Advertisements
Home

Indiana Billboard Results in Outrage After Insulting the Prophet Muhammad

Leave a comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

There was not any mention of Islam or The Pedophile Mohammed on the billboard.

Yet the Muslims have their panties in a wad over the billboard.

Some Muslim groups in Indianapolis are outraged over a billboard that insults the prophet Muhammad, even though he is never actually called out by name.

The largely black-and-white sign, overlooking the southbound lanes of I-465, is headlined with the words “The Perfect Man.” Underneath that headline are points describing that man, which include “married a 6-year-old,” “slave owner & dealer,” “beheaded 600 Jews in one day,” and “13 wives, 11 at one time,” and “Rapist.”

The bottom of the billboard reads, in yellow type, “Educate Truthophobes.”

Of course, Muslims are calling for those who erected the display to reveal themselves.

“It is a horrible billboard. I’m outraged by it, but saddened at the same time …  and I would like to know who is behind it,” Rima Shahid, executive director of the Muslim Alliance of Indiana, told the Indianapolis Star. Shahid added that the bill board seemed “cowardly.”

Indiana U.S. Rep. Andre Carson, a Democrat, also took issue with the sign, saying he believed it was untrue and that the billboard’s creators took matters out of context to justify their bigotry.

U.S. Sen. Todd Young, an Indiana Republican, condemned the sign.

This is beneath us — disturbing and divisive. Displays like this incite and offend rather than educate. http://www.indystar.com/story/news/2017/06/05/indianapolis-muslims-call-out-creators-local-billboard-insults-prophet-muhammad/370969001/ 

Photo published for Indy Muslims call out creators of local billboard that insults Prophet Muhammad

Indy Muslims call out creators of local billboard that insults Prophet Muhammad

An anti-Muslim billboard on I-465 has outraged and saddened local Muslim community.

indystar.com

It’s worth noting that the sign never once mentioned Muslims, Muhammad or Islam, yet Muslim groups were apparently the only ones to become offended by it. In Islamic belief, Muhammad is considered the “perfect man” as the chosen messenger for the Quran. The makers of the billboard, obviously disagree.

The Star reported that a Virginia-based outdoor advertising seller, LightPoint Impressions, was responsible for the billboard.

Advertisements

Former Dem Senator Says Ohio Cares About Jobs Not, Russia

1 Comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

It bet it is not long before Former Ohio State Senator Nina Turner gets taken to the woodshed for her honest comments.  

 

 Former Ohio state senator Nina Turner made headlines when she appeared on CNN over the weekend. Speaking bluntly on “The State of the Union,” Turner said that “no one in Ohio is asking about Russia,” The Daily Caller reported.

Turner, a Democrat, made the assertion while discussing reports alleging President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, attempted to set up a back channel with Russia.

Many on the left have attempted to tie Trump’s administration to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The mainstream media and political pundits have speculated that Trump may have shared classified information with the Kremlin, and others have suggested Putin interfered with the election which allowed Trump to win against Hillary Clinton. Nonetheless, no concrete evidence has been presented to back these claims.

When the hosts of “State of the Union” tried to turn the conversation to Russia (as usual), Turner told them that her former constituents are concerned about other issues.

“No one in Ohio is asking about Russia,” Turner stated. “I mean, we have to deal with this. It’s all on the minds of the American people. But if you want to know about people in Ohio — they want to know about jobs, they want to know about their children.”

Watch her statements below:

She continued, “I was just in California where California folks, especially the national nurses, pushing for healthy California, single payer, Medicare for all kinds of things. I talked to a Boomer, a Baby Boomer who is an African-American Baby Boomer who lives here in D.C., Russia is not in his top five. He believes that both parties are failing.”

Turner said the American people have more critical things on their mind.

“If we were to go to Flint, they want to know how they’re going to get clean water and why 8,000 people are about the to lose their homes. We are preoccupied with this. It’s not that this is not important, but everyday Americans are being left behind because it’s Russia, Russia, Russia. Do we need all 535 members of the Congress to deal with Russia? Can some deal with some domestic issues?”

Amen. Those in the mainstream media have been so hellbent on bringing down the Trump presidency, they’ve completely missed issues that actually affect everyday Americans. And they wonder why Clinton lost.

 

        

Red Alert: Shocking View on Guns from 1 Lead Comey Replacement

Leave a comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

Guns owners in America need to make our opposition to Joe Lieberman as the new Director of the FBI.

Joe Lieberman has a very anti-gun stance.

One of the top names being floated as a potential replacement for former FBI Director James Comey is that of former Democrat Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman.

While Lieberman is generally viewed as a moderate and independent-minded Democrat who gets high marks from the right for his bipartisanship and open eyes regarding the threat of radical Islamic terror, there are nevertheless a number of reasons why Lieberman should be passed over for the position, according to National Review.

Left unmentioned in the National Review article — but certainly important in the mind of gun owners — is Lieberman’s history of support for strict gun control measures, as was laid out by Gun Owners of America’s Erich Pratt in a piece published by Freedom Outpost.

Lieberman has voted against Second Amendment rights by way of supporting “gun-free zones” and so-called “assault weapons” bans, and likely wouldn’t be particularly supportive of Trump’s pro-2A agenda. He could in fact work against that agenda in a role as head of the chief federal law enforcement agency.

According to On The Issues, Lieberman has also supported universal background checks on all gun purchases, as well as mandating gun manufacturers include safety locks with all new firearms sold.

Lieberman voted against allowing Amtrak passengers to include firearms in their checked baggage and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which prohibited frivolous lawsuits against gun manufacturers for anything other than product defects.

Lieberman is also a supporter of the idea that so-called “smart” gun technology should be developed and required, technology that renders guns inoperable by anyone other than the firearm’s owner, but which is feared to be susceptible to hacking and remote disabling.

The former senator from Connecticut is certainly a nice man and a welcome respite from rabid anti-Trump leftists — one who could conceivably work with Trump in some form on certain issues — but guns and law enforcement are not those issues, meaning the FBI director position is just about the last place Lieberman should be.

Breaking: Judge Reveals Scalia Wiretap Bombshell…Media Dead Silent

1 Comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

If this is true it would make Richard Nixon look like a piker.

Bathhouse Barry was big on surveillance.

Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano is not one to make wild accusations.                

 

Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano just made a stunning claim about the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and President Barack Obama.

In a segment this week on the Fox News Business Network’s “Mornings With Maria,” Napolitano said he was told by Scalia that Scalia thought the Supreme Court was under surveillance by the administration of former President Barack Obama.

“Justice Scalia told me he often thought the court was being surveilled, and he told me that probably four or five years ago,” Napolitano said in the clip shown below.

That’s huge for a couple of reasons.

First of all, if that claim is true, it’s a gross overreach of the executive branch into the judicial branch, to say the least. But much, much more than that, think of the massive rulings that were made over the course of the Obama presidency:

Two crucial Obamacare rulings. Gay marriage legalized nationwide — one of the most controversial rulings in recent memory. And if Obama’s White House really did have the Supreme Court under surveillance, Obama could have been inappropriately informed about all of it.

And, as the judge pointed out in the segment, “the use of intelligence data for political purposes is a felony.”

Let’s not forget that President Donald Trump had also made similar accusations against the Obama administration not long ago

It’s a strange coincidence for several prominent politicians — including Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who has recently made formal requests for information on his own possible surveillance by the Obama administration — to be claiming the same injury against a man not really known for his uprightness and honesty.

Could there be some truth to this?

At the Conservative Tribune, we’ve discussed Obama’s fascination, shall we way, with surveillance before — this is just further confirmation.

But by all means, mainstream media, go nuts about whatever conversation was had between Trump and the Russians last week.

H/T The Gateway Pundit

Maxine Waters Has Her Own Russian Connections Laid Bare By Internet Sleuths

1 Comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

Well Maxine we did follow the Russian money and the trail leads right to your front door.

So now what do you have to say for yourself you hypocritical asshole?

 

Congresswoman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is one of the Democrats’ most outspoken talking heads, frequently calling for President Donald Trump’s impeachment and citing his alleged “collusion with Russia.” However, her bombastic speeches and calls to action have often been found baseless. In fact, a recently uncovered Russian connection was linked directly to Waters herself.

Got News uncovered a 2015 disclosure statement from Waters which “details her family’s investments in BlackRock’s Russia-connected Global Allocation and Balanced funds.”

This is intriguing considering that as of late, Waters has used her 15 minutes of fame to bash Trump and even went as far as to tweet “Follow the Money,” in order to further her claim of collusion with Russia and Trump campaign officials.

Well, some internet sleuths did follow the money — but it didn’t lead to Trump, it led right back to Waters.

According to RedFlag News, Waters “held $200,000 in Russia-linked retirement accounts.”

In addition to the insane amount of money that Waters had tied up in these Russian accounts, Water’s BlackRock fund revealed another surprising twist.

“A Sept. 2015 BlackRock Balanced SEC filing reveals her fund’s nearly $2.8 million in obligations to the Russian Federation,” Right Side News reported on the story.

So who is the one really tied up with Russia? Waters’ own statement shows a personal financial connection to the Kremlin to the tune of $200,000, while her fund has millions of dollars worth of obligations to the Russian Federation.

Hypocrite much?

Nancy Pelosi Melts After Being Asked 1 Simple Question

Leave a comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

Jake Lee’s question made San Fran Nan into a bigger babbling fool than normal.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has been on the front lines of the Democrat party’s war against President Donald Trump since his inauguration, except her outrageous statements have only hurt her more than the president.

During a CNN town hall on Monday night, Pelosi once again showed how completely clueless she is after she was asked by an audience member about the hypocrisy Democrats are showing over the firing of former FBI Director James Comey, The Daily Wire reported.

“Good evening, Madam Leader. Before the election on Nov. 8, your side of the aisle were asking for the former head of the FBI to resign,” said an audience member identified as small business owner Jake Lee. “Now that he has been let go, why the sudden and selective outrage from your side of the aisle?”

The question really threw Pelosi off guard. After initially denying that she ever wanted Comey fired, and stating that “Some people were asking to be let go,” (which we’re assuming was meant to state that some people wanted Comey let go) she started complaining about why Trump fired him,

“For the president of the United States to fire with his own self-admission that he didn’t like — he was tired of the Russia-Trump probe,” she said, before stumbling over her own words.

After spending a good five seconds looking around for the right word and stammering out “uh,” Pelosi finally decided upon “distressing.”

“It’s distressing. We believe in the FBI as being an independent law enforcement agency, to be respected, and not to be fired by president because he’s tired of an investigation they’re doing,” she stated.

Throughout the entire thing Pelosi was flailing her arms about, looking like some sort of bird that didn’t quite know how to fly.

Of course throughout her answer, Pelosi never actually answered the question. That’s because the Democrats have displayed their hypocrisy for the world to see, and they are counting on the liberal media to protect them from Americans demanding answers.

You can watch the moment here:

Right now, Democrats are too busy screaming about impeachment and demanding a special prosecutor to articulate why exactly they are upset about Comey being fired.

Maybe in a few weeks they will calm down and be able to form coherent sentences. I mean, as much as they were ever able to.

Report: Rice Agrees to Testify at Senate Hearing… But Her 1 Demand Speaks Volumes

Leave a comment

H/T Conservative Tribune.

Just who does Susan Rice think she is demanding where and how she will give her testimony?

Russia’s supposed interference in the 2016 election has been a hot topic for months, with Hillary Clinton even blaming her loss on vague allegations of foreign meddling.

After it was revealed that the Obama administration may have used that Russian excuse as a reason to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign, questions have swirled regarding former National Security Advisor Susan Rice’s involvement in the scandal.

Americans may not have the answers for a long time. According to the Independent Journal Review, Rice has refused to testify at an open Senate hearing regarding the allegations.

Instead, Rice has said that she would be willing to talk about the concerns with members of Congress — but only if it’s conducted in a classified, closed-door setting.

The core question is simple: Did the former national security advisor improperly “unmask” Trump campaign staff members during unrelated surveillance?

Sen. Lindsey Graham has been leading the charge to uncover the truth about Rice. “I’d like to ask questions of her,” the South Carolina Republican told CNN this week. “I have seen press reports — I don’t know how accurate they are — that she was involved in the unmasking of an American citizen who was incidentally surveilled.”

The scandal involves two overlapping themes: Alleged Russian interference during the election, and the arguably more troubling possibility that the Obama administration used that foreign factor as an excuse to spy on Americans for political gain.

“I believe Russia tried to interfere in our election,” Graham told CNN. “Did the Obama administration try to politicize intel? I don’t know. I’d like to get the answer to both.”

It is not uncommon for intelligence agencies to inadvertently record information about American citizens while conducting surveillance on international figures. Typically, those American identities are redacted from intelligence reports, because they are not the actual subjects of the surveillance and have civil liberty protections under the Constitution.

However, reports indicate that Rice requested those redacted American names to be unmasked dozens of times, most likely to use against Trump’s campaign. If true, the scandal could be one the most improper uses of government power since Watergate.

Graham wants Rice to explain exactly what happened and to set the record straight — in public. A letter from Rice’s attorney flatly declined that request.

“Ambassador Rice is prepared to assist Congressional inquiries into Russian election interference because of the important national interests at stake,” the letter stated, “provided they are conducted in a bipartisan manner, and as appropriate, in classified session.”

In other words, hidden from the American public. A standard hearing would shed light on the questions surrounding the scandal. On the other hand, a classified session would make Rice’s testimony secret — and able to be manipulated by whoever chose to leak selected segments to a media with a vested interest in making the Obama administration look good.

The chances are good that Rice fears a public, televised hearing because she knows exactly where it will find guilt: Squarely on her and other Obama administration figures.

From Benghazi to the latest Russian scandal, the modus operandi of the Obama administration has been to run shady backroom deals, and then deny and cover up the truth once the corruption is noticed.

It’s time that Rice answers not only to Congress, but also to the American people.

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: