Advertisements
Home

If You Don’t Know

Leave a comment

14212054_1109200119128864_1300856691087652648_n

Advertisements

BET Awards: Clinton Rally, Then a Sermon Against Abusive ‘Invention Called Whiteness’

Leave a comment

The BET Awards became a Hillary fund raiser and campaign ad.

Blacks obliviously do not care about the way Bill and Hillary actually talked about and feel about blacks.

I want to use a LBJ quote about blacks.

I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” Lyndon Baines Johnson about the Great Society plan.

The blacks continue to live on the DemocRat Plantation and voting DemocRat. 

Just as you would expect, the 2016 BET Awards were full of Black Lives Matter references and reminders to register to vote and then get out the vote for Hillary Clinton. After the opening of the award ceremony featured Beyoncé and her back-up dancers marching into the auditorium to a Martin Luther King, Jr. speech, actor and producer Terence J went on to say, “Your vote is your voice,” and reminded everyone to register and “vote smart” as he introduced the show hosts, ABC’s Blackish stars Anthony Anderson and Tracee Ellis Ross.

Source: BET Awards: Clinton Rally, Then a Sermon Against Abusive ‘Invention Called Whiteness’

SURGE: Gays, Lesbians Flock to Gun Stores 

Leave a comment

I hope the gays and lesbians catch on to the fact DemocRats do not give a damn about them.

DemocRats want them unarmed defenceless and on the plantation.

The time has come to arm yourselves and move off the DemocRat Plantation. 

Gun sales are surging in the wake of Sunday’s deadly mass shooting in Orlando, Fla. The tragedy is generating new debate over gun control reform and the right to bear arms.

Source: SURGE: Gays, Lesbians Flock to Gun Stores – Girls Just Wanna Have Guns

How Liberal Policies Destroyed Black Families

Leave a comment

This is from The Daily Signal.

The DemocRats want to keep blacks ignorant angry and permanent residents on the DemocRat Plantation.

his piece has been adapted from Crystal Wright’s new book: Con Job: How Democrats Gave Us Crime, Sanctuary Cities, Abortion Profiteering, and Racial Division.”

It’s well known how in 1965 Daniel Patrick Moynihan, assistant secretary of labor to Democrat President Johnson, warned that the black family was on the verge of a “complete breakdown” because of growing illegitimacy rates: in 1963 the out-of-wedlock birth rate for whites was 3 percent, and for blacks it was 23.6 percent.

Moynihan was part of a generation of Democrats who cared about lifting blacks up into the ranks of equal opportunity with whites, back in the days before the Democrat Party became completely morally corrupt.

In his 1965 “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action,” Moynihan observed that because more blacks were being born into unmarried homes, more blacks were becoming dependent on welfare to survive.

Then, as now, blacks represented only a small percentage of the U.S. population but a disproportionate percentage of people relying on public assistance. At the center of this “tangle of pathology,” as Moynihan called it, was “the weakness of the family structure” among blacks. “Once or twice removed, it will be found to be the principal source of most of the aberrant, inadequate, or antisocial behavior that did not establish, but now serves to perpetuate the cycle of poverty and deprivation.”

Ever since, the problem has only gotten worse.

The majority of black babies are being born to single mothers—a prescription for a life of poverty and crime. And despite the warnings that have sounded off loudly for over half a century, Democrats have done nothing to stop blacks, their most steadfast constituents, from having babies they can’t take care of. This problem has perpetuated itself for generations, producing generational poverty among blacks.

If black lives truly matter, as Democrats shout at the top of their lungs, why don’t they promulgate policies that encourage blacks to get married before they have kids?

Blacks’ voting overwhelmingly for Democrats over the past half century is the quintessential definition of political suicide.

But what’s bad for blacks translates into a high rate of return on investment for Democrats. Marketing the “no baby daddy” syndrome to blacks has translated into votes, lots of votes, approaching 100 percent from blacks over the past half century. And the black family has been dismembered in the process, like the fetuses Planned Parenthood chops up to sell for profit. Democrats don’t quit while they’re ahead. No, the donkey party doubles down on evil.

In his 1992 acceptance speech for the Democrat presidential nomination, Bill Clinton declared, “Governments don’t raise children; parents do. And you should.”

Clinton meant to say, “If you’re white, I expect you to raise your kids”—because Democrats have made it their priority for society to normalize the idea that the federal government should be responsible for parenting blacks and their children. Neither Clinton nor any Democrat president since Johnson has done anything effective to ask black Americans as a race to take responsibility for raising our kids.

No greater or more glaring example of liberals’ profiting politically off of black people’s misery can be seen than the Democrats’ refusal to address the illegitimate birthrate spiraling out of control among blacks.

More black babies are born out of wedlock today (72 percent) than into married homes. That’s dramatically worse than when Moynihan initially raised the issue (when it was 23 percent)—thanks to fifty years of encouragement by the Democrat Party.

A few years ago, my mother tutored a four-year-old black girl in pre-K at a Richmond, Va. public school. It was part of an  after-school program organized by her church’s outreach ministry. One afternoon in February, my mother was explaining to the little girl the meaning of Valentine’s Day’s. Helping the child make a card for her mother, my mother told her that she was going to give Valentine’s Day cards to special people like her husband and her children.

The little girl looked up at my mother in disbelief, asking, “You can have a husband?” Slightly shocked and a little taken aback, my mother simply responded, “Yes.”

 

It’s a sad state of affairs when the word husband is a foreign word to a little black girl.

A few weeks later, around Easter, the little girl asked my mother again, “Mrs. Wright, you have a husband?”

“Yes,” my mother responded. “Husbands, friends, they’re all the same,” replied the little girl.

No, they certainly are not all the same. But the little girl probably had gone home and asked her single mother what a husband was, and her mother had told her that. It’s difficult to have a conversation with a four-year-old about the importance of marriage.

But the problem is that this little girl will grow up with her mother’s message that husbands are just the same as boyfriends. Based on the statistics, she will likely follow her mother’s bad example and have a baby out of wedlock.

Women having babies without fathers isn’t just a sign of the moral collapse of our culture, it’s hazardous to the child. When a child is born into a single-parent home, the chances of that child’s growing up in poverty are much greater.

According to a Brookings Institution study published in 2009, if a person graduates from high school, works a fulltime job, and waits until twenty-one to get married and have children, his or her chance of succeeding in life and becoming a member of the middle class rises to 76 percent. If a person doesn’t finish high school, doesn’t marry, and has a baby before the age of twenty-one, his or her chance of becoming poor soars to 74 percent.

One of the anti-poverty solutions the Brookings study recommended was for the federal government to advocate policies that strengthen families, such as programs “to reduce unplanned pregnancies for teens and twenty-somethings.”

The Brookings researchers seem to have understood that the breakdown of the black family has been the main driver of the chronic wealth gap between whites and blacks over the past five decades. The lack of intact families among blacks leads to a lack of education and jobs, which translates into higher rates of crime and government dependency among blacks. Eureka!

You don’t have to be a neurosurgeon to see that a child born to an unmarried teenage mother isn’t going to have a rosy future in life. The conclusions of the Brookings research are obvious, but Democrats continue to ignore the plain truth. Back in 1965, Moynihan was pelted with virulent criticism for telling the truth about black America.

Things have only gotten worse since then.

Black Liberals Call Dr. Ben Carson a “Clown”

Leave a comment

This is from The Black Sphere.

Black Liberals are the clowns not Dr. Ben Carson or Justice Clarence Thomas.

Black Liberals are helping to keep blacks on the DemocRat Plantation.

Ahh, the age old question that begs an answer: how can Black Liberals be so stupid?

Meet Drew, a man and not a Black Liberal. Admittedly, he says he didn’t have the poverty experience when growing up. He still rightfully claims that he is indeed a Black man. And as such, he’s seen the bad things happening in the Black community: bad or absentee parenting, drugs, violence, disease, unwed pregnancies, and so on, objectively.

Dr. Ben Carson is from that community. He became a pediatric neurosurgeon despite being born into poverty. And as they have done with Justice Clarence Thomas, the Black and Liberal community ridicule him.

https://social.newsinc.com/media/json/69017/29735478/singleVideoOG.html?videoId=29735478&type=VideoPlayer/16×9&widgetId=2&trackingGroup=69017

Touche for Drew pointing out the obvious. Black people who will riot for Michael Brown or Freddy Gray, dare call Dr. Ben Carson a clown?!

When Did the Democratic Party Become Socialist?

Leave a comment

This is from Freedom OutPost.

The DemocRats have been successful in rewriting their racist history.

With that rewrite they are able to fool most blacks and keep them on the DemocRat Plantation with welfare payments.

What is the Democratic Party? Or should we ask what was the Democratic Party? Either way, it is not what it used to be, and many indications seem to show that this party is neither for the people nor for the United States as we know it. It all boils down to, when the Democratic Party was first formed, what it did for people and how it felt about our young nation.

“Democratic” and “Democracy” come from the Greek roots demos (the people) and kratein (to rule). But today, it means something much different.

The Democratic Party can trace it roots to Thomas Jefferson, as he founded what was originally the Republican Party; it was first known as the Democratic-Republican Party. The modern Democratic Party began during the War of 1812. The Democratic Party was anti-National Bank by the 1820’s. From mid-1830’s to the War Between the States, Democrats were America’s major party. The Democratic Party supported slavery and protested the Jim Crow laws; the Democratic Party was against any black obtaining freedom. Yes, kind of hard to believe, but totally true. The Democratic Party supported slavery and Jim Crow—make sure that sinks in.

But just when did the Democratic Party begin its slide down the road toward the Socialist/Communist ideology? It really began around 1944, when the six-time Socialist Party candidate for President stated:

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened…. I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”

It was this very idea that gave rise to the Democratic Party making a slow and purposeful move toward supporting Socialism and the ideas that go along with it. The Socialists in the United States did not achieve their full move towards making the Democratic Party more of a Socialist Party until they got a very good foothold in the 1960’s.

The 1960’s proved to be just what was ordered for the Socialists in the United States, and it was here that the New Left got its beginning. This new party idea did get as popular as they wanted until one certain radical seemed to alter their tactics so they would work well within a certain political party. This magical figure for the Socialists was Saul Alinsky, a very good friend of Presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton. Saul Alinsky stated that to change a society, one had to first infiltrate the major institutions, the school, the media, the churches, the entertainment industries, the labor unions, and the three branches of government, and then it would have the power to implement policies.

It was in the 1972 elections that the Democratic Party, through the use of the old New Left, made the final move by effectively eliminating its opposition–the centrist liberals who had viciously opposed Communist totalitarianism. Once the Centrists in the Democratic Party were eliminated, the New Left took over the Democratic Party and incorporated the “liberalism” word it had destroyed through earlier elections. It was here that Socialism began its move into the depths of the Democratic Party, with Hillary Rodham Clinton actually writing letters to Saul Alinsky telling him how great his work was and that his ideas were working well.

It was during George W. Bush’s first term that the Democrats wanted Campaign Finance Reform—but the Democrats were not really interested in true reform, only in making sure they kept their biggest donors and keeping the Republican Party from doing the same. They did this by including a small provision called the 527 Organizations, which allowed ultra-radicals like themselves to give unlimited sums of money to only the Democrats. The 527 included one George Soros, who was one of the leaders of the “Shadow Party.” But it does not stop here; one of the groups inside the Shadow Party is none other than George Soros’s own, MoveOn.org. It was after John Kerry lost the 2004 election that these groups stated;

“Now it’s our Party: we bought it, we own it.”

The Democratic Party of today is very far-left and the top parts of the Democratic party are have been infiltrated by a vast number of Socialists/Communists, which is why the DNC could not differentiate between the Democratic Party and the Socialist Party.

(Source)

Today’s ruling Democratic Party faction, whose members include the so-called “Shadow Party” and its constituent elements, call themselves “progressive Democrats.” These Democrats themselves have a leftwing faction in the House of Representatives which is formally organized into the Progressive Caucus.

The word “progressive” has been replaced with “Liberal,” and Socialist Bernie Sanders was the founder of the Progressive Caucus. This should trouble people who love their freedom and liberties because the Socialists do not like either one and will lie and steal to remove both from the United States.

Additional Democratic factions orbit specific special interest groups, such as organized labor and the Congressional Black Caucus. These auxiliaries usually work in concert with the Progressive Caucus.

On December 8, 2009, former DNC Chairman Howard Dean said that “cooperation” between European socialists and the Democratic Party had “intensified significantly” over the preceding several years and involved “regular contact” at “Congress, Senate, party and foundation levels.” He added that “efforts have been remarkable from both sides.”

Howard Dean actually said that the Socialists are making significant gains in the Democratic Party, and that was in 2009, when the extreme Socialist Barack Obama was elected to office.

In April 2010, the official website of the Social Democrats USA (SDUSA) revealed that organization’s ties to the Democratic Party. Describing itself as a “Party Within a Party,” SDUSA stated the following:

“The Social Democrats, USA kept the name Socialist Party for our political arm because we are the party of Eugene Debs, Mother Jones, Helen Keller, Carl Sandburg, Norman Thomas, A. Philip Randolph, Bayard Rustin, and thousands of people who worked to build the civil rights and trade union movements in this country. Many good folks gave their lives in these movements.

“The Socialist Party, USA, in 1956, chose to stop running candidates of its own, except on rare occasion. During the 1960’s, we began to work in the Democratic Party. This is where our allies in the civil rights and trade union movement worked and continue to work politically. We are proud of what we helped accomplish within the Democratic Party, particularly the civil rights legislation and anti-poverty programs of the 1960’s. The struggle continues….

“Our movement has been involved in the left wing of the Democratic Party since 1947. Socialist Party members helped found Americans for Democratic Action. ADA is this country’s premiere “anti-Communist, liberal” organization. We are proud of our long relationships with Eleanor Roosevelt, Hubert Humphrey, and others. We look forward to forging a good working relationship with our fellow pro-labor, anti-totalitarian, left Democrats.”

This stands out as a defining moment in the history of the United States, as can be readily seen above: the Socialists, who have been trying to take over the United States since 1956 or earlier, have finally gotten what they have wanted to obtain–one specific party to hang their sordid coats on and use to ride the United States into the depressed valley of Socialism.

Late in 2010, Communist Party USA member C.J. Atkins called for his comrades to drop their “communist” label, so that they could work more effectively inside the Democratic Party. Soon thereafter, Joe Sims, co-editor of the CPUSA publication Peoples World, acknowledged not only that collaboration with the Democrats “will be an area of engagement for those wanting to make a difference,” but also that communists might someday be able to “capture” the Democratic Party entirely. Sims warned, however, against dissolving the CPUSA entirely into the Democratic Party. Rather, he advised his organization to remain a separate entity, working both inside and outside the Democratic Party as circumstances required.

The Communist Party has taken the lead of the Socialist Party and redefined their objectives. We see here that two Anti-United States groups have now stolen the Democratic Party, and it now represents both the Socialist Party and the Communist Party.

In January 2011, Washington Examiner executive editor Mark Tapcsott enumerated the forces and special-interest groups that now dominate the Democratic Party:

“[B]ig Lawyers … and three other special interests — Big Labor union leaders, Big Green environmentalists, and Big Insiders with billions of dollars in personal wealth and foundation grants — together essentially dictate what Democrats can and cannot support on many key public policy issues…. These four groups provide most of the campaign funding and workers, political and policy expertise, legal and regulatory muscle, and strategic communications for the Democratic Party. Consequently, most Democrats are prisoners of a narrow agenda of constantly growing government budgets, regulation and taxing. have influenced the agenda of the Democratic Party and moved the party far to the left of mainstream America. These special interests have used the power of the purse to co-opt the agenda of the Democratic Party vis-a-vis campaign contributions and independent expenditures.”

Once again, other news reporters have seen this smoke screen, as illustrated above, but the Main Stream Media is aligned with both the Socialists and the Communists within the Democratic Party, and it refuses to allow this truth to be shown. The Democratic Party today is no better than the Democratic Party of the 1850’s that wished to keep slavery, and, later on, Jim Crow laws—both of which held not just blacks back, but all other poor people.

It may not surprise some to find out who organized the Shadow Party, but it will surely surprise many who think the names are wrong:

Here, the term “Shadow Party” is used specifically to refer to the network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources — money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising, and policy initiatives — to advance Democratic Party agendas, elect Democratic candidates, and guide the Democratic Party ever-further towards the left. The Shadow Party in this sense was conceived and organized principally by Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Harold Ickes. Its efforts are amplified by, and coordinated with, key government unions and the activist groups associated with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). The key organizers of these groups are veterans of the Sixties left. (For a list of some of the Shadow Party’s major players, click here.)

And here are even more surprises:

The “Shadow Party” is a term originally devised by journalists to describe “527” political committees promoting Democratic Party agendas. It is here used more specifically to refer to the network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources — money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising and policy iniatives — to elect Democratic candidates and guide the Democratic Party towards the left. The Internet fund-raising operation MoveOn.org is a key component. The Shadow Party in this sense was conceived and organized principally by Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold Ickes. Its efforts are amplified by, and coordinated with, key government unions and the activist groups associated with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). The key organizers of these groups are veterans of the Sixties left. The individuals and organizations listed on this page are some of the major players, past and present, in the Shadow Party. For a comprehensive discussion of the Shadow Party, its constituent members, and its agendas and activities, click here.

We could go on and on showing all the connections between the Socialists, Communists, and all other “Shadow Party” members, but we will just end this here and hope you pass this on and let many others know that what Hillary Rodham Clinton really wants is not what the Constitution states. Above, you see that Hillary Rodham Clinton is directly involved with the “Shadow Party” and the other Socialists/Communists wishing to destroy our Constitution and way of life. People of the United States, it is time to take our nation back from these groups and let them know we don’t want our nation changed into their way at all!
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/08/when-did-the-democratic-party-become-socialist/#bj0uu3Zd0KDXbTrA.99

A Word From Zo To CJ Pearson

Leave a comment

This is from Alfonzo Rachel.

How dare CJ Pearson think he could leave the DemocRat Plantation?

The DemocRats need to keep blacks uneducated, ignorant,

brainwashed and dependent on them so they will vote DemocRat.

CJ Pearson! How dare you escape from the liberal plantation?! They’re very Jealous people who don’t know the difference between free thinking and brainwashing.

They’re idea of free thinking is them insulting you into believing what they believe, while accusing you of being a brainwashed token tool for conservatives.

Weird, right?! But there’s another concern I have.

Hear more in this ZoNation! P
Read more at http://alfonzorachel.com/2264/a-word-from-zo-to-cj-pearson#5hQe9dG7BemLP8Dl.99

 

Obama: I’ll ‘fight any attempt’ to reverse immigration action

1 Comment

This is from The Hill.

Of course, Obama will fight to let the illegals  stay in America as Democrats need the voters and they also need new faces on the Democrat Plantation. 

 

President Obama called a looming shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security “irresponsible” and vowed to “fight any attempt to turn back” his immigration policies in an exclusive op-ed published in The Hill on Tuesday.

“It was my hope that a new, Republican-led Congress would seek to govern responsibly,” Obama wrote.

“[Instead] we’ve even heard irresponsible threats to shut down the Department of Homeland Security — the very agency tasked with securing our borders and keeping Americans safe in a time of new threats — for no reason other than partisan disagreement over my actions.”

The op-ed — also translated for Spanish-language media — comes with Republicans divided over how to roll back the president’s executive actions on immigration while funding DHS before it runs out on Saturday.

Conservative House Republicans passed a DHS funding bill that would undo programs that shield millions of illegal immigrants from deportation. But Senate Democrats blocked that measure repeatedly, insisting on a clean funding bill.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Monday moved to strip the immigration measures from the DHS funding bill, setting up separate votes, but it is unclear if House conservatives will accept that maneuver.

Obama on Tuesday showed a combative tone, saying he was certain his actions would stand and calling on Congress to take up comprehensive immigration reform.

“I am confident that all the steps I’ve taken on my own to fix our broken immigration system will eventually be implemented,” the president said. “But I also continue to believe that these steps are no substitute for congressional action.

Obama also blasted a Texas court ruling earlier this month blocking his immigration actions.

The president called U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen’s ruling “misguided.”

“Make no mistake, I disagree with this judge’s ruling,” Obama wrote in The Hill. “My administration will fight this ruling with every tool at our disposal, and I have full confidence that these actions will ultimately be upheld.”

Hanen ruled that the administration must wait to implement the controversial policies until courts rule on a legal challenge brought by 26 states.

On Monday, Obama instructed Justice Department officials to seek an emergency court order allowing him to move ahead with his orders.

“It’s time to end the era of manufactured crises, put politics aside, and focus on doing what’s best for America,” Obama wrote in The Hill op-ed.

On Wednesday, the president will take his message on the road, hosting a town hall on immigration in Miami.

Democrat tells black constituents to appreciate her getting them food stamps!

Leave a comment

This is from The Black Sphere.

The Democrats need for blacks to stay ignorant and stay on the  Democrat plantation.

Once blacks start thinking for themselves blacks then realize they are being oppressed by their Democrat overseers. 

 

Democrat Marcia Fudge, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus and race pimp doesn’t appreciate it when her constituents complain.

In a recent event, she laid it out for people who dare to ask their masters for more:

“The black caucus fights for you everyday. Even when you won’t fight for yourself. We fight for you. Whether it’s immigration or education, whether it’s food stamps or housing, we fight for you everyday. So my message to you is to contain your complaining.”

https://social.newsinc.com/media/json/69017/28575948/singleVideoOG.html?videoId=28575948&type=VideoPlayer/16×9&widgetId=2&trackingGroup=69017

Exactly how Fudge fights for IMMIGRATION for black citizens is a mystery to this black man, so I will have to get back to you on that.

And if Fudge is fighting for education of blacks, then she fights like a SISSY! Blacks are the least educated group in AMERICA!

But Fudge does fight for FOOD STAMPS and HOUSING, things that other ethnic groups seem to do well getting THEMSELVES!

“Contain your complaining!” So what the CBC has been worse for black Liberals than the Klan ever conceived it could be, Fudge wants black people to TAKE WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN!

Viva la Mexico!
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2015/02/democrat-tells-blacks-appreciate-food-stamps/

Liberals’ Use of Black People

2 Comments

This is by Walter E. Williams in Town Hall.

Liberals have blacks living on the Democrat Plantation and want them to stay there.

Liberals will do everything they can to destroy any blacks that leave the plantation..

 

Back in the day, when hunting was the major source of food, hunters often used stalking horses as a means of sneaking up on their quarry. They would walk on the opposite side of the horse until they were close enough to place a good shot on whatever they were hunting. A stalking horse not only concealed them but also, if their target was an armed man and they were discovered, would take the first shot. That’s what blacks are to liberals and progressives in their efforts to transform America — stalking horses.

Let’s look at some of the ways white liberals use black people. One of the more obvious ways is for liberals to equate any kind of injustices suffered by homosexuals and women to the black struggle for civil rights. But it is just plain nonsense to suggest any kind of equivalency between the problems of homosexuals and women and the centuries of slavery followed by Jim Crow, lynching, systematic racial discrimination and the blood, sweat and tears of the black civil rights movement.

The largest and most powerful labor union in the country is the National Education Association, with well over 3 million members. Teachers benefit enormously from their education monopoly. It yields higher pay and lower accountability. It’s a different story for a large percentage of black people who receive fraudulent education. The NEA’s white liberals — aided by black teachers, politicians and so-called black leaders — cooperate to ensure that black parents who want their children to have a better education have few viable choices.

Whenever there has been a serious push for school choice, educational vouchers, tuition tax credits or even charter schools, the NEA has fought against it. One of the more callous examples of that disregard for black education was New York Mayor Bill de Blasio’s cutback on funding for charter schools where black youngsters were succeeding in getting a better education. That was de Blasio’s way of paying back New York’s teachers union for the political support it gave him in his quest for the mayor’s office.

White liberals in the media and academia, along with many blacks, have been major supporters of the recent marches protesting police conduct. A man from Mars, knowing nothing about homicide facts, would conclude that the major problem black Americans have with murder and brutality results from the behavior of racist policemen. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, there are about 200 police arrest-related deaths of blacks each year (between 300 and 400 for whites). That number pales in comparison with the roughly 7,000 annual murders of blacks, 94 percent of which are committed by blacks. The number of blacks being murdered by other blacks is of little concern to liberals. Their agenda is to use arrest-related deaths of blacks to undermine established authority.

Liberals often have demeaning attitudes toward blacks. When Secretary of State John Kerry was a U.S. senator, in a statement about so many blacks being in prison, he said, “That’s unacceptable, but it’s not their fault.” Would Kerry also say that white prison inmates are also faultless? Johns Hopkins University sociologist Andrew Cherlin told us: “It has yet to be shown that the absence of a father was directly responsible for any of the supposed deficiencies of broken homes. … (The problem) is not the lack of male presence but the lack of male income.” The liberal vision is that fathers and husbands can be replaced by a welfare check.

Liberals desperately need blacks. If the Democratic Party lost just 30 percent of the black vote, it would mean the end of the liberal agenda. That means blacks must be kept in a perpetual state of grievance in order to keep them as a one-party people in a two-party system. When black Americans finally realize how much liberals have used them, I’m betting they will be the nation’s most conservative people. Who else has been harmed as much by liberalism’s vision and agenda?

 

https://social.newsinc.com/media/json/69017/28208102/singleVideoOG.html?videoId=28208102&type=VideoPlayer/16×9&widgetId=2&trackingGroup=69017

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: