Advertisements
Home

Democrat tells black constituents to appreciate her getting them food stamps!

Leave a comment

This is from The Black Sphere.

The Democrats need for blacks to stay ignorant and stay on the  Democrat plantation.

Once blacks start thinking for themselves blacks then realize they are being oppressed by their Democrat overseers. 

 

Democrat Marcia Fudge, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus and race pimp doesn’t appreciate it when her constituents complain.

In a recent event, she laid it out for people who dare to ask their masters for more:

“The black caucus fights for you everyday. Even when you won’t fight for yourself. We fight for you. Whether it’s immigration or education, whether it’s food stamps or housing, we fight for you everyday. So my message to you is to contain your complaining.”

https://social.newsinc.com/media/json/69017/28575948/singleVideoOG.html?videoId=28575948&type=VideoPlayer/16×9&widgetId=2&trackingGroup=69017

Exactly how Fudge fights for IMMIGRATION for black citizens is a mystery to this black man, so I will have to get back to you on that.

And if Fudge is fighting for education of blacks, then she fights like a SISSY! Blacks are the least educated group in AMERICA!

But Fudge does fight for FOOD STAMPS and HOUSING, things that other ethnic groups seem to do well getting THEMSELVES!

“Contain your complaining!” So what the CBC has been worse for black Liberals than the Klan ever conceived it could be, Fudge wants black people to TAKE WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN!

Viva la Mexico!
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2015/02/democrat-tells-blacks-appreciate-food-stamps/

Advertisements

Dem Rep: If Blacks Don’t Vote, Kids Will Go Hungry

Leave a comment

This is from The Daily Surge.

More race baiting and fear mongering from the Congressional Black Caucus.

Blacks voting DemocRat is a ticket to stay on the DemocRat Plantation.  

 

It was all fear-mongering today at an event in celebration of the Congressional Black Caucus’ 44th Annual Legislative Conference.

If you didn’t know, we are currently in the middle of Congressional Black Caucus week. To be clear, CBC week is seven days of black politicians race-baiting, blaming white conservatives for all of America’s problems, and preaching the message of bigger government as the solution to all things.

Speaking at a CBC week event, President Obama urged the importance of voter outreach in “our schools, our offices, our churches, our beauty shops, and our barber shops.” He said black people need to “know how to register, and they need to know how and when to vote.”

“It will not relieve me of my gray hair,” Obama joked, “but it will help me pass some bills.”

But perhaps the most bizarre thing said so far during CBC week came from Rep. Marcia Fudge (Oh-D). Speaking at a CBC week forum, Fudge said if blacks don’t vote, Republicans are “going to file articles of impeachment against” Obama. “If we don’t vote” she continued, “the street in front of your house is not gonna get fixed. If we don’t vote, we gonna have hungry children across this country.”

So in short; if black people don’t vote for democrats who will then vote for more government programs, black children will starve, Obama will be impeached, and neighborhoods across the country will crack and crumble.

These black liberals and Democratic politicians assume that if black people don’t vote for and rely on government, that they will surely perish. This disgraceful and degrading assumption that blacks are inferior and incapable of survival without daddy government, is one of the most insulting and shameful opinions perpetuated by Democrats.

If you’re black, how are you not outraged by these kinds of assumptions? Is this rhetoric okay because it’s Democrats saying it?

As long as 9 out of 10 black people continue to deliver Democrats their vote, they’ll continue to be talked about and treated like children.
Read more at http://dailysurge.com/2014/09/dem-rep-fudge-blacks-dont-vote-kids-will-go-hungry/

7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”

3 Comments

This from Town Hall.

 

 

Racism used to mean hating someone because of his race.

No more.

Today, 99 times out of 100 in politics, the word “racist” is used purely for political reasons without any regard to whether something bigoted was actually said.

That doesn’t mean that racism doesn’t exist. It CERTAINLY DOES and sometimes it’s right out in the open, like the Left’s “Black Americans are way too stupid and incompetent to get voter ID like all the other races” canard. But, if we were to define “racism” as offensive statements about someone of another race that wouldn’t be automatically excused if Joe Biden, Harry Reid, or Bill Clinton said them, then there’s so little “racism” in politics that it’s barely worth mentioning.

Yet, the accusations of “racism” never seem to stop. Why? Because when liberals cry “racism,” they don’t really mean racism. They mean….

1) You disagree with me: “The Republican Party is racist.” “Sarah Palin is racist.” There’s a famous Tea Party sign that reads, “It doesn’t matter what this sign says. You’ll call it racism anyway!” Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. “Everybody” knows it. In other words, liberals believe they can’t be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be “racist” by default. It’s about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a “poopy head,” but it’s how they think.

2) I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people “racist.” Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn’t find enough things to call “racist,” they’d be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living.

3) Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election? Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can’t even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option.

4) You are disagreeing with a minority: The last thing any liberal wants is to argue an issue on its merits. Is it logical? Does it work? Is the benefit worth the cost? These things have NOTHING to do with why liberals support a position. So, one of the many ways they try to get people off track is to accuse any white person arguing with a minority of being racist. This is a neat trick, given that roughly 70% of Hispanic Americans and 90% of black Americans vote Democrat. Maybe Republicans should adopt this one and start accusing liberals who disagree with Allen West, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz of being racists.

5) Your attack is damaging us: When Republicans hit Democrats with any kind of damaging attack, it is inevitably called “racist.” For example, this is how former MSNBC host Martin Bashir could say something as crazy as,“Republicans are using [the IRS scandal] as their latest weapon in the war against the black man in the White House. ‘IRS’ is the new ‘N****r.’” It’s an attempt to shut Republicans up.

6) You won’t do what I want!: When you reward and encourage people who claim to be offended by trivia instead of laughing at them for being such pansies, it only encourages them to lash out more at people who hurt their precious feelings. Liberals who get their feelings hurt tend to respond by classifying the people who’ve egregiously offended them – by say, wearing a Redskins jersey, supporting lower taxes, or not voting for Obama — as horrible human beings. Maybe they’re part of the “patriarchy,” “sexists,” “homophobes” or “racists.” In all fairness, if Hillary Clinton were running for President, liberals would be screaming about sexism all the time. However, since Obama is ruining the country at the moment, calling someone a “racist” is their preferred way of whining that people won’t do what they want.

7) Stop trying to do outreach to black Americans: Democrats believe they own black Americans. That’s why they hate black Americans who don’t buy into that or white Republicans who want to do outreach. So, if a black Republican challenges the idea that black Americans are all helpless victims of racism who need crumbs from Democrats to survive, he’ll be racially insulted. If a white Republican like Paul Ryan starts doing some outreach that could conceivably appeal to black Americans, he will immediately be attacked as a racist. The Democrats are absolutely committed to keeping black Americans under their thumbs and anyone who challenges that will be treated as a threat.

CBC asks that Issa be stripped of gavel

Leave a comment

This is from The Hill.

The Congressional Black Caucus is playing the Race Card along with Jessie Jackson against Darrel Issa(R.Cal).

They want to be able to scream how racists the Rebuplicans are by example Darrel Issa denying Elijah Cummimngs free speech.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mR8FZN-7pHk

The chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus is calling for House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) to be stripped of his gavel for his behavior at a contentious IRS hearing on Wednesday.

Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) told Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday that Issa’s conduct in the hearing — which included cutting off the microphone of Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the ranking Democrat — amounted to “an affront to the expectations of the American people.” Fudge also said Issa should apologize on the House floor.

“The American people have the right to expect that their elected leaders be held to the highest possible standards of conduct. Congressional committee leaders are held to an even higher standard due to their unique positions,” Fudge wrote in a letter to Boehner.

“Congressman Darrell Issa of California abused his authority and therefore must be reprimanded to ensure the dignity of the House of Representatives is preserved.”

Fudge’s letter comes in the wake of a memorable House Oversight hearing with Lois Lerner, the former IRS official at the center of the agency’s targeting controversy. While the Oversight Committee is no stranger to conflict, the hearing turned rowdy even by the committee’s usual standards.

Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment rights before the panel, as she had at a May 2013 hearing.

After Issa had adjourned the hearing, Cummings tried to make a statement, at which point Issa cut off his microphone. Democrats yelled “Shame!”

Cummings loudly criticized Issa’s handling of the IRS investigation without the microphone, calling it one-sided and “un-American.”

“I am a member of the United States Congress of America! I am tired of this!” he yelled.

Boehner stood by Issa on Thursday, saying he was “within his rights to adjourn the hearing.”

The Speaker faced repeated questions from reporters about Issa’s behavior at his weekly Capitol press conference, and offered the oversight chairman a clear if unenthusiastic endorsement when asked if he would bow to Democratic demands to replace him.

“Darrell Issa is the chairman. He’s done an effective job as chairman. I support him,” Boehner said.

The White House on Thursday said administration officials found Issa’s actions during the contentious hearing “inappropriate.”

“We think its inappropriate not to allow the ranking member of a committee to speak,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said.

But the White House spokesman stopped short of endorsing the CBC’s call to strip Issa of his chairmanship.

“Congressional procedure actions like that are up to the houses of Congress,” Carney said.

Democrats are using the hearing to push the message that Republicans are running the House in a heavy-handed manner.

Dozens of Democrats appeared on the House floor Thursday to demand that the House condemn Issa, a call that Fudge put forward separately in a privileged resolution.

“Chairman Issa’s abusive behavior on March 5 is part of a continuing pattern in which he has routinely excluded members of the Committee from investigative meetings, and has routinely provided information to the press before sharing it with Committee members,” the resolution reads.

The resolution charges that Issa violated House rules, which say members must “behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House.”

Issa has suggested that Cummings, the Oversight panel’s top Democrat and a CBC member, is the one who should be apologizing.

The Oversight chairman told reporters that he had already told Cummings that there wouldn’t be opening statements, because Wednesday’s hearing was technically a continuation of Lerner’s earlier appearance.

Issa also said that Cummings has gone to great lengths to impede the committee’s oversight efforts.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/domestic-taxes/200098-cbc-chair-seeks-to-strip-issas-gavel#ixzz2vJbcTvuo
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Would They Be Proud?

Leave a comment

This is by Walter E. Williams in Town Hall.

There is no doubt in my mind Dr.King and other civil right leader’s

would be disappointed in today’s blacks.

Dr.King and others fought hard for black children to get a better education.

While  many of today’s blacks want to shun a good education.

They are contented to speak the gutter ghetto language of ebonics.

Then they call blacks that get an education Uncle Tom,Oreo and 

Whitey’s Hose Ni@@er.

Today’s blacks are content living on the DemocRat Plantation.

 

One can’t imagine the fear in the hearts of the parents of those nine black students who walked past shouting placard-carrying mobs as they entered Little Rock Central High School in 1957. Each day, they were greeted with angry shouts of “Two, four, six, eight, we don’t want to integrate.” In some rural and urban areas, during the school desegregation era, parents escorted their 5 and 6-year-old children past crowds shouting threats and screaming racial epithets. Often there were Ku Klux Klan marches and cross burnings. Much of this protest was in the South, but Northern cities were by no means exempt from the turmoil and violence of school desegregation.

Most of the parents and civil rights leaders whose sacrifices and courage made today’s educational opportunities possible are no longer with us. My question is: If they could know what many of today’s black youngsters have done with the fruits of their sacrifice, would they be proud? Most schools identified as “persistently dangerous” are predominantly black schools. To have a modicum of safety, many schools are equipped with walk-through metal detectors, security cameras and conveyor belt X-ray machines that scan book bags and purses. Nationally, the black four-year high-school graduation rate is 52 percent. In some cities, such as Detroit and Philadelphia, it’s considerably lower — 20 percent and 24 percent, respectively. In Rochester, N.Y., it’s 9 percent.

What black politicians, parents, teachers and students have created is nothing less than a gross betrayal and squandering of the struggle paid in blood, sweat and tears by previous generations to make possible the educational opportunities that were denied to blacks for so long.

Born in 1936, I’ve lived during some of our racially discriminatory history. I recall being chased out of Fishtown and Grays Ferry, two predominantly Irish Philadelphia neighborhoods, with my cousin in the 1940s and not stopping until we reached a predominantly black North Philly or South Philly neighborhood. Today that might be different. A black person seeking safety might run from a black neighborhood to a white neighborhood.

On top of that, today whites are likely to be victims of blacks. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ 2008 National Crime Victimization Survey, in instances of interracial crimes of violence, 83 percent of the time, a black person was the perpetrator and a white person was the victim. Most interracial assaults are committed by blacks. What’s worse is there are blacks still alive — such as older members of the Congressional Black Caucus, NAACP and National Urban League — who lived through the times of lynching, Jim Crow and open racism and who remain silent in the face of the current situation.

After the George Zimmerman trial, in cities such as Baltimore, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Chicago and New York, there have been a number of brutal revenge attacks on whites in the name of “justice for Trayvon.” Over the past few years, there have been many episodes of unprovoked attacks by black gangs against white people at beaches, in shopping malls, on public conveyances and in other public places in cities such as Denver, Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, Washington and Los Angeles. There’s no widespread condemnation, plus most of the time, the race of the attackers was not reported, even though media leftists and their allies are experts in reporting racial differences in everything else.

Would those black Americans who fought tooth and nail against Jim Crow, segregation, lynching and racism be proud of the findings of a recent Rasmussen poll in which 31 percent of blacks think that most blacks are racists and 24 percent of blacks think that most whites are racists? Among whites, in the same Rasmussen poll, 38 percent consider most blacks racist, and 10 percent consider most whites racist.

Black people don’t need to have a conversation with white people on matters of race. One first step would be to develop a zero tolerance for criminal and disruptive school behavior, as well as a zero tolerance for criminal behavior in neighborhoods. If city authorities cannot or will not provide protection, then law-abiding black people should find a way to provide that protection themselves

 

CBC recommends Sheila Jackson Lee for Homeland Security post

Leave a comment

This is from The Washington Times.

This is from the “you can not make this sh@@ up.

This moron while visiting Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California to watch the Mars Rover asked

“Will the rover go to where the astronauts planted the American Flag”?

She was too stupid to know it was Mars and not the moon.

Now as Rush calls them the Congressional Black Caucasians wants

Shelia “The Moron” Jackson Lee to head Homeland Security.

Just two weeks after Janet Napolitano announced her resignation as Secretary of Homeland Security, the Congressional Black Caucus has suggested Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Houston fill her spot.

A letter dated July 25 and signed by Rep. Marcia Fudge, Ohio Democrat and caucus chairwoman, urges President Obama to consider Miss Jackson Lee for the position, calling the Democrat a “voice of reason” that the agency could stand to gain, the Houston Chronicle reported.

Representative Jackson Lee would serve as an effective DHS Secretary because she understands the importance of increasing border security and maintaining homeland security,” the letter reads.

Mrs. Jackson Lee currently serves as a ranking member of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, a position that the caucus said she “stands as a strong and honest ‘voice of reason.’”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/29/cbc-recommends-sheila-jackson-lee-homeland-securit/#ixzz2aZCOE0CC
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

 

CHICAGO HOSTS EMERGENCY DEM GUN CONTROL SUMMIT

Leave a comment

This is from Breitbarts Big Government.

The DimmyCrap gun control conference is a joke.

They are not willing to address the real problem the gangs.

Democratic representatives who are also members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) gathered in Chicago on July 26 to discuss “urban shootings” and “bring attention to an issue they say has reached epidemic levels.”

They represented their gathering as “a new chapter in the decades-old fight to tackle inner-city violence.” It is one they hope will take up the slack they see following gun control’s April defeat in the Senate.

According to The Hill, Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL) said the gathering “will shine light on the burgeoning problem of gun violence in Chicago and across the nation.”

Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH) described the gathering:

We’re hosting this summit because now is the time to harness all the passion we have into one place, to get the CBC, the public and community leaders on one accord, and to help every individual understand their role in taking this movement for peace in a different direction.

“At least” 74 people were shot in Chicago over the July 4 weekend, 12 of whom died.This, in spite of Chicago’s strict gun control laws.

DOJ trolling for email tips in Zimmerman probe

Leave a comment

This is from Fox News Politics.

This is an outrageous abuse of power.

You can not get the verdict you want go on a fishing

expedition to railroad George Zimmerman.

I guess the F.B.I. report saying that Zimmerman was not a racists

means nothing.

 

More than a year after an FBI report indicated there was no evidence of racial bias in George Zimmerman’s history, the Justice Department is trolling for email tips on the former neighborhood watch volunteer as it weighs a possible federal civil rights case against him.

Amid pressure from the NAACP and several Democratic lawmakers to pursue Zimmerman, the department has set up a public email address asking for any tips or information regarding the case. The move appears to mark an expansion of the probe, after Attorney General Eric Holder said in an address Tuesday to the NAACP that his department would “consider all available information” before deciding whether to move forward.

The department also held a conference call with civil rights leaders on Monday.

The conference call included DOJ officials, along with representatives from the FBI and federal prosecutors. They spoke to civil rights leaders from Sanford, Fla., as well as others from around the country.

The call was convened by Tom Perez, assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division.

A Justice official told Fox News that both the conference call and the email address asking for tips and information are fairly standard procedure when dealing with a high-profile investigation such as this one. The department has used such tip lines in the past, including in a probe last year of the Albuquerque, N.M., police department.

Some attorneys and analysts have cautioned that Holder would have a difficult time bringing a civil rights case against Zimmerman, particularly since the investigation so far is thought to have turned up no evidence or claims that Zimmerman exhibited racial bias. Martin was black.

But other lawmakers appear to have already made up their mind.

“We do know that Mr. Martin’s civil rights have been violated,” Rep. Corrine Brown, D-Fla., said, as other members of the Congressional Black Caucus voiced similar views.

Holder has meanwhile gone beyond pursuing the investigation in the wake of the acquittal. On Tuesday, he also criticized “stand-your-ground” laws, which allow individuals to use lethal force when they believe their lives are in danger — even if they have the option of fleeing.

The NRA criticized Holder for the comments, saying self-defense is a “fundamental human right.”

Holder also, in his address to the NAACP, recounted his own past experiences with racial profiling.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/17/doj-seeking-tips-in-zimmerman-probe/#ixzz2ZLbMgVeg

 

Michelle Obama Thinks People Actually Rode The Underground Railroad

Leave a comment

This is from Freedom Outpost.

It seems Moochelle is not at smart as she wants us to believe.

Moochelle needs history lessons.

What if Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan made such a stupid remark?

It would be the lead news story for weeks and weeks on how stupid they are.

 

You know there should be some serious qualifications for being president and though most presidents have had wives and have been referred to as the “First Lady,” I’m wondering if there needs to be a qualification for that title as well. Michelle Obama not only brought up slavery and segregation as she addressed the Congressional Black Caucus on Saturday, but she apparently believes the Underground Railroad is an actual railroad.

Mrs. Obama said,

Now, back when our great-grandparents were riding that Underground Railroad, back when John Lewis was marching across that bridge in Selma, and Jim Clyburn was sitting in an Orangeburg jail, the injustices we faced were written in big, bold letters on the face of our laws. And while we may have had our differences over strategy, the battles we needed to fight were very clear.

Yes, it should have gotten several chuckles for sure. The real problem here is that she read it from a teleprompter, which means it was written beforehand and probably been fact checked by others, no doubt!

It gets worse though. Obviously playing to a large black audience, Mrs. Obama wanted to talk about slavery and segregation.

“We knew that to end slavery we needed a proclamation from our president and amendment to our Constitution,” said the first lady. “To end segregation, we needed the Supreme Court to overturn the lie of separate but equal. To reach the ballot box we needed Congress to pass the voting rights act … We moved forward and we won those battles and made progress that our parents and grandparents could never have dreamed of.”

“But today, while there are no more ‘whites only’ signs keeping us out, no one barring our children from the schoolhouse door, we know that our journey is far far from finished,” she told the audience.

Here’s an alert for Mrs. Obama. Segregation is over. Slavery is over. You didn’t experience either one. So please, stop patronizing people with dark skin.

But,of course Obama had to get her two cents worth in on nutrition. Yes, that’s right. The queen of the food Nazis put her best foot forward when it comes to foods people eat.

“What exactly do we do about children who are languishing in crumbling schools,” Obama asked. “What about kids growing up in neighborhoods where they don’t have opportunities worthy of their dreams. What about the 40% of black children who are overweight or obese, or the nearly 1 in 2 who are on track to develop diabetes in their lifetimes.

“What laws can be passed to end those wrongs,” she continued. “Make no mistake about it, change absolutely starts at home, we know that. It starts with each of us taking responsibility for ourselves and our families. Because we know that our kids won’t grow up healthy until our families start eating right and exercising. That’s on us.”

Wait, what laws? OK, I’ll bite here. She hit the nail on the head right after that. It’s called responsibility. There is no law needed. Let me ask, is Mrs. Obama suggesting that there be a law that I have to get up and run on treadmill for an hour a day? Is she implying there should be a law that I not consume adult beverages and law off of good tasting food that she deems to not be nutritional? It seems she is.

Ms. Obama also spoke about the importance of voting and holding elected officials accountable. “Who’s responsible for selecting those public servants,” she asked. “Who is ultimately responsible for decisions they make or don’t make. We are. As citizens of this great country that is our most fundamental right, our most solemn obligation, to cast a ballot and have our say in the laws that shape our lives.”

I would say our most fundamental right is freedom. Both of the Obamas think it is the ability to elect leaders that enslave us to whatever laws they want to impose. Think about that before you vote in November. Ask yourself among all the candidates out there, who is looking at answering the problems with face with more government and with more legislation and who is looking to solve problems with less government and less legislation.

%d bloggers like this: