise the costs of doing business and to bankrupt the companies. Hillary may claim she cares about the poor, but poor people in the highest-crime areas benefit the most from gun ownership, and they are the people who would be priced out of owning guns for protection.

Vowing to do something concrete about mass public shootings on the campaign trail may be popular. But Clinton’s proposed gun-control solutions refuse to address the obvious problem of gun-free zones and will make ultimately make Americans less safe.

Mark Levin: Obama Is ‘The Greatest Threat the Jews Face … Since the 1930s’


This is from CNSNews.

Mark’s comments will set the left to screaming at the top of their lungs that Mark is a racist.

Barack Hussein Obama is not only a threat to Isreal and the Jews that live there, but to hard working Americans and their business.

Nationally syndicated radio talk show host Mark Levin, on his radio program yesterday, called Barrack Obama “the greatest threat the Jews face, not in this country but in Israel, since the 1930s.”

“I’ve got something on the tip of my tongue that I believe to be absolutely accurate,” said Mark Levin, “and I’m really weighing whether to say it or not.”

“I’m gonna say it,” Levin said. “Barack Obama, as a result of this (Obama administration declassifying documents revealing Israel’s nuclear program), including arming up the Islamonazis in Tehran, is the greatest threat the Jews face, not in this country but in Israel, since the 1930s. Do you agree with me Mr. Producer?”

“He’s the greatest threat they face since the 1930s,” Levin continued, “and I say that because he is doing more now to degrade Israel’s military and defense posture, its intelligence information – he’s doing more now to arm Israel’s enemy – than anybody.”

“The Germans are resisting what he’s doing; the French are resisting what he’s doing; the Israelis are resisting what he’s doing; the Arab countries are resisting what he’s doing,” stated Levin.

“He is the greatest threat that that nation faces,” declared Levin. “And by the way, he’s a great threat to our nation too as far as I’m concerned, but umm, that for another day and every day.”

“Let me continue,” implored Levin. “Oh this will be the headline, what I just said. I don’t care.  I don’t say it for it to be a headline. I say it to communicate with you, my beloved audience, the truth, certainly as I see it. But I think it’s true. Because a nuked-up Iran, in my view, will attack Israel. And in fact, if they can get ‘em on their ICBM’s, they’re going to attack our West Coast. And the reason the French and the Germans are concerned – yes, because of Israel, but also for themselves – is because they happen to be a little closer to that neighborhood than we do.”

Spanish Inquisition, Hitler’s Gestapo and Obama

1 Comment

This is from Godfather Politics.

Obama’s spying on and harassing of Americans makes the Gestapo look like pikers.


On November 1, 1478, the Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition was established in Spain by Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. The king and queen were devout Catholics and had the church in Spain create the Inquisition to maintain Catholic orthodoxy, especially among converts from Judaism and Islam. In 1492 and 1501 the monarchs issued orders for Jews and Muslims to convert to Catholicism or leave Spain.

The Inquisition lasted for several centuries until it was formerly ended on July 15, 1834. During the 356 years of the Inquisition, nearly 100,000 individuals were accused of some form of heresy. They were put through trials that were anything but fair. Thousands were tortured into making false confessions just to end their suffering. While figures very from source to source; at least 1,300 people were executed and many thousands were stripped of all of their possessions and imprisoned for years by the Inquisition.

The Inquisition was also rife with corruption and thousands of Spaniards were falsely accused and condemned. Sometimes personal enemies of inquisitors were falsely accused with trumped up charges. In other instances the Inquisition was simply a means to gain coveted properties, wealth and estates.

On April 26, 1933, Germany Chancellor Adolf Hitler established the Geheime Staatspolizei, also known as the Gestapo or the Secret State (S.S.) Police. The first minister over the Gestapo was Hitler’s number two man, Hermann Göring. From its formation until the fall of Germany on May 8, 1945, the Gestapo was worse than the Spanish Inquisition in that they arrested, tortured and executed millions of German Jews and others.

Like the Inquisition, the Gestapo falsely accused German citizens of opposing Hitler or just speaking out against the Nazi empire. The pressure of the S.S. was so strong that friends betrayed friends and family betrayed family. Children were encouraged to report on anything their parents did that was contrary to Hitler and his regime. Personal feuds or disagreements were settled by reporting the other person to the Gestapo with false accusations.

Under the 12 years of Nazi rule, the Gestapo imposed a reign of terror that far exceeded the 350 years of the Inquisition. Germans were afraid to say or do anything for fear of being arrested, tortured, imprisoned and executed.

On January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama was sworn into office as America’s new leader (I still refuse to refer to him as president). He has also imposed a reign of terror, but his has been more subtle than the Inquisition or by the Gestapo. Obama has been using various government agencies to unjustly target any who openly oppose or disagree with him and his dictatorship.

He has used the Internal Revenue Service to target and harass political conservatives, Republican campaign donors, any group with ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot’ in their name, Christians and Jews.

He has used the National Security Agency (NSA) to spy on millions of Americans, especially a number of reporters that were outspoken against the Obama administration.

He has used the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to harass land owners. In some cases the EPA has prevented land owners from doing anything to improve their property. In other cases, they’ve forced honest businesses to close down for unjustifiable reasons. The EPA is being used to tyrannically control private land instead of protecting public lands as it was designed to do.

He has used the Department of Homeland Security and their immigration services to deport legal US citizens while allowing millions of illegal aliens to remain in the US. The millions of illegals are taking American jobs and depleting local and state welfare coffers.

He has used the State Department to cause friction between some our longtime allies like Israel while supporting our enemies like Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Taliban and the Palestinian Authority to name a few.

He used a Democratic controlled Congress to force the nation into a socialist healthcare program that has only left more Americans uninsured than when it was implemented.

He has set in place orders that would allow him to take total control of all forms of communication (internet, television, radio, email, etc.); the financial and banking industry and many forms of commerce and travel in the case of a declared national emergency.

He used a Democratic controlled Congress to enact the Patriot Act which gives Obama and federal authorities the right to arrest, indefinitely detain and imprison anyone in the US for any suspicion of being a threat to government. The Patriot Act basically establishes a modern US version of the Inquisition and Gestapo if Obama so orders or declares a state of emergency. Anyone who opposes him could simply and legally disappear without even having to let family know what happened or where they are.

They say history repeats itself and it is looking like that is very close to repeating itself once again in a very terrifying way.

Obama Sends Campaign Team to Israel to Defeat Netanyahu

1 Comment

This is from Truth Revolt.

Obama is a very vindictive Son Of A Bitch.

How low can Barack Hussein Obama go?

So he DOES have more campaigns to run.

According to Haaretz, President Obama’s 2012 campaign field director has been selected to be a part of a “five-man Obama team” that will run a campaign against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

As Caroline Glick–Israeli journalist and Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center–notes, the far-left Israeli news outlet “for whatever reason… chose not to translate this article in its English edition.” Fortunately, Independent Media Review and Analysis did:

Foreign Funding Bankrolls Anti-Netanyahu Campaign – Flies in 5-Man Obama Team
Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 26 January 2015 

Haaretz reporter Roi Arad revealed in an article in the Hebrew edition today that the foreign funded organization, “One Voice”, is bankrolling the V-2015 campaign to defeat Binyamin Netanyahu’s national camp in the March 2015 Knesset Elections. 

One indication of the generous financing is that it has now flown in a team of five American campaign experts (including Jeremy Bird, the Obama campaign’s national field director) who will run the campaign out of offices taking up the ground floor of a Tel Aviv office building. 

V-2015 is careful not to support a specific party – rather “just not Bibi”. As such, the foreign funds pouring into the campaign are not subject to Israel’s campaign finance laws. 

The revelation, PJMedia observes, stands in direct contrast with President Obama’s declaration in his State of the Union that he has no more campaigns to run:

‘No more campaigns to run’ in America, at least.

Here is Glick’s post:

Caroline Glick

Author · 13,050 Likes

· January 26 at 9:01am ·Edited ·

Obama won’t meet Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו in Washington when he addresses the Joint Houses of Congress in March because of Netanyahu’s visit’s proximity to the Israeli elections. And Obama, of course believes in protocol and propriety which is why he won’t get involved.
No, he’s not getting involved at all. He’s just sending his 2012 field campaign manager to Israel to run a campaign to defeat Netanyahu. That’s all. No interference whatsoever.
By the way, the link below is to a report of the article in Haaretz that I linked to in the previous post in Hebrew. For whatever reason, Haaretz chose not to translate this article in its English edition.



Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: