Advertisements
Home

Eric Holder Throws a ‘B*tch Fit’: Writes Op-Ed Criticizing Comey — Hilarious Coming From His Corrupt A**

Leave a comment

H/T Girls Just Wanna Have Guns.

This is laughable coming from the second most corrupt United States Attorney General the first most corrupt is Loretta Lynch.

Eric Holder, of all people, wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post heavily criticizing Comey for reopening the Clinton investigation. This quite laughable coming from his corrupt a**. Eric Holder is responsible for ‘Fast and Furious’ and is the first Attorney General to be held in criminal and civil contempt of Congress by Democrats and Republicans. Eric’s article is nothing more than one criminal looking out for another. Check it!

By Eric Holder

I began my career in the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section 40 years ago, investigating cases of official corruption. In the years since, I have seen America’s justice system firsthand from nearly every angle — as a prosecutor, judge, attorney in private practice, and attorney general of the United States. I understand the gravity of the work our Justice Department performs every day to defend the security of our nation, protect the American people, uphold the rule of law and be fair.

That is why I am deeply concerned about FBI Director James B. Comey’s decision to write a vague letter to Congress about emails potentially connected to a matter of public, and political, interest. That decision was incorrect. It violated long-standing Justice Department policies and tradition. And it ran counter to guidance that I put in place four years ago laying out the proper way to conduct investigations during an election season. That guidance, which reinforced established policy, is still in effect and applies to the entire Justice Department — including the FBI.

The department has a practice of not commenting on ongoing investigations. Indeed, except in exceptional circumstances, the department will not even acknowledge the existence of an investigation. The department also has a policy of not taking unnecessary action close in time to Election Day that might influence an election’s outcome. These rules have been followed during Republican and Democratic administrations. They aren’t designed to help any particular individual or to serve any political interest. Instead, they are intended to ensure that every investigation proceeds fairly and judiciously; to maintain the public trust in the department’s ability to do its job free of political influence; and to prevent investigations from unfairly or unintentionally casting public suspicion on public officials who have done nothing wrong.

Director Comey broke with these fundamental principles. I fear he has unintentionally and negatively affected public trust in both the Justice Department and the FBI. And he has allowed — again without improper motive — misinformation to be spread by partisans with less pure intentions. Already, we have learned that the importance of the discovery itself may have been overblown. According to the director himself, there is no indication yet that the “newly discovered” emails bear any significance at all. And yet, because of his decision to comment on this development before sufficient facts were known, the public has faced a torrent of conspiracy theories and misrepresentations.

Advertisements

DOJ Documents Reveal Fast & Furious Weapons Linked to 69+ Killings

1 Comment

This is from AmmoLand.

Barack Obama and Eric Holder are responsible for this failed gun control attempt that lead to these 69+ deaths.

Hopefully Attorney General Trey Gowdy will indite them,try them and send them to prison where they richly deserve to be.

I will go as far to say Obama and Holder belong on death row as accessories after the fact of these murders.

From December 2012 to March 2016, 94 Fast and Furious weapons were seized; Fast and Furious weapon found in “Chapo” Guzman hideout

Fast & Furious Weapons : Guns seized in 2011 trafficked from Texas to Mexico. Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/doj-documents-reveal-fast-furious-weapons-linked-to-69-killings/#ixzz4AUzaVST4  Under Creative Commons License: Attribution  Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Fast & Furious Weapons : Guns seized in 2011 trafficked from Texas to Mexico.

Washington, DC – -(Ammoland.com)- Judicial Watch announced released Justice Department documents showing that weapons sent from the U.S. into Mexico as part of the Obama administration’s Operation Fast and Furious gunrunning program have been widely used by major Mexican drug cartels.

According to the new records, over the past three years, a total of 94 Fast and Furious firearms have been recovered in Mexico City and 12 Mexican states, with the majority being seized in Sonora, Chihuahua and Sinaloa.

Of the weapons recovered, 82 were rifles and 12 were pistols identified as having been part of the Fast and Furious program.  Reports suggest the Fast and Furious guns are tied to at least 69 killings.

Fast and Furious was a Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) “gunrunning” operation in which the Obama administration allowed guns to be sold to Mexican drug cartels in the hope the weapons would be recovered at crime scenes.  Fast and Furious weapons have been implicated in the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and hundreds of other innocents in Mexico.  Prior reports tie Fast and Furious weapons to at least 200 deaths in Mexico alone.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents last month in response to a March 17, 2016, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives seeking the following:

  • All records identifying the locations (including, but not limited to, crime scenes and the locations of seizures) at which firearms – that were identified during the course of or due to Operation Fast and Furious – have been recovered by law enforcement personnel.

The documents show 94 Fast and Furious firearms were seized, 20 were identified as being involved in “violent recoveries.”  The “violent recoveries” involved several mass killings:

  • June 30, 2014 — One 7.62mm rifle recovered in Tlatlaya, Estado de Mexico.  This is the reported date and location of a shootout in which 22 people were killed.
  • May 22, 2015 — Two 7.62mm rifles recovered from the site of a massive shootout in Rancho el Sol, Michoacán, that left one Mexican Federal Police officer and 42 suspected cartel members dead.
  • August 7, 2015 — One 7.62mm rifle was among five firearms reported as recovered from an abandoned stolen vehicle in which three dead shooting victims were found in Parral, Chihuahua.
  • January 29, 2013 — One 7.62mm rifle seized in Hostotipaquillo, Jalisco is reportedly related to the assassination of the town police chief, Luis Lucio Astorga and his bodyguard.
  • January 11, 2016 — One .50 caliber rifle seized from the Joaquin “Chapo” Guzman’s hideout in Los Mochis, Sinaloa, where he was (re)arrested.

In October 2014, Judicial Watch uncovered the fact that an AK 47 rifle used in a July 29, 2013, gang-style assault on an apartment building that left two people wounded was part of the Obama Department of Justice’s Fast and Furious gunrunning program.

“These documents show President Obama’s legacy includes one of gunrunning and violence in Fast and Furious,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “As the production of documents from the ATF continues, we expect to see even further confirmation of Obama’s disgraced former Attorney General Eric Holder’s prediction that Fast and Furious guns will be used in crimes for years to come.”

In 2014, Judicial Watch litigation forced the disclosure of Fast and Furious documents to Congress after years of delay.

Judicial Watch has a related active lawsuit seeking access to all records of communications between the Department of Justice and the House Oversight Committee relating to settlement discussions in the Committee’s 2012 contempt of Congress lawsuit against then-Attorney General Eric Holder (Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:13-cv-1344)).

The contempt citation stemmed from Holder’s refusal to provide documents to Congress related to the Fast and Furious gunrunning scandal.

About Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations, and public outreach.

For more information, visit: www.JudicialWatch.org.

Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/doj-documents-reveal-fast-furious-weapons-linked-to-69-killings/#ixzz4AV0YWo8C
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Meet The Radical Gun Control Group That Pushes The Anti-Gun Hollywood Agenda

1 Comment

This is from The Daily Caller.

Movies and TV have a propaganda message that would make Joseph Goebbels proud.

I was watching a movie where the hitman put a sound suppressor on a revolver to make the hits with.

I was screaming this is so stupid this move does not wok as depicted there was  a police officer using a 1911 that he fired about a dozen times.

This movie was set in the late 20’s or early 30’s. 

If you are a gun owner, or even somewhat knowledgeable about guns, sometimes watching television shows or movies can be frustrating.  The depiction of anything firearms-related often seems to have no basis in reality.  You’ll see someone stalking another person with a gun, then several minutes into it decide to rack the pistol and actually load a round.  What would that person have done if he encountered his adversary, politely ask him to wait while he loaded his pistol?  You’ll see people rack empty guns, then insert the magazine, then shoot the gun.  You’ll see people shoot with deadly accuracy pointing from the hip without aiming.  Just today I watched a modern British murder mystery where someone used a “silencer” to make a modern revolver whisper quiet.

Being ignorant of firearms and too lazy to actually learn anything about them for your job is one thing.  Intentionally misrepresenting the truth and slanting your tale to present your leftist agenda surreptitiously is another.

That brings me to the Entertainment Industries Council.  They are an award-winning non-profit organization founded by leaders in the entertainment industry to influence the entertainment industry.  They claim to provide information so that health and social issues are accurately depicted onscreen in feature films, TV and music videos, in music, and within the pages of comic books.

Here are just some of the suggestions they present to writers to guide their scripts so they present the proper view of guns – depicting them as evil, without utility, and unworthy of ownership.

  1. Write stories exaggerating the emotional consequences for the shooter if a gun is used
  2. Write stories showing a gun owner accidently being shot by his own gun
  3. Write stories showing a gun accidently misfiring while loading it
  4. Write stories showing a gun misfiring and shooting someone else when dropped
  5. Write stories that depict a family suing gun manufacturers
  6. Write stories showing that introducing guns makes people more prone to anger and violence
  7. Write stories showing that gun owners are ultimately too afraid to get and use their guns
  8. Write stories showing a teenage girl threatening to break up with her boyfriend if he doesn’t get rid of his gun
  9. Write stories showing parents getting prosecuted for leaving a gun out
  1. Write stories showing that women are more likely to get shot by husbands than by an intruder
  2. Write stories showing guns misfiring or jamming at critical times
  3. Write stories showing people feeling less safe when their neighbors have guns
  4. Write stories showing people getting criminally prosecuted for brandishing a firearm
  5. Write stories showing a self-defense firearm use where the person is charged with murder because it’s determined that excessive or unjustified lethal force was used
  6. Write stories showing that having a gun in the home actually increases the likelihood of a home invasion

No, I’m not kidding.  And that isn’t all.  That’s only about one-third of the anti-gun agitprop given to Hollywood writers.  You can read them for yourself here.

Even Michael Bloomberg has gotten the memo and has now launched a new campaign aimed at stigmatizing guns and gun-owning men among young women.  (See point #8 above).  His latest campaign, titled “Singled Out,” seeks to drive young women to the gun control cause by disparaging men who own firearms, and he does so using the same misrepresentations and strawman arguments the entertainment industry is seeking to do.  As the NRA said, “Few things are as painfully uncool as a 73-year-old billionaire’s desperate attempts to be relevant.”

But this is nothing new.  In 1995, future U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said that we must “brainwash” people (his word) against guns; that the media need to change the way that people think about guns.  He said that we must indoctrinate people into thinking that guns aren’t cool, that they’re not acceptable, and that we need to make guns evil in the minds of Americans like we have tobacco.  Holder asked the creative community to come up with solutions to demonize guns in the popular culture, in advertising, and the media.  He petitioned TV and radio to follow his script.  I think many have been doing a pretty good job of it.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/06/meet-the-radical-gun-control-group-that-pushes-the-anti-gun-hollywood-agenda/#ixzz43Ivb3LSr

N.C. Police Chief Retires After Calling Black Lives Matter An ‘American-Born Terrorist Group’

Leave a comment

This is from Opposing Views.

 Surf City police chief Mike Halstead did not lie about the Black Lives Matters thugs.

 

   

A North Carolina police chief retired on Tuesday after sparking controversy with a Facebook post in which he referred to the Black Lives Matter movement as a “terrorist group.”

Surf City police chief Mike Halstead retired yesterday following an emergency town meeting called by the mayor to discuss a post written by Halstead, in which he said the Black Lives Matter movement was “nothing more than an American born terrorist group,” WWAY TV 3 reports.

“The FBI and other Government Law Enforcement groups need to step up and put a stop to this,” Halstead’s Sept. 3 Facebook post read.

“The Government and blacks would not tolerate the White Supremacist group to march through the streets and call for the murders of a race of people and a group of public servants,” the post continued. “I agree there is a race problem in this country. It is not brought on by police officer doing their sworn duty, it is brought on by the government, the President and his cronies Al Sharpton, who is a criminal tax evader (but has the support of our so called President), Jessi Jackson, Eric Holder and that ignorant S.O.B. Farrakhan who should be charged with solicitation for murder, lord knows a white man would be arrested for the same actions of idiot Farakhan.”

According to Town Manager Larry Bergman, the post was written in response to a recent event.

“He felt pretty passionate about it,” Bergman told WWAY. “Someone had just been murdered in Texas and [the Facebook post] was in relation to that incident.”

Halstead’s retirement was accepted by the town council and is effective immediately. He will be paid 60 days severance. The post, according to Bergman, violated a department policy relating to how the chief presents himself publicly.

“Personal postings are not allowed,” Bergman said.

Many residents expressed concern over the post, but military police officer Andrew Vann told WWAY that he agrees with the chief’s message.

“In my personal experience, when you put on a badge or a uniform, that’s what people see,” he said.

“They don’t see your color,” he added. “They see the blue or the black, and that’s how the majority of police officers act, and he’s been in law enforcement for 35 years. He didn’t get there by riding the rails or hiding behind someone else.”

Sources: My Fox 8, WWAY

 

Sheriff Clarke furious at deputy’s murder; who really started the ‘war on police?’

Leave a comment

This is from BizPac Review.

I can answer  Sheriff  Clarke’s question the people who are responsible for the war on the police are as follows.

Barack Obama,Jessie Jackson,Al Sharpton,Eric Holder and Louis Farrakhan.

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. laid it out for Judge Jeanine Pirro in an interview Saturday, and he wasn’t holding back.

Saying he was “too pissed off to be diplomatic” about Friday’s ambush and murder of a uniformed deputy sheriff in Houston, Clarke blamed the White House for the “war on police.”

On Saturday, authorities announced the arrest of Shannon J. Miles, 30, a man with a criminal record, in the shooting death of Harris County Deputy Darren Goforth. Charged with capital murder, Miles could face the death penalty.

“I said last December that war had been declared against the American police officer, led by some high-profile people,” Clarke told Fox News host Jeanine Pirro on “Justice With Judge Jeanine” Saturday.

“One of them coming out of the White House, another one coming out of the United States Department of Justice. And it’s open season right now, there’s no doubt about it.”

Clarke referred to members of the Black Lives Matter movement who chant “No justice, no peace” as “black slime that needs to be eradicated from the American society.”

Pirro observed that “without leadership … people seem to be emboldened by this kind of thing.”

“Right,” Clarke said. “And that’s why I said the president of the United States started this war on police.”

Watch the interview, via Fox News.

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/08/30/sheriff-clarke-furious-at-deputys-murder-who-really-started-the-war-on-police-245114#ixzz3kMXP1bSE

 

embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTpLS9Us4yI[/embed]

Killer’s manifesto? TV gunman sent bizarre message to ABC after murders

Leave a comment

This is from Fox News.

Any bets on the fact he came from a home without a father.

Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louise Farrakhan, Eric Holder and Barack Obama are as responsible for these murders as if had pulled the trigger.

They have preached anti white rhetoric and the victim hood of blacks to the point we are seeing the beginnings of a race war.

The man who killed a reporter and her cameraman on live television Wednesday is believed to have sent a chilling manifesto to ABC News hours later, calling himself a “human powder keg” and detailing a long list of grievances.

Vester Lee Flanagan, who killed himself along a Virginia highway some time after allegedly faxing the 23-page manifesto to the network news office, blamed his rage on the June 17 shootings of nine black worshipers in a Charleston, S.C., church, grievances he had while working as a reporter with the two victims and discrimination he faced as a gay black man.

“Why did I do it?” read the fax purportedly from Flanagan, who reported for the WDBJ-7 under the name Bryce Williams. “I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15.”

The fax came in at 8:26 a.m., some two hours after reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward were gunned down in in Moneta, Va. In it, the writer claimed that the initials of the Charleston victims were scratched onto the bullets used Wednesday. The frightening missive also praised Virginia Tech gunman Seung Hui Cho, calling the man who killed 32 people in a 2007 rampage in Blacksburg, “my boy.”

“Yes, it will sound like I am angry … I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace….”

Shortly after ABC received the fax, a man claiming to be “Bryce” called the station and said he had shot two people. He apparently told the station that police were after him and hung up. ABC News said it contacted authorities.

Authorities are investigating the manifesto and have not confirmed its author. ABC News said Wednesday that a man claiming to be Bryce Williams called repeatedly weeks ago, saying that he wanted to pitch a story and needed fax information.

The 41-year-old gunman, who died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, was from California, studied broadcast journalism at San Francisco State and– after working in various media roles– joined WDBJ7 as a multimedia journalist in March 2012. A LinkedIn profile for Bryce Williams showed he worked for the station from March 2012 to February 2013.

WDBJ general manager Jeffrey Marks said Flanagan had a reputation as being an unhappy man who was difficult to work with. Marks says Flanagan was fired after “many incidents of anger.” He said when Flanagan was fired, the station had to call police to escort the man out of the office. A Twitter account linked to Flanagan included accusations that Parker had made racist comments in his presence and Ward had complained about him to human resources, accusations Marks said were not founded.

“We think they were fabricated,” the station manager said. Marks said Flanagan alleged that other employees made racially tinged comments to him, but that his EEOC claim was dismissed.

Dan Dennison, now a state government spokesman in Hawaii, was the WDBJ news director who hired Flanagan in 2012 and fired him in 2013.

“We did a thorough investigation and could find no evidence that anyone had racially discriminated against this man,” Dennison told the Associated Press. “You just never know when you’re going to work how a potentially unhinged or unsettled person might impact your life in such a tragic way.”

Parker and Ward were doing a local tourism story at an outdoor shopping mall. The shooting aired live, capturing Parker’s screams of “Oh my God,” as she fell. Ward fell, too, and the camera he had been holding on his shoulder captured a fleeting image of the suspect holding a handgun.

WDBJ quickly switched back to the anchor at the station, her eyes large and jaw dropping as she said, “OK, not sure what happened there.” The station later went live again, reporting on their own station and staff as the story developed.

But Flanagan himself also videotaped the shooting, holding a cellphone as he carried out the methodical murders. His video was later posted on Twitter and Facebook pages registered to “Bryce Williams,” showing the shooter walking up to the victims and standing a few feet away while holding the weapon. The three, in the midst of a live TV interview, do not seem to notice the gunman, who doesn’t start shooting until Ward points the camera at Parker and her interview subject.

Parker is then seen screaming and scrambling in vain to get away as roughly 15 shots are be heard, including several that were fired after the video goes dark.

 

Police forced to do something APPALLING after Boston terror shooting

Leave a comment

This is from Allen B. West.com.

Barack Obama, Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton and Eric Holder built this distrust and hatred of the police.

Damn them.

Whether we want to admit it or not, islamic jihadism and terrorism is here amongst us. There are no borders or boundaries to this battlefield and with the proliferation of social media, the tentacles of savage barbarism first unleashed by Mohammad have an unbelievably wide reach. How incredibly ironic that we have been debating the issue of domestic surveillance when this latest jihadist plot was uncovered.

As we reported yesterday, and Fox News now details, “The man shot and killed Tuesday by Boston police was plotting with another suspect to behead a cop, according to a law enforcement source. The dead suspect, 26-year-old Usaama Rahim, was under surveillance by the Joint Terrorism Task Force, which is comprised of state, local and federal law enforcement agents, when he was shot at about 7 a.m. near a CVS in the city’s Roslindale neighborhood, when he brandished the blade at police.”

 “Later Tuesday, authorities arrested another suspect, David Wright, in connection with the case, police said. “We believe the intent was to behead a police officer,” one official told The Boston Globe. “We knew the plot had to be stopped. They were planning to take action Tuesday.”

“Rahim, Wright and an unidentified third person met Sunday on a Rhode Island beach to discus plans, the affidavit, which was released Wednesday, said. Wright, who waived his Miranda rights, told the FBI the plans included an attack on a victim in another state, the court papers said.”

And by the way, that “victim in another state” is apparently Pamela Geller, who organized the Mohammed cartoon contest in Garland, Texas.

Hours prior to the shooting, Rahim told Wright he had changed plans and was going to “go after” the “boys in blue,” the court papers said.

This of course reminds us of the attack in New York City against two NYPD officers by an axe-wielding jihadist who was shot dead — who could forget the video images of his closing in for his strike?

However, what I saw on Wednesday gave me cause for greater concern. It appears that in America there are those who have learned in the case of a law enforcement shooting, the false narrative has to be promulgated.

In this case, there were family members of Rahim who immediately began to spread the lie that he was shot in the back three times while on a cell phone. And horribly enough, there were those in the community who immediately became skeptical. Not only have we entered into the realm of constant jihadists attacks, but we’re also now in a state of dysfunction where law enforcement is put on the defense.

It was very telling that the Boston Police Commissioner had to hold a special viewing of a video that detailed the incident surrounding the shooting of Rahim for community “leaders” such as the Urban League and Muslim clerics. Hat tip to the Boston Police Department Commissioner who clearly understands the new normal and defused a situation before Al Sharpton showed up in Boston and started ranting “Cell Phone hang up, don’t shoot.” I’m glad the Task Force personnel had the smarts to video the engagement so as to put all rumor and innuendo to bed.

All across America, we’re seeing the result of the persecution and distrust of our law enforcement officers. Violent crimes are up in just about every major urban center. Therefore, if there were a time for Islamic jihadists to strike – particularly black ones — it would be now.

Sure, I don’t agree with the massive metadata collection but what are we going to do? Somehow our law enforcement officers tracked, monitored and were able to confront and kill Rahim who had a nefarious intent. And in waiving his Miranda rights, Wright appears to have no remorse about the plot he intended to unleash.

But what if this plot was not aimed toward a law enforcement officer but rather just an innocent citizen — which as been the case in Australia. How do we protect ourselves on this modern borderless battlefield?

We are restraining ourselves through political correctness. We are restraining ourselves by allowing the enemy to hide in plain sight turning our liberties against us. We are demonizing our law enforcement — granted, there are bad apples in any bushel.

But are our domestic rules of engagement worse than those on the distant battlefields? I always hear people speak out against “profiling” — well, I prefer to term it as “trend analysis” — but for instance, Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Usaama Rahim had something in common — the same Islamic center in Boston. It’s not profiling, it is good investigative work to connect the dots. Look, I don’t want to know the exact TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) used to track down Rahim leading to the confrontation. I’m glad he wasn’t wounded but shot dead – I’m sick of these bleeding heart trials, and covers on Rolling Stone celebrating jihadists.

I think we should all consider the neutering of our law enforcement officers, especially in the heavily populated urban centers. It will be very hard for jihadists to launch an attack in “flyover country America.” But in the inner cities they’re able to blend in and execute their heinous actions. If we continue down the path of making our law enforcement tentative — just the same as in the combat zone restrictive ROE cause troops to hesitate — nothing good will result.

It was a sad day to watch the Police Commissioner of Boston, which has already suffered one horrific Islamic terrorist attack, forced to show a video to prove they acted correctly. Then again, it was President Obama who first castigated law enforcement officers in Cambridge, Massachusetts as “acting stupidly” — and thus the declining respect and regard for our police began.

Hannity interview with stubborn Ferguson protester disintegrates quickly

Leave a comment

This is from BizPac Review.

This is the mentality that elected and reelected Obama.

Castrate Ivory before he pollutes the gene pool.

 

Support for Michael Brown, the Ferguson, Mo. teen who was killed in August, remains at fever pitch. It was demonstrated on Thursday when an interview with one of Browns admirers fell completely apart.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4108510750001

 

Fox News host Sean Hannity admonished Brown supporter Ivory Ned for not deploring the shooting of two police officers in Ferguson early that morning, even though he was a witness to that shooting.

“People shouldn’t be shooting cops, I don’t hear you saying that, why not?” Hannity asked.

“You look at the facts first,” Ned said, and then proceeded to give Hannity his version of the “facts,” which bore little resemblance to the Justice Department’s report.

Both a St. Louis county grand jury decision and a Department of Justice report exonerated the police officer who shot Brown. Hannity read a portion of the DOJ report to Ned, indicating the Ferguson officer was justified in shooting the teen.

“Why don’t you believe Eric Holder’s Justice Department?” Hannity asked.

“It sounds like your head is a one-way street,” Ned answered.

“You have to listen to the facts,” he kept repeating to Hannity.

“Did Michael Brown rob a store, Sir? He did,” Hannity asserted, which is where the interview began disintegrating.

“Did he [Brown] intimidate a clerk? He did. Did he charge a police officer? He did. Did he fight a cop for his gun? He did,” Hannity said, listing the facts in the Brown case, as Ned kept shouting “How do you know? How do you know?”

He knows because that’s what the grand jury and the Department of Justice concluded. Meanwhile there are two cops who were shot and seriously wounded less than 24 hours before the interview, an incident Ned witnessed but apparently has little compassion for.

Instead he continues to show blind loyalty to Brown — despite the evidence.

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/03/13/hannity-interview-with-stubborn-ferguson-protester-disintegrates-quickly-186371#ixzz3UGpGofQa

OBAMA FORGOT THIS IN HIS SELMA LECTURE: ‘Blacks Are 8X More Likely to Commit Crime than Whites’

Leave a comment

This is from Clash Daily.

This will piss lots of people off.

 

The lies just keep on piling up.  Largely because a drugged-out, giant black thug robbed a store and tried to murder a white police officer, losing his own life in the process instead, the full force of our modern black-supremacist government has descended on an already beleaguered police department in America’s heartland.

The gestapo agents of Eric Holder and Barack Obama have formally concocted an official, bogus narrative which is obviously designed to help Black Grievance Industry attorneys win huge civil settlements on behalf of Michael Brown’s family, seeing as they completely failed to turn their shameless race-hoax into a criminal case against officer Darren Wilson.

Fresh from their federal witch-hunt in Ferguson, the anti-white shakedown scam enforcers want you to believe the predominantly white police department there is exceptionally racist and corrupt because of a few emailed jokes, and because blacks are stopped, cited, and arrested in higher numbers, slightly disproportionate to their local representation, compared to whites.

What they purposely fail to include in their dishonest report is that according to Eric Holder’s own Justice Department/FBI statistics, minimally mentioned even on CNN, blacks are actually 8 times more likely to commit crime than whites.

So the real tale of the Ferguson police department, and of law enforcement all over the country, is that blacks are, in reality, stopped, cited, and arrested nowhere near as much as they really should be!

Yet of course the official lies continue, and apparently continue to be believed by gullible dupes comprising the majority of our society.  Lies, especially from the grievance-hustler-in-chief, Obama.

Obama spoke in Selma, Alabama, at the 50th anniversary observance of the 1965 civil rights protest march there this pastSunday.  He depicted our present-day society as one where blacks are often still oppressed by whites.

What a load of garbage.  Blacks pretty much do whatever the hell they want in all aspects of our society, with nothing remotely resembling the accountability and consequences faced by whites.

Author Colin Flaherty (not to be confused with the disgraced, pathetic racial opportunist Colin Powell) has thoroughly debunked lie-bertarian GOP senator Rand Paul’s pandering nonsense, and the lies of countless others, about how blacks are supposedly unfairly treated by our criminal justice system, in a brave and explosively well-researched article here.

While we’re on the topic of racial disparities and law enforcement, let’s take a look at just one nearby jurisdiction to Ferguson, the city of Pine Lawn, Missouri.

Showing, by comparison, also that Ferguson is being singled out because it has whites in key government positions, Kevin Jackson of TheBlacksphere.net reports on data analysis taken directly from the website of the Attorney General of the State of Missouri.

The municipal government of Pine Lawn has a black city council and mayor.  Both municipalities have black-majority populations.  In Ferguson, blacks are 63% of the population, yet 86% of all police traffic stops are of black motorists. In Pine Lawn, whites are a tiny 1.42% of residents, yet are represented in 27.5% of all traffic stops by police.  That’s a “Disparity Index” of a whopping 19.32 against whites in Pine Lawn, whereas blacks in Ferguson have a mere “Disparity Index” of only 1.37.  Pine Lawn’s D.I. against whites is 14 times that of Ferguson’s against blacks.  Furthermore, Ferguson’s D.I. against blacks is below the statewide average of 1.59.

There are countless other case studies and withering aggregate analysis which rebut the crap being shoveled by the Obama/Holder propagandists, but not enough space here to belabor the point.

What’s the point?  It’s that instead of falsely depicting modern-day blacks in America as frequent victims of white racism, we desperately need leadership which instead more accurately sounds the alarm to the masses of gullible, vulnerable innocents about blacks’ more likely propensity to be violent criminal predators.  When over half the violent crime including murder in our society is done by such a terroristic (less than 3%) minority — young black males — to deliberately (for a political agenda) mislead the country about such a life-and-death matter is no less than high treason.

Finally, we need a president which, instead of telling discouraging lies about race, encourages our society to recognize and appreciate that it is mainly whites who envisioned and created an advanced society so prosperous and inclusive that non-whites eagerly clamor to reach our shores — including a Kenyan communist who arrived in Hawaii (where the skies are not cloudy all day) in 1959, thanks to the generosity of our then-white president, and whose alleged bastard spawn, the current occupier of the Oval Office, opportunistically lies about the Selma of 1965 having supposedly inspired his own birth circumstances in 1961.

Someone has to tell the truth.

Sheriff David Clarke Destroys Holder’s New Ferguson Charges

Leave a comment

This is from The Daily Surge.

Eric Holder is a racist turd that has abused the power of his office since day one.

We would never expect Holder to operate within the law.

https://social.newsinc.com/media/json/69017/28607951/singleVideoOG.html?videoId=28607951&type=VideoPlayer/16×9&widgetId=2&trackingGroup=69017

Despite his Justice Department’s declining to bring civil rights violation charges against former Ferguson, MO. police officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown last August, Eric Holder’s DoJ is set to sue the Ferguson Police Department for racial discrimination.

 That’s a move that Milwaukee County sheriff David Clarke calls an “abuse of power.”

“Eric Holder has gone 15 for 15 in terms of indicting police departments of some sort of wrongdoing,” Clarke said Friday on Fox and Friends. “There’s no objectivity in his investigations and oftentimes the conclusion is written before the investigation even starts.”

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit in late July against The Pennsylvania State Police’s requirement that all state-police applicants, male or female, pass the same exact physical fitness test to be admitted for cadet training. The Pennsylvania State Police challenged the federal lawsuit.

Sheriff Clarke is advising the Ferguson PD to follow suit and fight the feds’ phony, feel-good lawsuit. “If I were the city of Ferguson I would fight this.”

“Look, the Ferguson grand jury got it right,” Clarke contended. “Officer Darren Wilson acted reasonably in defending his life against Mike Brown. It was a tragedy, we all know that. But Eric Holder early on before that investigation had started said we’ll get this right and the fact that the grand jury ruled not the way he thought they should have, he’s still going to try to extract his pound of flesh.”

Clarke also mentioned that Holder’s new witch hunt will be “costly” to taxpayers and it “takes up time, valuable time that takes [officers] away from the street.”

Last August Clarke said Eric Holder “owes every officer in America an apology” for his “irresponsible” and “inflammatory” rhetoric.

Watch the full interview above.
Read more at http://dailysurge.com/2015/02/sheriff-david-clarke-destroys-holders-new-ferguson-charges/

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: