Oregon Passes Bill that will Force Taxpayers to Fund EVERY Abortion in the State



This is a sad day for Christian taxpayers in Oregon.

The most extreme abortion funding law in the nation to force taxpayers to pay against their will for other people’s late-term and sex-selective abortions.”

— Oregon state Senate Republican Minority Leader Ted Ferrioli

So much for freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, and the right to life. Oregon already had abortion on demand, now they’ve turned a terrifying new corner and soon they’ll be the Dr. Josef Mengele of American states.

This week the Oregon legislature passed a bill, without the support of a single Republican legislator, that will FORCE every citizen of their state to play a role in the murder of thousands of children. To make matters worse, the state’s Democrats are cheering their embrace of fascism and genocide.

The Democrat bill will now require that every single health insurance plan sold in their state fully cover abortion on demand. Abortion on demand means at any point in the pregnancy, for any reason the parent chooses including sex-selective abortion, or abortion at 39 weeks. It’s a truly horrifying bill and I cannot denounce it any more strongly than the words I used above. Oregon has truly become the new home to the Nazi eugenicists utopia.

To help cover the costs the state will set aside $10 Million in taxpayer dollars to fund the abortions, and this includes a large pool of cash from which illegal immigrants can fund their abortions as well. If Oregon has $10 Million to set aside for abortions, wouldn’t that money be better spent paying for medical care for the poor? This statute is truly insane and it unmasks the hypocrisy and evil that is at the core of the Leftist eugenics fantasies. Each year, leftists waste MILLIONS (perhaps Billions) in their efforts to murder as many unplanned babies as they can, when if they would just use that money to fund low-income healthcare… we wouldn’t need socialized medicine! But who cares about logic, leftists just want the right to murder babies.

From ABC News:

In some states such as New York, abortions are cost-free if they’re deemed medically necessary. The Oregon bill is unique, however, in that patients would have access to the procedure for virtually any reason, at any time, including sex-selective and late-term abortions.

The bill would also allocate almost $500,000 over the next two years to expand cost-free reproductive health coverage, including abortions, to immigrants who are otherwise ineligible under the Oregon Health Plan — the state’s Medicaid program that currently spends nearly $2 million a year to pay for roughly 3,500 abortions statewide.

State Rep. Bill Post (R) argues that the law is unnecessary and burdensome because Oregon already pays for most abortions performed in the state. “This is already being done in Oregon…The total number of [abortion] procedures is now as of 2014 47,000…. Total cost [is] just over $22 million dollars.”

Post has been an outspoken opponent of the bill and he had hoped they would triumph, but they failed. Earlier this week he gave a tearful speech apologizing for the GOP’s failure, and begging the state’s conservatives to become more active.

Oregon Right to Life Director Gayle Atteberry was heartbroken at the legislatures decision, “This bill is wrong on so many levels. Fundamentally, HB 3391 is morally reprehensible because it will take the lives of even more innocent Oregonians.  Sadly, even the barbaric practice of late-term abortion will increase as abortion is legal in Oregon through all 9 months.  This is not to mention that many Oregonians are opposed to the use of their tax dollars to fund abortion.”

All that is left is for the state’s liberal Governor, Kate Brown (D-OR), to sign the bill into law and every Oregonian will then have their hands stained in the blood of their children.

If you’re hoping that Brown will vote against the bill, don’t hold your breath because she’s already been seen cheering it on.

Yes! Yes! Yes! “Oregon Legislature Approves Reproductive Services Bill Covering Abortions, Contraceptives” 

Photo published for Oregon Legislature Approves Reproductive Services Bill

Oregon Legislature Approves Reproductive Services Bill

Insurance companies in Oregon would be required to cover abortions and a variety of other reproductive services at no cost to the patient under a bill approved by the state Legislature.

Lila Rose, the President and Founder of Live Action Network, found the bill and Brown’s display of glee disgusting.

Guy Benson of ripped the bill, and the abortion supporters who defend, it to shreds. Benson also points out that the media has been silent as this radical bill has been pushed through the Oregon legislature, which is odd, considering how vocal the media gets when conservative bills move through their state Houses.

It’s difficult to imagine anything more extreme, aside from compulsory abortions.  It’s horrifying.  Every single Oregon Senate Democrat voted in favor of this monstrosity, with every Republican opposed.  The House vote was also almost exclusively along party lines.  Governor Brown giddily vowed to sign the legislation, calling opposition to tax-funded late-term abortion “an attack on all Oregonians.”  Orwellian.

Oregon has passed a truly radical new abortion law. It’s a monstrosity and an affront to human rights. 

Photo published for Appalling Abortion Radicalism in Oregon

Appalling Abortion Radicalism in Oregon

Crickets From the Media.

We live in troubled times, and while so much good is happening around us, Oregon exists to remind us that there is real evil in this world. Real evil that is not just “out there” with groups like ISIS, and Al Qaeda, but it’s here at home too with agencies like Planned Parenthood and the Democrat Party of Oregon.

I don’t use the word evil lightly, folks. I don’t think it should be used for political disagreements like tax increases, and healthcare bills… but when we see a group of people so hell bent on murdering innocent children, we have to call it like it is. Abortion is evil, and the legislators who voted for this abomination are evil as well.


An Inconvenient Truth about Democrats and Racial Hypocrisy

Leave a comment


The snowflakes will never accept this inconvenient truth.

Did you know that the Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, founded the KKK, and fought against every major civil rights act in U.S. history? Watch as Carol Swain, professor of political science at Vanderbilt University, shares the inconvenient history of the Democratic Party.

The brilliant Vanderbilt professor, Carol Swain,  was the most recent host for Prager University’s educational videos.

The subject she took on was the inconvenient history of the Democrat party and its uncomfortable relationship with racism and racially motivated politics.

While the Democrats like to pretend that they’ve long been the defenders of ethnic and religious minorities, this is simply a fairy tale that they’ve concocted in recent years. The truth is that the Republican Party has always been the party to put minority rights before majority interests. Always. Whether on slavery, civil rights, religious freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of association, etc. The GOP has always been the true home for defenders of minority protections.

But you don’t have to take my word for it, Dr. Swain runs through a concise and compelling history of American politics to prove that the Democrats are hypocrites and the GOP are the true defenders of minority rights.

Transcript from Prager University:

When you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party comes to mind? The Republicans? Or, the Democrats?

Most people would probably say the Democrats. But this answer is incorrect.  

Since its founding in 1829, the Democratic Party has fought against every major civil rights initiative, and has a long history of discrimination.

The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.

In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Its mission was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories with the aim of abolishing it entirely. This effort, however, was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court. In the 1857 case Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens; they’re property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery? All Democrats. The two justices who dissented? Both Republicans.

The slavery question was, of course, ultimately resolved by a bloody civil war. The commander-in-chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln – the man who freed the slaves.

Six days after the Confederate army surrendered, John Wilkes Booth, a Democrat, assassinated President Lincoln. Lincoln’s vice president, a Democrat named Andrew Johnson, assumed the presidency. But Johnson adamantly opposed Lincoln’s plan to integrate the newly freed slaves into the South’s economic and social order.

Johnson and the Democratic Party were unified in their opposition to the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery; the 14th Amendment, which gave blacks citizenship; and the 15th Amendment, which gave blacks the vote. All three passed only because of universal Republican support.

During the era of Reconstruction, federal troops stationed in the south helped secure rights for the newly freed slaves. Hundreds of black men were elected to southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the US Congress by 1900. The Democrats did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

But after Reconstruction ended, when the federal troops went home, Democrats roared back into power in the South. They quickly reestablished white supremacy across the region with measures like black codes – laws that restricted the ability of blacks to own property and run businesses. And they imposed poll taxes and literacy tests, used to subvert the black citizen’s right to vote.

And how was all of this enforced? By terror — much of it instigated by the Ku Klux Klan, founded by a Democrat, Nathan Bedford Forrest.

As historian Eric Foner – himself a Democrat – notes:

“In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.”

President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, shared many views with the Klan. He re-segregated many federal agencies, and even screened the first movie ever played at the White House – the racist film “The Birth of a Nation,” originally entitled “The Clansman.”

A few decades later, the only serious congressional opposition to the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 came from Democrats.

Eighty percent of Republicans in Congress supported the bill. Less than 70 percent of Democrats did. Democratic senators filibustered the bill for 75 days, until Republicans mustered the few extra votes needed to break the logjam.

And when all of their efforts to enslave blacks, keep them enslaved, and then keep them from voting had failed, the Democrats came up with a new strategy: If black people are going to vote, they might as well vote for Democrats. As President Lyndon Johnson was purported to have said about the Civil Rights Act, “I’ll have them n*****s voting Democrat for two hundred years.”

So now, the Democratic Party prospers on the votes of the very people it has spent much of its history oppressing.

Democrats falsely claim that the Republican Party is the villain, when in reality it’s the failed policies of the Democratic Party that have kept blacks down. Massive government welfare has decimated the black family. Opposition to school choice has kept them trapped in failing schools.  Politically correct policing has left black neighborhoods defenseless against violent crime.

So, when you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party should come to mind?

I’m Carol Swain, professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University, for Prager University.

DNC Voter Fraud Investigator Found DEAD In Florida

Leave a comment


The people connected to the DemocRat National Committee are dying at a frightening pace.

The DNC, with the help of Hillary Clinton, certainly seems to be racking up the body count in recent years, and today’s new is no different.

This week has seen the mainstream media attempt, pathetically, to shut down the Seth Rich story in which Rich, a DNC staffer, was murdered in a “botched robbery” after it was speculated that he was responsible for a massive leak of campaign emails to Wikileaks.  In the “robbery”, Seth’s phone, wallet, and watch were still on his person, giving the attack itself a personal motivation as opposed to a financial one.

Now, as the DNC faces unprecedented legal challenges after their revealed corruption during last year’s election, yet another DNC-involved truth seeker has turned up dead under peculiar circumstances.

“Hollywood police spokeswoman Miranda Grossman said Thursday that the body of 37-year-old Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. was found early Wednesday by a passerby on the city’s beach. She said detectives are trying to determine if the death was a homicide, suicide or something else.

“Whisenant worked for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami in its major crimes unit. He had joined the office in January. Court records show he had been handling several visa and passport fraud cases not too mention the DNC voter fraud case in which ‘volunteers’ were caught shredding republican absentee ballots. Coincedentaly, his body was found in Debbie Wassermann Schultz’s district.”

Voter fraud is one of the most powerful tools that the democrats have, as far as American elections go.  They fully deny its existence as well, making it doubly difficult to create a situation in which the U.S. can have a serious, adult conversation on the matter.

The imploding democratic party may somehow skate through this peculiar situation, but the rest of the political world can smell the blood in the water already, and are circling their progressive prey for the time being.

ACLU Lawyer says Trump’s Immigration Order would be Constitutional if Hillary Clinton Ordered It

1 Comment


This is pure unadulterated Liberal Lack Of Logic 101.

President Trump issues an Executive Order on immigration and it is UnConstitutional if Hillary Clinton ws president and issued the same order it would be Constitutional. 

Omar Jadwat is the ACLU lawyer who has been charged with proving that President Trump’s executive order on refugee travel (from 6 particular Muslim majority nations) is unconstitutional. On Monday, he inadvertently unmasked the truth behind the ACLU’s case and proved that almost everything that liberals do is politically motivated and has no foundation in reality.

While arguing that Trump’s travel order was unconstitutional, Jadwat admitted that had the same exact order been delivered by a hypothetical President Hillary Clinton, it would have been completely constitutional. The ACLU’s entire argument is predicated on the idea that Trump’s order is unconstitutional because it is motivated by a religious animus. Thus far, with liberal judges and courts, this argumentation has worked… which is sad, because our judges are supposed to be ruling on the constitutionality of the orders themselves… not on the motivations of the person delivering the orders.

However, it seems that the ACLU’s strategy may have finally hit a snag as a group of judges who seem more interested in the law than politics, are finally holding the ACLU accountable for their bad legal challenge.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Niemeyer expertly dissected Jadwat’s terrible argument as NTK NEWS explains:

“If a different candidate had won the election and then issued this order, I gather you wouldn’t have any problem with that?” Niemeyer asked.

Jadwat dodged on directly answering the question at first, but Niemeyer persisted, asking the question again.

Jadwat again tried to avoid the question, asking for clarification on the hypothetical, but Niemeyer once again demanded an answer.

“We have a candidate who won the presidency, some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took,” Niemeyer said. “Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”

“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional,” Jadwat admitted.

By this point in the argument, the other judges also began incredulously questioning Jadwat, seemingly in disbelief that this is what the ACLU was arguing.

Jadwat feeling the pressure must have realized that he had backed himself into a corner and switched gears, arguing that President Trump’s order was “unprecedented” in American history (it isn’t), but this just earned even more ire from the judges with one asking if Jadwat thought that every “first order on anything” was invalid? To which Jadwat answered, of course, “No, your honor.”

It should now be obvious, to anyone paying even the slightest bit of attention that the ACLU’s case is groundless and without merit.

Pennsylvania Democrat Voters say the Democrat Party is Lost and Delusional

Leave a comment


The DemocRat Party is lost and delusional and will go down hill from there.

This is the focus group that the Democrat Party and the media should be paying attention to, but is probably ignoring.

A group of Democrat voters in the Keystone state were recently interviewed by CBS’ John Dickerson for Sunday’s episode of Face the Nation and what they had to say was eye-opening. The voters explained that the Democrat Party had lost its way, that they’d stopped standing for the principles they once held, and that they were refusing to accept reality. Perhaps the most cutting attack came from one lifelong Democrat voter who argued that the Party was focused on all of the wrong things, by refusing to look seriously at what had happened in the 2016 election and instead choosing to blame their problems on the Russians and Wikileaks. “What did WikiLeaks tell us by the way? Regardless of who was behind it? They confirmed that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment are liars, and they had their thumb on the scale for Hillary Clinton. So what are they basically saying? ‘If we hadn’t been caught lying, we’d be running the country right now.’” Ouch.

VOTER 1: The Democratic Party seems to be lost. They seem to be lost because they let Republicans define who they are.

VOTER 2: They have to define who they are. They have to have a backbone about standing up for it, and not be bought out by anyone or swayed because they think they might lose their office. If you say you’re going to stand for something, you have to stand for it all the way.

VOTER 3: I’ve been a Democrat all my life. I think the Democrats — not only are they out of touch, they have no interest in correcting the situation. They’re not doing any post-mortems. They’re writing off: ‘We don’t own the White House because of Putin, or because of WikiLeaks.’ What did WikiLeaks tell us by the way? Regardless of who was behind it? They confirmed that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment are liars, and they had their thumb on the scale for Hillary Clinton.

So what are they basically saying? ‘If we hadn’t been caught lying, we’d be running the country right now.’

Chicago Gangs Assaulting Police With AR-15 Rifles Despite Gun Ban



Perhaps if Mayor Ballerina Emmanuel would explain to the gangsters that AR-15’s have been banned they would surrender them to him.

I mean after all Chicago has some of the most toughest gun laws in the nation.

Chicago has very easily become the laughing stock of the liberal anti-gun movement in recent months, but for Chicago police, it’s no laughing matter.

The city first enacted their controversial gun ban over 30 years ago, with many Americans furious over the Illinois capital’s decision to limit the Second Amendment within city limits.  The public outcry predicted a massive gun violence epidemic to come, with arguments paraphrasing the anecdote regarding “only outlaws having guns” in every possible combination of words.  The unbelievable affront against the right to bear arms even spawned mocking legislation as far away as Kennesaw, Georgia, where a law was implemented stating that every home owner must own a firearm and the ammunition to go with it.  While the southern city’s ordinance was meant as an insult to Chicago’s errant lawmakers, the measure did reduce violent crime in the city by leaps and bounds.

Now, decades later, the buzzards have come home to roost, in terms of Chicago gun violence.  The city is known as the murder capital of the United States, far surpassing any other locale, and has sadly earned the nickname “Chiraq” for the violence permeating the Windy City.

And it’s not just citizens who are falling victim to the preventable nonsense…

“Chicago Police believe members of the notorious Mexican street gang La Raza used an AR-style rifle to carry out a brazen attack on Tuesday that left two plainclothes officers wounded and touched off a citywide manhunt.

“Gunmen shot up an unmarked police van with a handgun and a .223 caliber rifle, most likely an AR-15, department sources told the Chicago Sun-Times.

“Police say both officers were shot with a “high-powered weapon” — one in the hip and arm and the other in the back. The officers were released from Stroger Hospital on Wednesday after receiving treatment for non-life threatening wounds.

“’It’s a miracle the officers are still alive,’ said police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

“The pair were investigating a prior gang-related shooting in the city’s Back of The Yards neighborhood on Tuesday night when two cars pulled up alongside the police van, according to police. Without warning, occupants of those vehicles fired ‘indiscriminately’ into the van before speeding away.”

Unfortunately, this sort of incident is becoming commonplace in Chicago, as law abiding city residents are continuing to adhere to the city’s gun ban.  This leaves only criminals patrolling the neighborhoods of what was once one of America’s most incredible cities, and, finding no resistance from an armed populace, have continued to impose their will on civilians and authorities alike.

Until Chicago fesses up to their decades-old mistake, they are unfortunately cursed to live through this nightmare of violence.


“God Bless Texas!” The Lonestar State Moves to Defund, Criminalize, and Ban Sanctuary Cities



I hope my home state of Indiana will take notice this move by Texas. 

Texas is once again leading the way in American prosperity and success.

In recent years, the largest conservative state in the nation has led the way economically, and socially… but now they’re taking steps to lead the way in law and order.

Early Thursday morning, around 3am, Texas state legislators finally voted to approve a bill that would defund sanctuary counties, cities, and localities and could lead to Texas becoming the first state to end the scourge of sanctuary cities.

The bill would allow Texas to withhold funding from county and local governments for acting as sanctuary cities – even as the Trump administration’s efforts to do so nationally have hit roadblocks. Other Republican-led states have pushed for similar policies, but Texas would be the first in which police chiefs and other officials could face criminal charges and be removed from office for not helping enforce immigration law…

The Texas House bill originally allowed local law enforcement officers to inquire about federal immigration status only if someone is arrested. A version passed in March by the state Senate went further, permitting immigration inquiries of anyone who is detained, including during traffic stops.

But a Tea Party-backed floor amendment extending the House version to apply to those detained as well as those arrested passed on an 81-64 vote, bringing the full bill closer to what the Senate approved previously…

The state Senate’s version is different enough from what the House passed that the two chambers must compromise before sending a bill to the governor. Similar efforts have collapsed in the past, though, meaning the issue isn’t yet fully settled.

Earlier this year Texas Governor Greg Abbott defunded Travis County for refusing to abide by state and federal immigration laws.

Then the Senate showed their support by passing a bill that treated Sanctuary Cities even tougher than the one the House passed early this morning.

While the media continues to highlight the opponents of these bills, please allow me to shed some light on the matter at hand. The Texas legislature is DOMINATED by Republicans who were elected to do exactly as they are now doing.

Governor Abbott is a popular Governor, both chambers of the legislature are overwhelmingly Republican, most of the state’s national politicians (like Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn) are Republican… the voters in Texas are REPUBLICAN. The media can focus on the opponents of these bills but the truth is that the vast majority of Texas’ citizens want to put an end to Sanctuary Cities. Which is why these legislators will be reelected when the time comes, because while the media may not like these bills… the people do.

Consider this, in a poll taken earlier in April (a month after he defunded Travis County) Governor Abbott was the 7th most popular Governor in America and had an approval rating of 64%! Even more telling – only 24% of Texas voters “disapproved” of the job he was doing. Abbott is leading the way in the fight against Sanctuary Cities and illegal immigration and the voters in Texas LOVE HIM for it.

Get ready folks, because as soon as the Texas state Senate and House can compromise on a deal between their two bills… the Lonestar State will be defunding, criminalizing, and banning Sanctuary Cities.

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: