McMaster’s Work for Soros-Funded Group May Explain His Opposition to Trump


H/T Freedom OutPost.

I said it before and I will say it again it is time to Repeal and Replace H.R McMaster.

General H. R. McMaster has been opposed to virtually everything that President Trump wants, but why?  Many have asked this question, and now, we may finally have an answer as it has been revealed that McMaster served at a British think tank that was funded by one of George Soros’ groups.

It’s interesting to note that the group in question, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS),  was acknowledged by the Obama administration as being key to helping push the propaganda through the news media about the Iran nuclear deal.

According to the IISS website, McMaster is a “Former Consulting Senior Fellow” with expertise in Military History, Civil-Military Relations, Development and Security and Conflict and Conflict Prevention.

The site lists him as having served IISS from September 2006 to February 2017.

After taking over the National Security Council, McMaster has been involved in getting rid of those who speak out on Islamic jihad, as well as those who have spoken out on Iran and the Iran nuclear deal.

McMaster has also urged President Trump to recertify the nuclear agreement with Iran despite the fact that Iran gets everything it wants with nothing in return.

First, let’s not that McMaster was behind removing Stephen Bannon as National Security adviser.

McMaster also sent a letter to known liar Susan Rice telling her she could keep her security clearance, even though she has no business with such a clearance.

Just this past week, McMaster fired Richard T. Higgins, author of Catastrophic FailureBlindfolding America in the Face of Jihad and an outspoken critic about the faulty strategic assessment that is the basis for current U.S. security.  Higgins was reportedly a counter Islamic jihad expert.

Higgins was also a Bannon ally.

Keep in mind, McMaster is a man that engages in taqiyya on behalf of Islamic jihadis.

McMaster insists jihad terrorists were operating according to “an ideology that uses a perverted interpretation of religion to justify crimes against all humanity.”

He also told the staff of the National Security Council, in his first “all hands” staff meeting, that the label “radical Islamic terrorism” was not helpful because terrorists are “un-Islamic,” according to people who were in the meeting.

James Kouri reports on McMaster, IISS and the Ploughshares Fund:

IISS’s website contains a list of groups, corporations and government entities that provide funding to the think tank, including during the period of McMaster’s work there. Curiously missing from the page of donors is the controversial Ploughshares Fund, a grant-making group identified last year by the Obama White House as central in helping him sell the Iran nuclear deal to the news media.

“[President Barack Obama] knew full well how gullible members of the media truly are. He sold a bunch of willing reporters enough lies to spread to the American people. And McMaster added a helpful bit of credibility to the Iran pact sales pitch,” said former military intelligence operative and public safety commander Edward Mulhearn.

A previous investigation by this reporter showed Ploughshares has partnered with a who’s-who of the radical left, including Code Pink, the pro-Palestinian J Street, United for Peace & Justice, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and Demos, a progressive economic advisory group where Obama’s controversial former green jobs czar, Van Jones, has served on the board.

The group says its mission is to support the “smartest minds and most effective organizations to reduce nuclear stockpiles, prevent new nuclear states, and increase global security.” Ploughshares is in turn financed by Soros’s Open Society Institute, the Buffett Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation. Another Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, which is one of the largest contributors of the radical left. Tides is funded by Soros.

Soros has his tentacles in virtually everything anti-American going on in this country, and it seems that though many thought they got rid of Soros’ cronies from the White House, there still exists many of them, including General McMaster.

It’s time that Trump lose this guy too.


This New Piece Of Legislation Could Demolish State Gun Control Laws Across The Country

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Gun control does not work and it kills thousands of people.

Over the past century, there has been one undeniable trend working against gun rights. Put simply, as time goes on, it’s harder for a law abiding citizen to own and use a firearm, largely due to the proliferation of state and federal gun laws. A hundred years ago, one could own pretty much any firearm without restriction, and buy a firearm without even a background check (though of course, one could argue that a few of these laws are a good idea). Now it’s a heavily regulated industry.

And sure, there have been some victories for the Second Amendment. A few decades ago there were only a handful of states where it was fairly easy to attain a concealed carry permit, and even many deeply conservative states didn’t issue these permits at all. Now that situation has completely reversed and continues to improve. However, when you look at gun rights on a long enough timeline, it’s obvious that the Second Amendment has lost more than it has won, as state and federal laws have chipped away at our rights little by little.

Fortunately, there is a new piece of legislation that could significantly roll back the worst of these laws on the state level, in particular, the laws that were put in place under the Obama administration. The Second Amendment Guarantee Act, which was recently proposed by New York Congressman Chris Collins, could prove to be the most significant attack on gun control laws that we’ve seen in generations. According to a press release issued by Collins’ office:

“This legislation would protect the Second Amendment rights of New Yorkers that were unjustly taken away by Andrew Cuomo,” said Collins. “I am a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment and have fought against all efforts to condemn these rights. I stand with the law-abiding citizens of this state that have been outraged by the SAFE Act and voice my commitment to roll back these regulations.”

SAGA would provide an intimidating bulwark against gun control advocates in blue states. In a nutshell, it would prevent these states from passing restrictive laws that exceed the scope of federal gun laws.

In the Collins’ bill, States or local governments would not be able to regulate, prohibit, or require registration and licensing (that are any more restrictive under Federal law) for the sale, manufacturing, importation, transfer, possession, or marketing of a rifle or shotgun. Additionally, “rifle or shotgun” includes any part of the weapon including any detachable magazine or ammunition feeding device and any type of pistol grip or stock design.

Under this legislation, any current or future laws enacted by a state or political subdivision that exceeds federal law for rifles and shotguns would be void. Should a state violate this law, and a plaintiff goes to court, the court will award the prevailing plaintiff a reasonable attorney’s fee in addition to any other damages.

For decades, gun owners living in certain states have had their rights slowly stripped away by legislative bodies that repeatedly passed laws which are in violation of the Second Amendment, and they’ve done so almost completely unopposed. It’s the perfect example of what the Founders hoped to prevent in our society. They feared that the rights of the minority could be taken away by the majority, which is exactly what gun owners in leftists states have had to contend with.

But if SAGA passes, state governments will no longer be able to bully gun owners with their onerous and unconstitutional laws. Gun owners will finally have the same right to bear arms in every state of the union.

Maxine Waters Claims Public is “Getting Weary” Because Trump Hasn’t Been Impeached

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Maxine Waters is a certifiable nut job.

She is in a safe district in California so she knows she will have a job for life.

Rep. Maxine Waters continues to blabber about things she has no evidence in hopes the American people will hear it enough and begin to side with her.  Over the weekend she appeared on MSNBC to basically say she didn’t care whether her fellow Democrats were backing off talk of impeaching President Donald Trump or not, but then went on to claim that the American people were “getting weary” because he had not been impeached yet.

Somehow, I think she must be mixed up because plenty of Americans wanted Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah impeached for his long list of crimes.

“Congresswoman, on the subject of being more aggressive, you have openly talked about the fact that this president has put himself in a position where impeachment is on the table but your party, the Democratic party is very reluctant,” Morning Joy host Joy Reid said.  “The New York Times has an article out last week about how hesitant Democratic leadership, in particular, are to call for Donald Trump’s impeachment. In closing, why do you suppose that is?”

“I don’t know what the reticent is but I know this, that the American public is getting weary of all of these actions without enough being done by the elected officials who they elected to represent them,” Waters answered.  “I believe that this man has done enough for us to determine that we can connect the dots, that we can get the facts that will lead to impeachment.”

“I believe there was collusion,” she added, though she has absolutely no evidence of her claims.  “I think we have enough information about the meetings, the about the lying about those meetings to help us to understand that something was going on. There was an interaction there. And certainly I believe it was collusion, but if they just do their work and do their job, they will find out it was collusion.

“And I believe this president should be impeached,” she continued.  “I don’t care what others say about ‘it’s too soon, we don’t know, we think.’”

“I think that they’re letting the American public down by not delving deeper into what is going on with Jared Kushner and this back channeling, about the lies and his failure to disclose he had had these meetings, the same thing with sessions, failure to disclose about the meetings,” Waters concluded.  “What more do we need?”

Well, to be honest, failing to disclose something could be for a variety of reasons.  There could be intentional failing to disclose to hide something or there could simply be forgetfulness.  However, it does not then follow that there was collusion with the Russians.  That is a leap without any logic behind it.

Just keep in mind that this is the same woman who stood up for President Bill Clinton and called impeachment a “coup d’etat” and an “unapologetic disregard for the voice of the people.”

Clearly, impeachment is not that.  It is constitutional and should be used when a president commits any misdemeanor, high crime or treason.

Interestingly enough, people gathered at her house earlier this month and protested and called for her impeachment.  They are right in doing so as Waters has been in the midst of corruption scandals herself, and if one is looking for ties to Russia, they need to look no further than Ms. Waters’ investments.

Waters is hell bent on making it her mission and goal to make sure that Trump does not remain president.  She’s looking for anything to impeach the man over but seems unable to produce any evidenceShe doesn’t even know what she’s saying sometimes when she calls for impeachment.

As I’ve said before, there are things that virtually every President could be impeached for, namely unconstitutional actions, including lobbing dozens of missiles into a foreign country without Congressional authorization when the united States has not been attacked and it is not in defense of the nation.  But this nonsense about Russian collusion is just making Waters appear to be more and more senile and past time for her to be removed from office.

Whistleblower: Obama Admin Knowingly Allowed MS-13 Gang Members In US

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom Outpost.

Absolutely nothing Bathhouse Barry has done surprises me because he is a two bit Muslim thug.

In the eight years him and Moochelle polluted the White House they did everything they could to undermine the security and safety of America .

According to Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, a whistleblower provided Customs and Border Protection documents from 2014 that detailed that the Obama administration knew of 16 people caught crossing the border were MS-13 gang members and then processed them and put them into US communities.

The individuals were teenagers at the time and were put into several juvenile homes throughout the US.

“CBP apprehended them, knew they were MS-13 gang members, and they processed and disbursed them into our communities,” Johnson said.

The Washington Times reports:

The gang members were part of the surge of UAC, or “unaccompanied alien children,” as the government labels them, who overwhelmed the Obama administration in 2014, leaving Homeland Security struggling to staunch the flow from Central America.

Officials at the time said the children should be treated as refugees fleeing horrific conditions back home — though security analysts said the children were prime recruiting territory for gangs already in the U.S.

Mr. Johnson said the image of UAC as little children is misleading. Out of nearly 200,000 UAC apprehended between from 2012 to 2016, 68 percent were ages 15, 16 or 17 — meaning older teens. The majority were also male, making them targets for gang recruiting.

Mr. Johnson revealed the documents at a hearing on the dangers posed by MS-13.

Of course, Democrats voiced concern, not over the fact that the Obama administration allowed these individuals into the country, but that the documents that expose their treason were released so quickly.

“I have concerns that these documents were released so quickly,” said Senator Claire McCaskill( D-MO), the ranking Democrat on the committee, who claims to want to get rid of gangs, but also says the release of the documents may hurt active investigations.

Say what?

The reality is that the Obama administration allowed tens of thousands of illegals into the country in 2014 who were knowingly crossing the border.  The majority were claimed to be children, but were not.  Furthermore, the Obama administration knew they were coming months ahead of time and solicited escorts for 65,000 illegal immigrant children in January of 2014.  In July of 2014, Border Patrol Agent Zack Taylor called the orchestrated immigration crisis that was occurring an “asymmetrical warfare” to destroy the US from within.

Just what kind of timeframe does Senator McCaskill think would be appropriate to release those documents, when we are all dead and gone, like the Kennedy assassination documents?

This story sounds eerily similar to one that took place under the Bush administration in 2004.  Julia Davis, a former Customs and Border Protections Officer, blew the whistle that the government had “very specific alerts” that on July 4, 2004 that members of Al-Qaeda would be attempting to cross the border from Mexico into the US.  However, when she tried to go to her superiors about it, Davis said every day when she came to work she was being investigated for one thing or another. She says everything they brought up to here was frivolous and ridiculous and she believes it was an attempt to get her fired to discredit anything she would say. All of this was because the FBI knew the information and DHS was embarrassed that the information came to them the way it did.

Within a period of two weeks, Davis was the subject of 19 investigations. By the time she sued Homeland Security there had been 54 investigations! On top of that, she was declared a domestic terrorist!

Davis’ home was raided by a 27 man SWAT team in a Blackhawk helicopter. She said they spent more time and utilized more man power raiding her home without a warrant than the government used to raid the alleged compound of Osama bin Laden.

Knowingly allowing these kinds of people into the US is criminal and is knowingly putting known dangerous people in our communities to begin to nest and thrive in America.  Someone needs to be held accountable for this treason.

Bombshell: “Blame Russia” Spin began “Within 24 Hours” of Election Loss


H/T Freedom OutPost.

Rush Limbaugh talked about this in his radio show on Friday.

On Thursday, Wikileaks tweeted out that the spin that ensued about Russian hacking was an idea that was “hatched” “within 24 hours” of her miserable election loss.

Wikileaks tweeted, “New book by ‘Shattered’ by Clinton insiders reveals that “blame Russia” plan was hatched “within twenty-four hours” of the election loss.”

New book by ‘Shattered’ by Clinton insiders reveals that “blame Russia” plan was hatched “within twenty-four hours” of election loss.

The tweet shared a portion of the contents of the book Shattered, written by Jonathan Allen, who also authored HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton.

“The authors detail how Clinton went out of her way to pass blame for her stunning loss on ‘Comey and Russia,'” the portion of the book read.  “‘She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way,’ a longtime Clinton confidant is quoted as saying.”

“The book further highlights how Clinton’s Russia-blame-game was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook, less than ‘within twenty-four hours’ after she conceded:

That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech.  Moook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up.  For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public.  Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

“The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan – pushing the press to cover how ‘Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen emails and Hillary’s own private-server imbroglio,’ while ‘hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her e-mail, which had created a cloud over her candidacy,’ the authors wrote.”

Was the plan to just cover for Clinton’s criminal actions as well as her pitiful loss, or was it more of an effort to make people question the legitimacy of the election of Donald Trump and incite people to violent protests?

It could be both.  However, Jack Burns writes:

To this date, we’ve still yet to see a single shred of evidence that Russia hacked the US elections. In fact, the US is trying so hard to prove this nonexistent hacking they allegedly bribed a Russian man — offering him cash, citizenship, and an apartment — if he confessed to hacking Clinton’s emails on behalf of Donald Trump. He refused.

The effects of those tactics, as well as the reportedly invented story of Russian meddling, culminated this week with the firing of FBI Director James Comey. His firing took place just as investigations into Russian election meddling were ramping up.

It remains to be seen if Trump’s firing of Comey will quell the wildfire of controversy sparked by what appears to be one candidate’s incessant desire to paint her opponent as nothing more than a pawn of the Russians, and painting herself as a hapless victim.

Clinton and her followers continue to push the narrative of Russian hacking as the reason for her loss.  In fact, she was doing it earlier this month when she blamed misogyny, FBI, Russia, and herself for the 2016 loss.

“It wasn’t a perfect campaign. There is no such thing,” Clinton said in a question-and-answer-session with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. “But I was on the way to winning until a combination of (FBI Director) Jim Comey’s letter on Oct. 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off.”

“He (Russian President Vladimir Putin) certainly interfered in our election,” Clinton said. “And it’s clear he interfered to hurt me and help my opponent.”

Yet, not one bit of evidence has been produced to affirm her assertion, not one.

“If the election were on October 27, I would be your president,” Clinton said.

Well, I’m not so sure about that either, but Clinton has shown signs of delusion in the past.  There is not doubt that one cannot be a Clinton and not lie.  It must run in the family.

Additionally, these lies continue to fuel the fire of anti-Trump activists in violent confrontations with Americans.  While there are things I have called Donald Trump out on, and I believe rightly so, this Russian hacking nonsense is just that, nonsense.  Now, everybody knows it.


HR 899 Seeks to Abolish the Federal Department of Education

Leave a comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

Contact your House member at this link and tell them to sponsor this bill and get it passed.

We need to control education at the local level and not by some nameless faceless bureaucrat.

In another straightforward bill that would simply do what it says, Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) has introduced HR 899, which would abolish the unconstitutional Department of Education.

Congressman Massie is one of the few congressmen who has stood for the Constitution, even in the face of socialized medicine being pushed by the Speaker of the House and president of his own party.

Massie has introduced the HR899, which would abolish the Federal Department of Education by the end of 2018.  Here is the simple text of the bill.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2018.

The bill has 10 co-sponsors.  Among those are:

  1. Justin Amash (R-MI)
  2. Andy Biggs (R-AZ)
  3. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)
  4. Matt Gaetz (R-FL)
  5. Jody Hice (R-GA)
  6. Walter Jones (R-NC)
  7. Raul Labrador (R-ID)
  8. Ralph Lee Abraham (R-LA)
  9. Roger Williams (R-TX)
  10. Jeff Duncan (R-SC)

This bill was introduced as President Donald Trump announced his Secretary of Education Betsy DeVox.

“Neither Congress nor the President, through his appointees, has the constitutional authority to dictate how and what our children must learn,” said Massie.
“Unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. should not be in charge of our children’s intellectual and moral development,” Massie added.  “States and local communities are best positioned to shape curricula that meet the needs of their students. Schools should be accountable. Parents have the right to choose the most appropriate educational opportunity for their children, including homeschool, public school, or private school.”
“For years, I have advocated returning education policy to where it belongs – the state and local level,” said Rep. Walter Jones, an original co-sponsor.  “D.C. bureaucrats cannot begin to understand the needs of schools and its students on an individual basis. It is time that we get the feds out of the classroom, and terminate the Department of Education.”
“I’ve always been a proponent of empowering parents, teachers and local school boards who best know our children and their needs,” said Rep. Raul Labrador. “Eliminating the U.S. Department of Education is the most important step we in Congress can take in returning decision making to the local level.”
“Education of our students should lie primarily with parents, teachers, and state and local officials who know how to meet their individual needs best,” said freshman Rep. Andy Biggs. “Since its inception, the Department of Education has grown into an unrecognizable federal beast, and its policies have helped foster Common Core across the country. It is time the one-size-fits-all approach by the federal government is ended and authority is returned to the local level.”
For those who are against the Department of Education, remember the words of President Ronald Reagan on September 24, 1981:
“As a third step, we propose to dismantle two Cabinet Departments, Energy and Education. Both Secretaries are wholly in accord with this. Some of the activities in both of these departments will, of course, be continued either independently or in other areas of government. There’s only one way to shrink the size and cost of big government, and that is by eliminating agencies that are not needed and are getting in the way of a solution. Now, we don’t need an Energy Department to solve our basic energy problem. As long as we let the forces of the marketplace work without undue interference, the ingenuity of consumers, business, producers, and inventors will do that for us. Similarly, education is the principal responsibility of local school systems, teachers, parents, citizen boards, and State governments. By eliminating the Department of Education less than 2 years after it was created, we cannot only reduce the budget but ensure that local needs and preferences, rather than the wishes of Washington, determine the education of our children.”
Reagan made those remarks just one year after the Department of Education began.
Let President Trump demonstrate he is really outside of Washington and advance this bill in the same manner he has the RINOCare bill.  It will not only save taxpayers money and the dumbing down of their children, but it will be a constitutional move that parents everywhere can appreciate.


“Malicious” Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby to Face Civil Trial following Huge Loss to Freddie Gray Cops

1 Comment

H/T Freedom OutPost.

I hope she loses her law license and gets locked up.

 Marilyn Mosby is a classic example of affirmative failure and she is the face of corruption.     


Five of the six Baltimore police officers who were chargedin the death of Freddie Gray have won again in a lawsuit against Baltimore State Attorney Marilyn Mosby.  After putting the officers on trial without the evidence to back up the charges against them, a federal judge in Maryland is allowing a “malicious prosecution” case against her to move forward.

Officers Garrett Miller, Edward Nero, and William Porter, Sgt. Alicia White and Lt. Brian Rice have sued Mosby and Assistant Sheriff Samuel Cogen in federal court, alleging they knowingly brought false charges. Officer Caesar Goodson, who drove the van in which Gray was placed, was not a part of the lawsuit.

The Baltimore Sun reports:

U.S. District Judge Marvin J. Garbis ruled that claims including malicious prosecution, defamation, and invasion of privacy can move forward against Mosby and Assistant Sheriff Samuel Cogen, who wrote the statement of probable cause.

Mosby’s attorneys had said she has absolute prosecutorial immunity from actions taken as a state’s attorney. But Garbis noted that her office has said it conducted an independent investigation.

“Plaintiffs’ malicious prosecution claims relate to her actions when functioning as an investigator and not as a prosecutor,” Garbis wrote.

Other counts, such as false arrest, false imprisonment and abuse of process, were dismissed, as Garbis had signaled he would do at an October hearing. All claims against the state were also dismissed.

“Viewed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiffs, they present allegations that present a plausible claim that the defendants made false statements or omissions either knowingly or with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity,” Garbis wrote, believing that there was enough support by the plaintiffs to support the lawsuit.  “…the court is determining that the existence of this affirmative defense is not clear on the face of the complaint and a firm conclusion on the reasonableness of the probable cause determination requires greater factual development.”

Based on the claims of the officers, Garbis wrote, “no reasonable person could conclude that Plaintiffs failed to seat belt Gray due to gross or criminal negligence under the circumstances.”

“Rather, as Plaintiffs allege, the [rule on using seat belts] was new, they needed to quickly move the wagon to avoid growing crowds, Gray was physically uncooperative making it hard to position him in the wagon, and they did not know Gray was hurt,” Garbis added. “Plaintiffs have alleged facts adequate to present a plausible Fourth Amendment claim.”

Gray suffered a broken spine while in police custody.  He died a week later.

Mosby attempted to block the release of Freddie Gray’s autopsy so that she could continue to push a racially motivated prosecution.  However, the reason was clear why she wanted it kept secret.  The autopsy report didn’t confirm the story they were selling. By the way, Mosby didn’t even have the autopsy report until just before the charges were announced.

According to former Deputy State’s Attorney Page Croyder, “Her mind was already made up. Ditto with the police report.”

“In fact, Ms. Mosby was so hasty it appears she locked up two completely innocent officers,” Croyder added.  “She charged Freddie Gray’s arresting officers with ‘false imprisonment’ because she said the knife that Gray had on him was legal. In fact, as The Sun reported, the Police Task Force found it to be illegal after all. It was Ms. Mosby who had no probable cause to lock the arresting officers up, an injustice she could have easily avoided by taking her time.”

Mosby also directed police to target the very area where Gray was arrested in the first place.

According to the judge, prosecutors are usually immune from lawsuits, but not if they act as the investigator.

We’ll see what develops, but at least at this point, maybe Ms. Mosby is about to get hers.


Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: