Advertisements
Home

Why Can’t We Amend The Second Amendment?

2 Comments

Comrade James Heffernan needs a civics lesson you do not amend amendments.

Other amendments are passed to over write or strike down an amendment.

Comrade James needs to understand the Second Amendment is the guardian of the other nine amendments.

 

Source: Why Can’t We Amend The Second Amendment?

Advertisements

Democratic Bill Would Drug-Test The Rich

Leave a comment

Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) and every DemocRat in Congress need to be drug tested.

That way we could see if their delusional actions and words are drug induced.

I think many DemocRats have alcohol induced delusions and even more are due to mental defect.

 

Source: Democratic Bill Would Drug-Test The Rich

HUFFINGTON POST: 2nd Amendment Denies YOUR Attacker Due Process Rights

1 Comment

This is from The Daily Surge. 

To quote John Wayne from the movie The Green Berets.

Colonel Mike Kirby: Out here, due process is a bullet!

This takes the cake. File this under “Bat-crap-crazy”!

Justin Curmi, writing for the Huffington Post argues that the Bill of Rights is outdated and should be revised turned his attention to the Second Amendment.

Let’s start with the current and beloved Second Amendment:

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Ah, the sweet sound of freedom. America’s Second Amendment is rather unique to us. It was formulated by men who knew a thing or two about tyrannical governments and how difficult they are to get rid of.

See Revolutionary War if your school didn’t mention it.

The HuffPo article is stunning in its laying bare the true beliefs held by many liberals. The author believes that if you are attacked and kill or shoot your attacker in self-defense you are the criminal because you denied the attacker his right to due process.

Wait…what? It’s difficult to follow the logic because it is so flawed.

The Second Amendment is highly contested. There is no doubt that people do have the right to carry and have a stockpile of guns (“the right of the people to keep and bear arms”) and a state has the right to organize a well-regulated Militia. But, the main issue is on the right to self-defend with a firearm.

The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights. In addition, one’s mental capacity is a major factor in deciding whether a man or woman has the right to have a firearm. There are two reasons for ensuring mental capacity. First, one of the Five Aims is to ensure domestic tranquility and there can be no tranquility if one does not have the capacity. Second, if one’s brain is distorting his or her reality, they do not have the proper reasoning and deduction skills to use a firearm.

Predicable. If we insert diminished capacity into the argument the liberals can deny the Second Amendment right to thousands of Americans. They are doing it with many returning veterans. Go to a shrink to get right…lose your Second Amendment rights.

Re-read the Second Amendment now. Do you see anything in there about mental capacity?

Mr. Curmi goes on to argue that citizens are not trained enough to know when to use a firearm, or when not to.

A gun for civilians is a weapon for a revolution and not for ordinary use. The belief that a gun is a useful tool to protect one is counter-intuitive because guns get into the hands of people who use them for horrible reasons. In addition, there are reasons why cops are trained to use a firearm in stressful situations. It is not to keep their mind at ease or anything of that sort, but to be able to fire accurately at the target in the correct location. It is immensely difficult to fire when under pressure.

This is why we can’t have nice things.

Mr. Curmi and his sort, genuinely believe if you are in a quiet parking ramp and you get jumped by some rapist or robber that you won’t know where to aim. So basically, just roll over and be victimized.

Thank God for the Second Amendment and our right to shoot that SOB double tap to the chest at close range.

This article by Mr. Curmi is good fodder the Huffington Post. Re-writing our Constitution to do away our rights truly is lauded in liberal circles.

That is why those of us who believe in our self-evident rights must stay vigilant and push back against this junk for all of our days. Teach the next generation the joy of being able to shoot a gun and defend yourself.

Police response times average 7-8 minutes in much of America. A whole lot of bad can happen in 8 minutes. Defending yourself is the only way to stop violence in your path.

Shoot straight and keep your powder dry.
Read more at http://dailysurge.com/2016/04/liberal-argues-2nd-amendment-defending-gun-illegal-denies-attacker-due-process/

HuffPo Declares That Americans Using Christmas Lights Prevents Lesser Nations from Having Electricity

Leave a comment

This is from Freedom OutPost.

The village idiots at the Huffington Post have decreed Americans are the cause of no electricity on the third world sewers.

If, like many Americans, you decorated your home with Christmas lights and put lights on your Christmas tree, the idiots at the Huffington Post claim you are exceeding the total amount of energy just for these lights than the energy use of entire countries with poor economies. Citing the information contained here, the solution is pretty simple — turn off those lights. Scrooges and Grinches want to make sure you are feeling guilty about your decorations at Christmas.

The study, if you can call it that, done by Todd Moss and Priscilla Agyapong, pulled together data from a 2008 US Department of Energy Information Agency study and used census data from 2010 – 2011, to inform greedy wasteful Americans, that the energy used during Christmas to light decorations would run 14 million refrigerators and exceeded the national electrical consumption of countries such as El Salvador, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Nepal, etc.

The take away: if Americans would stop being greedy and wasteful, the population of lower economic nations in Africa could build more power plants and operate refrigerators.

We are supposed to adopt the stance that America and other wealthy nations are depriving these lesser economy nations of resources to advance. However, since when is America responsible for the economies of other nations when this nation always runs a trade deficit. How would using less energy here give more energy to these lesser economically developed countries? How would turning off Christmas lights result in mismanaged governments of African nations result in better management?

Does not the US provide these lesser nations with money to help support the people? Where is that money going? Why wasn’t the money used to build power plants? The money is going into the pockets of the greedy government officials in Africa who let their people starve, die and suffer to enrich themselves. How is that a problem for America? Because of these greedy, dictatorial bums, the United States turns around and sends food to help feed the needy. Not to mention, the money given to charities to provide services their own government should provide.

If these HuffPo shills are concerned about resource usage here in the United States, then maybe we should start with ceasing NASCAR races. Think about all that wasted fuel. Next, we can stop all football, hockey, basketball, and baseball games, especially at night. Wonder what that would save? It’s possible the movie industry could cut some corners, as well as Hussein Obama and his flamboyant excesses on the taxpayer dime. Turn off all the lights in Times Square, the Rockefeller Center, and Madison Square Gardens with cessation of all events. Once that is done, we can transfer all our saved energy to these foreign nations.

It’s ridiculousness at its best. America is not responsible for these nations’ economies, their greedy, entitled dictatorial leaders who mismanage the government to enrich themselves, or their lack of drive and ambition to change their nation using some capitalistic techniques. In fact, the United States should cease monetary support to foreign governments period, as it is outside the Constitution’s enumerated powers of the central body.

Maybe, we all need to turn off our brains for just a bit to store some intellect to transfer to some of the people at HuffPo. Oh, wait. If that could even be done, the recipients would complain it was not enough as they tried to figure out how to put a square peg in a round hole, declaring the entire time that it does fit, they’ve seen it fit, and it’s our fault no matter what.
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/huffpo-declares-that-americans-using-christmas-lights-prevents-lesser-nations-from-having-electricity/#F5vcF4bio3OUv57w.99

 

Typing This Racist Term Into Google Takes You To The White House…

Leave a comment

This is from Western Journalism.

I tried the search word and lo and behold, it does come up as The White House.

I also used both versions of the search word.

I am not sure how long this will work.

 

Some inappropriate results are surfacing in Google Maps…

 

Social media is lighting up due to a post by a Howard University alum who noticed when you type “Nigga House” into Google Maps, the result is the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

According to the Huffington Post, the screenshot was first posted on GroupMe and later tweeted by Bomani Buckhalter, a Howard University alumni.

Howard is located in Washington, DC and is an historically all-black university.

Twitter-Nig-House

“It is location based, so [for] some of the students that are not currently in D.C., the search result was different. However, even if you’re not in D.C., ‘nigga house Washington D.C.’ shows the same result,” Buckhalter told the HuffPost.

The HuffPost noted dropping the “a” and spelling the racial slur with an “er” yields the same result.

The Daily Caller contacted Google regarding the racist and bizarre result. A spokesman replied, “Some inappropriate results are surfacing in Google Maps that should not be, and we apologize for any offense this may have caused. Our teams are working to fix this issue quickly.”

As of the writing of this article, the issue had not been corrected.

 

HALF OF OFFICERS SHOT IN 2013 WERE KILLED BY PEOPLE BARRED FROM GUN POSSESSION

Leave a comment

This is from Breitbarts Big Government.

This sums up the facts about gun control.

 

sam-elliot-gun-control

www.floppingaces.net

 

FBI stats show that 26 police officers were shot and killed with guns in 2013. Of these, half were killed by people who were completely barred from gun possession.

According to Huffington Post, 13 of those who shot and killed officers in 2013 “were prohibited from possessing guns in the first place.” They faced 100 percent gun control due to “prior criminal convictions, mental illness or other factors,” yet they ignored the prohibitions against gun possession and stole or otherwise acquired the guns they used to carry out their heinous deeds.

For example, one of the 13 was a 25-year-old named Eriese Tisdale. He was driving a car in St. Lucie County, Florida–although he did not have a driver’s license–and freaked out when Sgt. Gary Morales turned on his lights to pull him over. Tisdale told WPTV 5 that he did not stop when Morales tried to pull him over. He said he kept thinking Morales was trying to pull him over because he was black and had “dreads.”

Morales used his car to try stop Tisdale and Tisdale eventually complied. Morales ordered him out of car, and Tisdale argued, saying he had not done anything wrong. He finally got out and shot and killed Morales.

When police searched Tisdale’s apartment, they found a stolen gun and another gun that had been illegally altered.

We saw a similar incident on May 9, when Hattiesburg officers Benjamin Deen and Liquori Tate were shot. Two of the suspects arrested in connection with those deaths are felons completely barred from gun possession, yet Deen and Liquori are dead.

From the FBI report on officer deaths in 2013 to the May 9 shooting deaths of Deen and Liquori, the lesson is the same–gun control does not stop criminals from acting out their criminality. Leaving such criminals loose on the streets while trusting gun control to magically curtail their behavior only puts the lives of officers and other innocents at risk.

 

Just In: Feds Deny Brinley’s Connection to Prison Gang

Leave a comment

This is from Joe or America.

We have a racist cop hating president and attorney general, so denying the connection to a radical black gang is not surprising.

After all the said gang is racist cop haters just like Holder and Obama.

 

As the details are still being sorted, the Huffington Post reports a contradiction about the probable connection Isaaiyl Brinley has to the prison gang known since the mid-1960s as Black Guerrilla Family.

h/t: Huffington Post

Two New York City police officers were shot dead “execution style” in Brooklyn on Saturday. Not much is known about the gunman, who was identified by officials as Ismaaiyl Brinsley, 28, except that he was a suspected gang member from Baltimore who allegedly posted on social media that he wanted revenge for the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, two black men that died at the hands of police.

According to the New York Daily News, Brinsley, who was pronounced dead, had ties to the “Black Guerilla Family” prison gang, which is also known as “Black Family” or the “Black Vanguard.” The gang was formed in 1966 by Black Panther member George Jackson at the San Quentin State Prison in California, and soon grew into a multi-million dollar business with chapters stretching from Los Angeles to Kansas City and Detroit.

“BGF has been talking about getting back at cops for Eric Garner and Ferguson,” a source told the News, which also reported on a suspected Black Guerrilla Family plot to kill NYPD officers in the wake of a grand jury decision not to indict an officer in Eric Garner’s chokehold death earlier this summer.

A federal law enforcement official, however, told the Baltimore Sun that Brinsley had no known ties to the BGF.

The gang is affiliated with leftist groups, including the Black Liberation Army, Symbionese Liberation Army, Weather Underground, Red Guerrilla Family, and Chicano Liberation Front, and one of its stated missions is the overthrow of the U.S. government. Gang members identify with tattoos and symbols including the letters “B-G-F,” the corresponding numbers of the alphabet 2-7-6, a crossed machete and rifle, and a black dragon climbing a San Quentin prison tower, according to Police Mag. It is structured on a paramilitary ranking system (its leader holds the rank of Supreme Commander), and many of its members use the Swahili language to communicate.

The gang still operates today under James (Doc) Holiday, who was incarcerated in 1987. According to Police Mag, BGF actively recruits members from other gangs (Crips, Bloods, N.O.I., Black Panthers, or members of the 415 gang) and encourages them to continue to claim their prior affiliation. Doing so allows the BGF to operate covertly within the prison system.

Last year, Baltimore officials cracked down on the gang because it essentially took over the Baltimore City Detention Center, after members allegedly extorted people, intimidated witnesses and dealt drugs with the aid of correction officers. Five corrections officers, two inmates, and a kitchen worker are currently on trial in the ongoing racketeering conspiracy case.

The Baltimore FBI office issued a memo on Friday warning that the BGF was targeting “white cops” in Maryland, per the Sun. The memo, based on a contact who had given officials reliable information in the past, said the plan was to target white officers in order to “send a message.”

Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2014/12/just-feds-deny-brinleys-connection-prison-gang/

IS OBAMA BLACKMAILING BOEHNER?

1 Comment

This is from World Net Daily.

If Obama had any dirt on John Boehner he would be blackmailing Boehner.

After all, that is the Chicago Thug way.

 

WASHINGTON – He drinks a bit. That is well-chronicled.

The tabloids have splashed headlines about torrid affairs, including one with a lobbyist.

And, of course, he cries in public.

But is there more to the personal story of House Speaker John Boehner that would explain his funding of Obamacare and the president’s executive action providing amnesty for millions of illegal aliens in his budget accommodation with Democrats?

Enter the ubiquitous Matt Drudge who tweeted Friday: “Obama got EVERYTHING. NSA dirt on Boehner must be incredible. Chicago wins.”

Obama got EVERYTHING. NSA dirt on Boehner must be incredible. Chicago wins.

Another Proposal to “Improve” the Second Amendment, by Rendering it Toothless

1 Comment

This is from Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

The Second Amendment is not broken so it does not need fixed.

The Second Amendment is the guardian of the other nine amendments. 

 

 

By Kurt Hofmann, May 7th 2014
JPFO writer contributor, © 2014.

 

A few weeks ago we talked about retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’ wish to “fix” the Second Amendment, by amending it to guarantee the people’s right to keep and bear arms only when serving in “the militia.” Now, “progressive” writer Sanjay Sanghoee is proposing his own “update” to the Second Amendment.

Sanjay Sanghoee

He justifies this, of course, with pious hand-wringing about “gun violence,” and for that, he knows that there is no better source of innocent blood to exploit than the murdered children of Sandy Hook Elementary. But the Second Amendment is also to be disparaged, heargues in his Huffington Post op-ed, because its purpose of protecting the people’s means of effective resistance against a tyrannical government is no longer relevant, because no number of civilians with small arms can resist the mightiest military superpower on Earth:

So does the Second Amendment really serve a useful purpose in modern society and should it be modified to suit our times?

The answer to the former depends on whether you imagine that the Second Amendment somehow protects Americans from a tyrannical government. It does not. No matter how many weapons private citizens stockpile or even what type of guns they own, a private militia can never match the firepower of the U.S. government. Simply put, if our government ever decides to suppress the citizenry by force, privately held guns won’t be the factor that makes a difference.

We’ve heard that many times before, of course, and now we’re hearing it again, just weeks after determined militia men and women faced down that same government and sent them packing.

A major part of the “problem,” according to Sanghoee, is Americans’ “blind adherence to the Constitution.” That, evidently, is a favorite theme of Sanghoee’s, who once commented (in response to pushback against yet another of his “gun control” screeds) that, “People need to get off their literal following of the constitution [sic] for every single thing,” apparently believing that we should treat the guarantees of our fundamental human rights, as enumerated in the Bill of Rights, as figures of speech.

JPFO contributor David Codrea notes that Sanghoee’s disdain for Americans’ reverence for the Constitution is a rather curious position for him, as a naturalized American citizen, to espouse, given his oath to “support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same . . . .”

So what, exactly, would this “update” to the Second Amendment entail? He doesn’t say, although he provides a hint, when he implies tolerance for (emphasis added) “private citizens keeping a handgun at home for personal protection or hunters owning a rifle, but those exceptions can be covered without the overarching sweep of the Second Amendment.” If allowing citizens to keep a single handgun, or a single hunting rifle, is to be characterized as “exceptions,” then the general rule sounds very much like a comprehensive gun ban.

We also know that he evidently believes that Justice Stevens’ proposed “fix” to the Second Amendment lets gun owners off too easily:

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens recently suggested adding the words “when serving in [the militia]” to update the Second Amendment but that won’t necessarily work either since the definition of ‘militia’ itself is debatable.

It appears, then, that he is concerned that if Stevens’ proposal were to become reality, we pesky gun owners might go ahead and actually form militias, and thereby regain the protections embodied in the Second Amendment that he wants to deny us. Sanghoee would probably refer to this as the “militia loophole.”

No statist claptrap about the need to “update” the Constitutional guarantee of our fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms would be complete without an Orwellian “Opposite Day” utter inversion of reality, and Sanghoee does not disappoint:

Ironically, the problem with the Second Amendment is that by being so broad, it actually makes it vulnerable to interpretation and sets up the conflict between the right to bear arms (reasonable) and the ability to pose a serious threat to civilized society (unreasonable). Limiting its scope, therefore, could strengthen the spirit of the Amendment by removing its undesirable consequences.

Yep–he is kindly offering to “strengthen the spirit” of the Second Amendment, by limiting it to the point of irrelevance. Thanks, but no thanks, Sanjay.

I once wrote some commentary responding to Sanghoee’s piteous inquiry, “Where is Gun Control?” As it happens, JPFO can provide him with a comprehensive history of preciselywhere it has been for most of the last century. That’s probably far more truth than he wants to hear, though.

The 25 Stupidest Liberal Quotes Of The Last Decade

Leave a comment

This is from Joe For America.

This says it all.

 

 

25) Seniors love getting junk mail. It’s sometimes their only way of communicating or feeling like they’re part of the real world. — Harry Reid

24)The number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S. — Joe Biden

23) I took a poo in the woods hunched over like an animal. It was awesome. — Drew Barrymore

22) Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama cannot win, and they are put in place to assure a victory by Mitt Romney… this is the plan of all the insurance companies that are owned by Mormon interests. It is unfolding as the Mormon Church planned over the last fifty years. —Roseanne Barr

21) I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7 — building 7, which collapsed in on itself — it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade [Center] 1 and 2 got hit by planes — 7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible. — Rosie O’Donnell talks Trutherism

20) Isn’t it a little racist to call it Black Friday? — Joy Behar

19) A good place to start a more civil dialog would be for my Republican colleagues in the House to change the name of the bill they have introduced to repeal health care reform. The bill, titled the “Repeal the Job Killing Health Care Law Act,” was set to come up for a vote this week, but in the wake of Gabby’s shooting, it has been postponed at least until next week. Don’t get me wrong — I’m not suggesting that the name of that one piece of legislation somehow led to the horror of this weekend — but is it really necessary to put the word “killing” in the title of a major piece of legislation? — Chellie Pingree, Congresswoman (D-ME)

18) The Republican Party is saying that the President of the United States has bosses, that the union bosses this President around, the unions boss him around. Does that sound to you like they are trying to consciously or subconsciously deliver the racist message that, of course, of course a black man can’t be the real boss? — Lawrence O’Donnell

17) Herman Cain is probably well-liked by some of the Republicans because it hides the racist elements of the Republican Party, conservative movement and tea party movement. People like Karl Rove like to keep the racism very covert and so Herman Cain provides this great opportunity so he can say, ‘Look: This is not a racist anti-immigrant, anti-female, anti-gay movement. Look: We have a black man.’ And look he’s polling well and he won a straw poll. — Janeane Garofalo

16) If we want to keep our reproductive rights, we must be willing to tell our stories, to be willing and able to say, “I love my life, but I wish my mother had aborted me.” — Lynn Beisner, the Guardian

15) Is there such a thing as a man-made stroke? In other words, did someone do this to (Democratic Senator Tim Johnson)? …I know what this [Republican] party is capable of. — Joy Behar on The View

14) Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them. — Mary Frances Berry, former Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights

13) Now, people when I say that look at me and say, ‘What are you talking about, Joe? You’re telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?’ The answer is yes, that’s what I’m telling you. — Joe Biden

12) Those flowers were picked by illegal immigrants. And they’re not voting for you, b*tch. — Joy Behar after receiving flowers from Sharon Angle

11) During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. — Al Gore

10) Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs. — Nancy Pelosi

9) Watching both the health care and climate/energy debates in Congress, it is hard not to draw the following conclusion: There is only one thing worse than one-party autocracy, and that is one-party democracy, which is what we have in America today. One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. — Thomas Friedman

8) I root for hurricanes. When, courtesy of the Weather Channel, I see one forming in the ocean off the coast of Africa, I find myself longing for it to become big and strong–Mother Nature’s fist of fury, Gaia’s stern rebuke. Considering the havoc mankind has wreaked upon nature with deforesting, stripmining, and the destruction of animal habitat, it only seems fair that nature get some of its own back and teach us that there are forces greater than our own. — James Wolcott, Vanity Fair

7) Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. — Barack Obama

6) The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied. — Jeremiah Wright

5) How do we know when someone like Hasan is going to make his move and do we know he’s an Islamist until he’s made his move? He makes a phone call or whatever, according to Reuters right now. Apparently he tried to contact al-Qaida. Is that the point at which you say, “This guy is dangerous?” That’s not a crime to call up al-Qaida, is it? Is it? I mean, where do you stop the guy? — Chris Matthews

4) The medical term for Down Syndrome is Trisomy-21 or Trisomy-g. It is often shortened in medical slang to Tri-g. Is it not perfectly possible that the very name given to this poor child, being reared by Bristol, is another form of mockery of his condition, along with the “retarded baby” tag? And does the way in which this poor child was hauled around the country on a book tour, being dragged out in front of flash photographs in the middle of the night, barely clothed, suggest someone who actually cares for children with special needs, or rather sees them as a way to keep the spotlight on her? — Andrew Sullivan

3) I propose a limitation be put on how many sqares [sic] of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don’t want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. — Sheryl Crow at the Huffington Post

2) Had a powerful meditation just now — caused an earthquake in Southern California. …Was meditating on Shiva mantra & earth began to shake. Sorry about that. —Deepak Chopra thinks his meditation can cause earthquakes

1) My fear is that the whole island (of Guam) will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize. —Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson

 

RightWingNews.com
Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2014/03/25-stupidest-liberal-quotes-last-decade/#BDFpfcLtoCtKXWww.99

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: