Advertisements
Home

Liberal Fanatic Michael Moore Proposes The 28th Amendment To Regulate Guns

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Piss on this lard assed Jabba The Hut wanna be.

Michael Moore should stick to making movies.  All the ones he has churned out are crap, so it looks like he needs more practice at that.

However, following the Las Vegas shooting, Moore took to Facebook to call for a repeal of the Second Amendment and adopt a 28th Amendment that would prohibit your right to purchase what you like as far as guns go and inserts the notion that people have a right to be free from gun violence.

However, he is seeking to implement the very thing in which major cities in America, including Chicago and New York have done and yet, they continue to see increases in violent acts that involve guns.

Moore’s call for repealing the Second Amendment comes as no surprise since his film Bowling for Columbine.

While Moore called the Second Amendment “ancient and outdated” because it was written before bullets, revolvers and modern weapons were created, he doesn’t mention anything about the First Amendment being “ancient and outdated” simply because he is profiting from things like mobile video, television and the internet to voice his anti-American ideas.

Here’s his post.

https://www.facebook.com/v2.9/plugins/post.php?app_id=1104585352887871&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2Fr%2FZ2duorNoYeF.js%3Fversion%3D42%23cb%3Df2c883a558ee3d%26domain%3Dfreedomoutpost.com%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Ffreedomoutpost.com%252Ff184e884bf00598%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=750&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fmmflint%2Fposts%2F10154778028796857&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&width=750

PROPOSED 28th AMENDMENT TO THE US CONSTITUTION
“A well regulated State National Guard, being helpful to the safety and security of a State in times of need, along with the strictly regulated right of the people to keep and bear a limited number of non-automatic Arms for sport and hunting, with respect to the primary right of all people to be free from gun violence, this shall not be infringed.”

“I, Michael Moore, along with all who support an end to this epidemic of gun violence, propose a new Amendment to our Constitution that repeals the ancient and outdated 2nd Amendment (which was written before bullets and revolvers were even invented), and replaces it with a new 28th Amendment that guarantees States can have State militias (a.k.a. State National Guards which are made up of citizen-soldiers who are called upon in times of natural disasters or other State emergencies), allows individuals to use guns for sport and gathering food, and guarantees everyone the right to be free of, and protected from, gun violence (i.e., the public’s safety comes ahead of an individual’s right to own and fire a gun),” Moore wrote.

According to Moore, ”

This amendment would allow states and the federal government to pass laws that would regulate gun ownership in the following manner:”

• As over 90% of gun violence is committed by men, in order for a man to purchase a gun, he must first get a waiver from his current wife, plus his most recent ex-wife, or any woman with whom he is currently in a relationship (if he’s gay, he must get the waiver from his male spouse/partner). This law has greatly reduced most spousal/domestic gun murders in Canada.

• All automatic and semi-automatic guns are banned.

• No gun or clip can hold more than 6 bullets.

• To activate a gun for it to be used, the trigger must recognize the fingerprint of its registered owner. This will eliminate most crimes committed with a gun as 80% of these crimes are done with a stolen gun.

• One’s guns must be stored at a licensed gun club or government-regulated gun storage facility. Believing that having a gun in your home provides you with protection is an American myth. People who die from a home invasion make up a sad but minuscule .04% of all gun murders in the US. And over a third of them are killed by their own gun that the criminal has either stolen or wrestled from them.

• To own and operate a gun one must obtain a license (like one does to operate a car). To get a license you have to complete a gun training and safety course and pass a thorough background check.

• As nearly half of all gun deaths are suicides, mental health care must become a top national health priority and must be properly funded. And by making it more difficult to purchase a gun – and requiring its storage outside the home – easy access during a suicidal moment is denied.

• Current restrictions placed on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), due to successful lobbying by the NRA, have prohibited them from studying the gun violence epidemic in the US. These rules need to be removed and the funding restored. Science will then be free to find out why we are ALONE among nations in killing each other at such a massive rate (hint: It’s not just the guns – it’s us as Americans).

OK, OK.  So all automatic and semi-automatic guns are banned.  You guys will just have revolvers.  Oh, and if you have it, you’ve got to have a “smart gun,” which is really a dumb gun that allegedly only you can use, but can be foiled fairly simply.

Additionally, by banning ALL of these weapons, isn’t Moore going to also be arming the State National Guard, police and military with revolvers.

“This is the sane approach that meets everyone’s needs – everyone, that is, except those of the serial killer, the mass murderer, the violent ex-husband, the disgruntled employee or the disturbed and bullied teenager,” Moore wrote. 

Sadly, this doesn’t stop those serial killers, mass murderers, violent husbands, disgruntled employee or the disturbed and bullied teenager, does it?  Nope, it does not.

“This can come to an end with the repeal of the 2nd Amendment and replacing it with the 28th Amendment,” Moore said.

Actually, it would do no such thing as criminals would continue to have the very weapons Moore wants to be outlawed.

 

 

Advertisements

Trump Condemned for Charlottesville Statements – Obama Got a Pass on #BlackLivesMatter

1 Comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

The lame stream media worshiped at the shrine of Bathhouse Barry and wanted to prop him up.

However the lame stream media is out to take down and destroy President Donald J.Trump so whatever says or does the will condemn him. 

Taking center stage this past weekend was the incident in Charlottesville, Virginia, where “white nationalist groups” and counter-protestors collided resulted in the death of a woman after James Fields Jr. hit her with his car.

One can pick up any news source and read all about it.  One can also read the response by President Trump and those who have come out condemning him for not issuing a stronger response.

According to The Washington TimesSenator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) stated on “Fox News Sunday,” “These groups seem to believe they have a friend in Donald Trump in the White House. … I would urge the president to dissuade these groups that he’s their friend.  I think the president can be very clear when he wants to be, and he needs to be clear here.”

For eight years, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah openly supported Black Lives Matter and their rhetoric, minimizing their participation in violence and rioting due to some perceived slight stemming from a justifiable police shooting of black thug Michael Brown.

Hussein Soetoro openly condemned a law enforcement agency during a memorial for five officers killed by Black Lives Matter members.

Where was Lindsay Graham in holding Obama accountable for dissuading those groups that “he was their friend?”

Nowhere.

The Washington Times continued:

Other Republican senators, including Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Ted Cruz of Texas, Marco Rubio of Florida and others condemned the deadly demonstration. But Mr. Trump’s handling of the situation fueled commentary that he is comfortable with the support of white nationalist groups, some of which praised his remarks and said they amounted to a victory because they didn’t explicitly blame anyone for the violence.

On Sunday night, Vice President Mike Pence denounced such white supremacists as “dangerous fringe groups” and said Mr. Trump shares his views.

“We have no tolerance for hate and violence from white supremacists, neo-Nazis or the KKK,” Mr. Pence said at a press conference in Cartagena, Colombia. “These dangerous fringe groups have no place in American public life and in the American debate, and we condemn them in the strongest possible terms.”

Mr. Gardner on Sunday urged the president to speak out again in more forceful terms and make clear that the Republican Party does not welcome such views. A failure to do that, the senator said, makes it fair to question if Mr. Trump wants to remain popular among white nationalists.

“Call this white supremacism, this white nationalism, evil, and let the country hear it, let the world hear it. It’s something that needs to come from the Oval Office,” Mr. Gardner said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program. “If he doesn’t do that, then we can continue to answer the question of why.”

After eight years, Republicans in Washington, DC still do not get it.  In fact, no one in Washington gets it.  Vice President Pence added to his statement to criticize accusations that President Trump was not strong or specific enough in his response.

Vice President Pence stated, “I take issue with the fact that many in the national media spent more time criticizing the president’s words than they did criticizing those that perpetrated the violence to begin with.  We should be putting the attention where it belongs, and that is on those extremist groups that need to be pushed out of the public debate entirely and discredited for the hate groups and dangerous fringe groups that they are.”

So, according to Mike Pence, dangerous fringe groups have no place in American public life and in American debate when those groups are white supremacists, neo-Nazis or the KKK.

There is no tolerance for hate and violence from these groups.

Moreover, Pence stated that extremist groups “need to be pushed out of the public debate entirely and discredited for the hate groups and dangerous fringe groups that they are.”

Yet, for eight years, citizens witnessed “tolerance” and overt support for dangerous fringe groups, such as Black Lives Matter, Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, etc. from Obama and his administration.

Is Pence saying that white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and the KKK are the only extremists groups that will receive no tolerance for hate and violence?

Is Pence saying that other “extreme fringe groups” will receive tolerance for hate and violence?

Since Pence and a few fellow Republicans are all on the band-wagon for calling out “extremist fringe groups” and going so far as to declare “these groups have no place in American public life and in the American debate,” it is only fair to include Muslim groups who support Shari’a law, killing infidels (anyone not Muslim or Muslim enough), female genital mutilation (on the rise in the US), honor killings, misogyny, and inequality under the law as also having no place in American life and in the American debate.

Why is it groups like this and others are not included?

Is it because the group who was exercising their right to peaceful assembly was white, supported nationalism, inclusion of all history, was provoked by another group, which then turned the entire assembly into a big ole hub-bub?

Why is it the other group present was not called out?

Where is the chastisement of law enforcement who did not keep the two groups separated, almost encouraging the conflict?

 Who is Mike Pence or any other individual serving in government to determine who should be excluded from American public life and American public debate?And, let’s not even get started on those in both chambers of Congress who are looking to oust/impeach/remove a duly constitutionally eligible and elected president for nothing more than not wanting the man to occupy the office.

It seems politicians have totally discounted the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America.

You know that pesky little amendment that recognizes and protects free speech, freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, freedom of religion and the right to petition government for a redress of grievances.

No one has once thought about the disenfranchisement of many American citizens during the eight years Hussein Soetoro “reign” where being white was almost condemned.

No one has thought about the support and encouragement of members of Black Lives Matter to riot, loot, commit assault and battery, engage in vandalism, and disrupt society during their “assemblies.”

And, none of these individuals have thought about the number of individuals attending Trump events during the presidential election cycle who were met with violence as police officers stood by and watched.

Make no mistake – the First Amendment does not protect violence, riots or commission of crimes.

It does protect all speech and peaceful assemblies.

That said, while some may not agree with the viewpoints of the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, BLM or the Black Panthers and may not like what they say or represent, these groups have a right to their beliefs, a right to voice those beliefs and a right to come together in peaceful assembly to petition government for a redress of grievances.

What they do not have the right to do is infringe on the rights of others or engage in criminal behavior using the protection of the First Amendment.

Whether these politicians realize it or not, members of these government dubbed “extreme fringe” groups are voters.

To make matters worse, Cokie Roberts, appearing on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday, had plenty to say in the panel discussion on Trump’s response.

Breitbart reported:

Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” network contributor Cokie Roberts declared during a panel discussion about President Donald Trump’s reaction to the violence in Charlottesville, VA that Trump had to “share responsibility.”

Roberts said, “Well, the president has to share responsibility. The fact is, is that through hat campaign, he blew all kind of whistles that those of us who grew up in the Jim Crow South, like I did, recognized immediately.”

“It was just calling out to these white supremacists who then felt empowered by it, and the president now not calling them out — you know, he should listen to Nikki Haley, his now UN ambassador,” she continued. “She’s the person who started bringing down Confederate monuments. And she did it so graciously and exactly the right tone after the killings of Mother Emmanuel Church.”

According to “Cooky” Roberts, Trump has to “share responsibility” because a “hat campaign” called out “white supremacists.”

And, that hat campaign “blew all kinds of whistles” to individuals who grew up in the Jim Crow South?  Really?

That’s a lot of assumption on a campaign slogan.

As someone who lives in the “deep south” and lived through part of the Jim Crow years, there was not one time that “whistles blew” recognizing the “calling out to white supremacists” from the Trump campaign slogan.

Actually, to me, it was a call to return to our American greatness of loyalty to the Constitution, supporting its tenets, and standing against government usurpations and any ideology anathema to it.

While that may not have been its intent, it is what I think is what makes America great.

Only someone looking to find discourse would read something sinister in the slogan.

Roberts goes on to voice support for the removal of historical monuments pertaining to the Civil War, “War of Northern Aggression,” “The War to Enslave the States,” or whatever one feels bests describes the conflict.

To support such an action, regardless of any incident, is the echo of saying Hitler’s Germany burning books and banning certain elements of history is acceptable.

If one is going to eradicate history as it pertains to Confederate monuments, then one might as well go full Monty and eradicate Union monuments, civil war battlefields, monuments to Union generals, Mount Rushmore, the Geronimo monument,  and so forth and so on – which is ridiculous.

History is history that one cannot change.

It is best to remember all elements of history in order that we may learn from it.

In looking at the atmosphere across the united States today, there are plenty of citizens who have not learned from it, if they know enough to even garner one lesson from it.

What we are seeing in all of this and the last eight years is there is no equality under the law, no Bill of Rights to protect citizens’ individual God-given rights, and whichever group(s) claims the most “offense” is the group(s) that receives special treatment.

This is the result of a government that has ignored the constitutional tenets in favor of pandering to special interest groups it deems worthy of protection – the rest of society be damned.

This is the result of a government that has engaged in usurpation, bent to the evils of corruption, supported ideologies instead of law, fueled policy through emotion stirred by special interest and an “entertainment” based news media.

Some say there are two sets of laws – one for the elite and one for the peons.  In reality, there are three sets of laws – one for the elite, one for the peons, and one for special interests favored by government.

If these charlatan Washington politicians and other charlatan elected officials would apply the laws equally, there would be no group or groups who could claim “disenfranchisement,” “discrimination,” “racism,” “bigotry,” and a whole list of other perceived slights, which would go a long way to healing a nation torn apart by a carpetbagger criminal communist socialist identity thief.

Likewise, if the lamestream enemedia would actually do their job, instead of fomenting discontent through backing a criminal enterprise, the knowledge that the Constitution is the law and its tenets apply to all might just begin to reach the many citizens who remain ignorant.

McMaster’s Work for Soros-Funded Group May Explain His Opposition to Trump

2 Comments

H/T Freedom OutPost.

I said it before and I will say it again it is time to Repeal and Replace H.R McMaster.

General H. R. McMaster has been opposed to virtually everything that President Trump wants, but why?  Many have asked this question, and now, we may finally have an answer as it has been revealed that McMaster served at a British think tank that was funded by one of George Soros’ groups.

It’s interesting to note that the group in question, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS),  was acknowledged by the Obama administration as being key to helping push the propaganda through the news media about the Iran nuclear deal.

According to the IISS website, McMaster is a “Former Consulting Senior Fellow” with expertise in Military History, Civil-Military Relations, Development and Security and Conflict and Conflict Prevention.

The site lists him as having served IISS from September 2006 to February 2017.

After taking over the National Security Council, McMaster has been involved in getting rid of those who speak out on Islamic jihad, as well as those who have spoken out on Iran and the Iran nuclear deal.

McMaster has also urged President Trump to recertify the nuclear agreement with Iran despite the fact that Iran gets everything it wants with nothing in return.

First, let’s not that McMaster was behind removing Stephen Bannon as National Security adviser.

McMaster also sent a letter to known liar Susan Rice telling her she could keep her security clearance, even though she has no business with such a clearance.

Just this past week, McMaster fired Richard T. Higgins, author of Catastrophic FailureBlindfolding America in the Face of Jihad and an outspoken critic about the faulty strategic assessment that is the basis for current U.S. security.  Higgins was reportedly a counter Islamic jihad expert.

Higgins was also a Bannon ally.

Keep in mind, McMaster is a man that engages in taqiyya on behalf of Islamic jihadis.

McMaster insists jihad terrorists were operating according to “an ideology that uses a perverted interpretation of religion to justify crimes against all humanity.”

He also told the staff of the National Security Council, in his first “all hands” staff meeting, that the label “radical Islamic terrorism” was not helpful because terrorists are “un-Islamic,” according to people who were in the meeting.

James Kouri reports on McMaster, IISS and the Ploughshares Fund:

IISS’s website contains a list of groups, corporations and government entities that provide funding to the think tank, including during the period of McMaster’s work there. Curiously missing from the page of donors is the controversial Ploughshares Fund, a grant-making group identified last year by the Obama White House as central in helping him sell the Iran nuclear deal to the news media.

“[President Barack Obama] knew full well how gullible members of the media truly are. He sold a bunch of willing reporters enough lies to spread to the American people. And McMaster added a helpful bit of credibility to the Iran pact sales pitch,” said former military intelligence operative and public safety commander Edward Mulhearn.

A previous investigation by this reporter showed Ploughshares has partnered with a who’s-who of the radical left, including Code Pink, the pro-Palestinian J Street, United for Peace & Justice, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and Demos, a progressive economic advisory group where Obama’s controversial former green jobs czar, Van Jones, has served on the board.

The group says its mission is to support the “smartest minds and most effective organizations to reduce nuclear stockpiles, prevent new nuclear states, and increase global security.” Ploughshares is in turn financed by Soros’s Open Society Institute, the Buffett Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation. Another Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, which is one of the largest contributors of the radical left. Tides is funded by Soros.

Soros has his tentacles in virtually everything anti-American going on in this country, and it seems that though many thought they got rid of Soros’ cronies from the White House, there still exists many of them, including General McMaster.

It’s time that Trump lose this guy too.

This New Piece Of Legislation Could Demolish State Gun Control Laws Across The Country

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Gun control does not work and it kills thousands of people.

Over the past century, there has been one undeniable trend working against gun rights. Put simply, as time goes on, it’s harder for a law abiding citizen to own and use a firearm, largely due to the proliferation of state and federal gun laws. A hundred years ago, one could own pretty much any firearm without restriction, and buy a firearm without even a background check (though of course, one could argue that a few of these laws are a good idea). Now it’s a heavily regulated industry.

And sure, there have been some victories for the Second Amendment. A few decades ago there were only a handful of states where it was fairly easy to attain a concealed carry permit, and even many deeply conservative states didn’t issue these permits at all. Now that situation has completely reversed and continues to improve. However, when you look at gun rights on a long enough timeline, it’s obvious that the Second Amendment has lost more than it has won, as state and federal laws have chipped away at our rights little by little.

Fortunately, there is a new piece of legislation that could significantly roll back the worst of these laws on the state level, in particular, the laws that were put in place under the Obama administration. The Second Amendment Guarantee Act, which was recently proposed by New York Congressman Chris Collins, could prove to be the most significant attack on gun control laws that we’ve seen in generations. According to a press release issued by Collins’ office:

“This legislation would protect the Second Amendment rights of New Yorkers that were unjustly taken away by Andrew Cuomo,” said Collins. “I am a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment and have fought against all efforts to condemn these rights. I stand with the law-abiding citizens of this state that have been outraged by the SAFE Act and voice my commitment to roll back these regulations.”

SAGA would provide an intimidating bulwark against gun control advocates in blue states. In a nutshell, it would prevent these states from passing restrictive laws that exceed the scope of federal gun laws.

In the Collins’ bill, States or local governments would not be able to regulate, prohibit, or require registration and licensing (that are any more restrictive under Federal law) for the sale, manufacturing, importation, transfer, possession, or marketing of a rifle or shotgun. Additionally, “rifle or shotgun” includes any part of the weapon including any detachable magazine or ammunition feeding device and any type of pistol grip or stock design.

Under this legislation, any current or future laws enacted by a state or political subdivision that exceeds federal law for rifles and shotguns would be void. Should a state violate this law, and a plaintiff goes to court, the court will award the prevailing plaintiff a reasonable attorney’s fee in addition to any other damages.

For decades, gun owners living in certain states have had their rights slowly stripped away by legislative bodies that repeatedly passed laws which are in violation of the Second Amendment, and they’ve done so almost completely unopposed. It’s the perfect example of what the Founders hoped to prevent in our society. They feared that the rights of the minority could be taken away by the majority, which is exactly what gun owners in leftists states have had to contend with.

But if SAGA passes, state governments will no longer be able to bully gun owners with their onerous and unconstitutional laws. Gun owners will finally have the same right to bear arms in every state of the union.

Maxine Waters Claims Public is “Getting Weary” Because Trump Hasn’t Been Impeached

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Maxine Waters is a certifiable nut job.

She is in a safe district in California so she knows she will have a job for life.

Rep. Maxine Waters continues to blabber about things she has no evidence in hopes the American people will hear it enough and begin to side with her.  Over the weekend she appeared on MSNBC to basically say she didn’t care whether her fellow Democrats were backing off talk of impeaching President Donald Trump or not, but then went on to claim that the American people were “getting weary” because he had not been impeached yet.

Somehow, I think she must be mixed up because plenty of Americans wanted Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah impeached for his long list of crimes.

“Congresswoman, on the subject of being more aggressive, you have openly talked about the fact that this president has put himself in a position where impeachment is on the table but your party, the Democratic party is very reluctant,” Morning Joy host Joy Reid said.  “The New York Times has an article out last week about how hesitant Democratic leadership, in particular, are to call for Donald Trump’s impeachment. In closing, why do you suppose that is?”

“I don’t know what the reticent is but I know this, that the American public is getting weary of all of these actions without enough being done by the elected officials who they elected to represent them,” Waters answered.  “I believe that this man has done enough for us to determine that we can connect the dots, that we can get the facts that will lead to impeachment.”

“I believe there was collusion,” she added, though she has absolutely no evidence of her claims.  “I think we have enough information about the meetings, the about the lying about those meetings to help us to understand that something was going on. There was an interaction there. And certainly I believe it was collusion, but if they just do their work and do their job, they will find out it was collusion.

“And I believe this president should be impeached,” she continued.  “I don’t care what others say about ‘it’s too soon, we don’t know, we think.’”

“I think that they’re letting the American public down by not delving deeper into what is going on with Jared Kushner and this back channeling, about the lies and his failure to disclose he had had these meetings, the same thing with sessions, failure to disclose about the meetings,” Waters concluded.  “What more do we need?”

Well, to be honest, failing to disclose something could be for a variety of reasons.  There could be intentional failing to disclose to hide something or there could simply be forgetfulness.  However, it does not then follow that there was collusion with the Russians.  That is a leap without any logic behind it.

Just keep in mind that this is the same woman who stood up for President Bill Clinton and called impeachment a “coup d’etat” and an “unapologetic disregard for the voice of the people.”

Clearly, impeachment is not that.  It is constitutional and should be used when a president commits any misdemeanor, high crime or treason.

Interestingly enough, people gathered at her house earlier this month and protested and called for her impeachment.  They are right in doing so as Waters has been in the midst of corruption scandals herself, and if one is looking for ties to Russia, they need to look no further than Ms. Waters’ investments.

Waters is hell bent on making it her mission and goal to make sure that Trump does not remain president.  She’s looking for anything to impeach the man over but seems unable to produce any evidenceShe doesn’t even know what she’s saying sometimes when she calls for impeachment.

As I’ve said before, there are things that virtually every President could be impeached for, namely unconstitutional actions, including lobbing dozens of missiles into a foreign country without Congressional authorization when the united States has not been attacked and it is not in defense of the nation.  But this nonsense about Russian collusion is just making Waters appear to be more and more senile and past time for her to be removed from office.

Whistleblower: Obama Admin Knowingly Allowed MS-13 Gang Members In US

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom Outpost.

Absolutely nothing Bathhouse Barry has done surprises me because he is a two bit Muslim thug.

In the eight years him and Moochelle polluted the White House they did everything they could to undermine the security and safety of America .

According to Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, a whistleblower provided Customs and Border Protection documents from 2014 that detailed that the Obama administration knew of 16 people caught crossing the border were MS-13 gang members and then processed them and put them into US communities.

The individuals were teenagers at the time and were put into several juvenile homes throughout the US.

“CBP apprehended them, knew they were MS-13 gang members, and they processed and disbursed them into our communities,” Johnson said.

The Washington Times reports:

The gang members were part of the surge of UAC, or “unaccompanied alien children,” as the government labels them, who overwhelmed the Obama administration in 2014, leaving Homeland Security struggling to staunch the flow from Central America.

Officials at the time said the children should be treated as refugees fleeing horrific conditions back home — though security analysts said the children were prime recruiting territory for gangs already in the U.S.

Mr. Johnson said the image of UAC as little children is misleading. Out of nearly 200,000 UAC apprehended between from 2012 to 2016, 68 percent were ages 15, 16 or 17 — meaning older teens. The majority were also male, making them targets for gang recruiting.

Mr. Johnson revealed the documents at a hearing on the dangers posed by MS-13.

Of course, Democrats voiced concern, not over the fact that the Obama administration allowed these individuals into the country, but that the documents that expose their treason were released so quickly.

“I have concerns that these documents were released so quickly,” said Senator Claire McCaskill( D-MO), the ranking Democrat on the committee, who claims to want to get rid of gangs, but also says the release of the documents may hurt active investigations.

Say what?

The reality is that the Obama administration allowed tens of thousands of illegals into the country in 2014 who were knowingly crossing the border.  The majority were claimed to be children, but were not.  Furthermore, the Obama administration knew they were coming months ahead of time and solicited escorts for 65,000 illegal immigrant children in January of 2014.  In July of 2014, Border Patrol Agent Zack Taylor called the orchestrated immigration crisis that was occurring an “asymmetrical warfare” to destroy the US from within.

Just what kind of timeframe does Senator McCaskill think would be appropriate to release those documents, when we are all dead and gone, like the Kennedy assassination documents?

This story sounds eerily similar to one that took place under the Bush administration in 2004.  Julia Davis, a former Customs and Border Protections Officer, blew the whistle that the government had “very specific alerts” that on July 4, 2004 that members of Al-Qaeda would be attempting to cross the border from Mexico into the US.  However, when she tried to go to her superiors about it, Davis said every day when she came to work she was being investigated for one thing or another. She says everything they brought up to here was frivolous and ridiculous and she believes it was an attempt to get her fired to discredit anything she would say. All of this was because the FBI knew the information and DHS was embarrassed that the information came to them the way it did.

Within a period of two weeks, Davis was the subject of 19 investigations. By the time she sued Homeland Security there had been 54 investigations! On top of that, she was declared a domestic terrorist!

Davis’ home was raided by a 27 man SWAT team in a Blackhawk helicopter. She said they spent more time and utilized more man power raiding her home without a warrant than the government used to raid the alleged compound of Osama bin Laden.

Knowingly allowing these kinds of people into the US is criminal and is knowingly putting known dangerous people in our communities to begin to nest and thrive in America.  Someone needs to be held accountable for this treason.

Bombshell: “Blame Russia” Spin began “Within 24 Hours” of Election Loss

2 Comments

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Rush Limbaugh talked about this in his radio show on Friday.

On Thursday, Wikileaks tweeted out that the spin that ensued about Russian hacking was an idea that was “hatched” “within 24 hours” of her miserable election loss.

Wikileaks tweeted, “New book by ‘Shattered’ by Clinton insiders reveals that “blame Russia” plan was hatched “within twenty-four hours” of the election loss.”

New book by ‘Shattered’ by Clinton insiders reveals that “blame Russia” plan was hatched “within twenty-four hours” of election loss.

The tweet shared a portion of the contents of the book Shattered, written by Jonathan Allen, who also authored HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton.

“The authors detail how Clinton went out of her way to pass blame for her stunning loss on ‘Comey and Russia,'” the portion of the book read.  “‘She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way,’ a longtime Clinton confidant is quoted as saying.”

“The book further highlights how Clinton’s Russia-blame-game was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook, less than ‘within twenty-four hours’ after she conceded:

That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech.  Moook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up.  For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public.  Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

“The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan – pushing the press to cover how ‘Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen emails and Hillary’s own private-server imbroglio,’ while ‘hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her e-mail, which had created a cloud over her candidacy,’ the authors wrote.”

Was the plan to just cover for Clinton’s criminal actions as well as her pitiful loss, or was it more of an effort to make people question the legitimacy of the election of Donald Trump and incite people to violent protests?

It could be both.  However, Jack Burns writes:

To this date, we’ve still yet to see a single shred of evidence that Russia hacked the US elections. In fact, the US is trying so hard to prove this nonexistent hacking they allegedly bribed a Russian man — offering him cash, citizenship, and an apartment — if he confessed to hacking Clinton’s emails on behalf of Donald Trump. He refused.

The effects of those tactics, as well as the reportedly invented story of Russian meddling, culminated this week with the firing of FBI Director James Comey. His firing took place just as investigations into Russian election meddling were ramping up.

It remains to be seen if Trump’s firing of Comey will quell the wildfire of controversy sparked by what appears to be one candidate’s incessant desire to paint her opponent as nothing more than a pawn of the Russians, and painting herself as a hapless victim.

Clinton and her followers continue to push the narrative of Russian hacking as the reason for her loss.  In fact, she was doing it earlier this month when she blamed misogyny, FBI, Russia, and herself for the 2016 loss.

“It wasn’t a perfect campaign. There is no such thing,” Clinton said in a question-and-answer-session with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. “But I was on the way to winning until a combination of (FBI Director) Jim Comey’s letter on Oct. 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off.”

“He (Russian President Vladimir Putin) certainly interfered in our election,” Clinton said. “And it’s clear he interfered to hurt me and help my opponent.”

Yet, not one bit of evidence has been produced to affirm her assertion, not one.

“If the election were on October 27, I would be your president,” Clinton said.

Well, I’m not so sure about that either, but Clinton has shown signs of delusion in the past.  There is not doubt that one cannot be a Clinton and not lie.  It must run in the family.

Additionally, these lies continue to fuel the fire of anti-Trump activists in violent confrontations with Americans.  While there are things I have called Donald Trump out on, and I believe rightly so, this Russian hacking nonsense is just that, nonsense.  Now, everybody knows it.

 

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: