Advertisements
Home

Dain Bramaged: Joy Behar Talks Sh*t About Mike Pence But Defends Louis Farrakhan

Leave a comment

H/T Clash Daily.

Joyless Behar is a moron of the highest degree.

Carrying on their near-perfect record of being on the Wrong side of every issue.

What should we really expect?

This is the same show that tried to exonerate Roman Polanski, saying he had not committed ‘rape-rape’ by drugging and sodomizing a 13-year-old girl.

Watch Joy tap-dance around the Women’s March leaders t00-close association with prominent and open race-baiter Louis Farrakhan.

Contrast that to how, Joy Behar threw that ‘little sliver’ of America between New York and LA under the bus by openly mocking Christian belief.

Behar chimed in, adding that hearing from Jesus is actually called “mental illness.” Pence himself didn’t appreciate the comments and slammed ABC News.

“To have ABC maintain a broadcast forum that compared Christianity to mental illness is just wrong,” Pence said during an appearance on C-SPAN following the controversial remarks. “It is simply wrong for ABC to have a television program that expresses that kind of religious intolerance.”

The Media Research Center launched a campaign to hold “View” co-hosts accountable for spewing “anti-Christian bigotry,” and ABC received over 30,000 phone calls from angry viewers.
Source: FoxNews

Allegedly, Joy Behar phoned up the Vice President and apologized to him.

That is a cowardly ‘retraction’.

She made a public allegation. An honest apology would require a public retraction. AND she would likewise apologize to all other Christians she maligned with that statement.

And only a few days later, as to prove how deep ‘in the tank’ she really is… she weighed in on Louis Farrakan hobknobbing with high-level Democrats.

Why should we care? Well, he’s a racist, for one. He has a history of inciting violence, for another.

He claimed to regret inciting the death of Malcom X, which was perpetrated by his followers.

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan admits in a 60 Minutes interview broadcast Sunday and reported on Wednesday’s CBS Evening News that his incendiary rhetoric played a role in the 1965 assassination of civil rights leader Malcolm X.
Farrakhan makes the statements to Malcolm X’s daughter, Atallah Shabazz, and 60 Minutes Correspondent Mike Wallace.
Source: CBS

He later, infamously, called for 10,000 men to rise up in violence against white men.

 

 

 

He has called Hitler a ‘great man’. And he has made eggregious claims about Jews that would be loudly denounced if they came from the mouth of David Duke.

So when people started noticing Democrats at his meetings, it raised some eyebrows.

Obama’s smiling photo with him and the Congressional Black Caucus in 2005 was suppressed.

The’Scandal Free’ POTUS: Photo Of Obama With Farrakhan Was Buried For 18 Years

Maxine Waters was personally acknowledged in the audience by him during a speech.

The convention, which took place in California in 2002, is just the latest tie to emerge between Democrats and the Nation of Islam, a black nationalist group known for being viciously anti-Semitic.

“We have Maxine Waters here,” Farrakhan told the convention audience, gesturing to the seats behind him, “our great congresswoman from this area.” The audience cheered Waters’ name.
DailyCaller

Related: Seven Louis Farrakhan Quotes On Jews, Gays And White People

THIS is the guy whose event one of the Womens’ March Chairs was called out for attending.

Mass movements are sewn together from a wide variety of sources, so they often sweep in unwanted companions as they move toward their goals. No one, however, expected to discover that three Women’s March co-chairs—Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez, and Tamika Mallory—had ties to Farrakhan. More mysterious and disturbing was the extended reluctance of the Women’s March, nearly a year since it became public, to acknowledge Farrakhan’s extremist views and disassociate themselves from them.
It all came to a head last week, after Farrakhan delivered his address to the annual Nation of Islam gathering for Saviours’ Day, the sect’s three-day holiday honoring its founder, Wallace Fard Muhammad. Farrakhan denounced “Satanic Jews,” said that “when you want something in this world, the Jew holds the door,” and at the climax of his speech, proclaimed, “White folks are going down, and Satan is going down, and Farrakhan by God’s grace has pulled the cover off of that Satanic Jew—and I’m here to say, your time is up.”
Source: The Atlantic

Which brings us back to Joy Behar.

Who is being Criticized in this story? The left, and in particular, prominent Left-leaning activists with strong power bases in both the women’s movement as well as Islam, and whichever racial activist groups align themselves with Farrakhan’s hatred.

Behar has no hesitation throwing terms like racism, sexism and homophobia and anyone on the Right, whether she can back up her claims or not.

But let a Left get caught — in the act — and Joy can’t backpedal fast enough.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Republican Jewish Coalition demands resignation of Democratic leaders with ties to Farrakhan

Leave a comment

H/T Fox News.

The DemocRats mentioned in this article will never resign or condemn Calypso Louie Farraconman(Farrakhan) because he  speaks for them.

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan has answered those who denounced as anti-Semitic his recent “Jews are my enemy” quote with another broadside, this time tweeting a video clip where he says “The Jews have control over those areas of government” – in referring to the FBI.

The clip featuring the latest remark was posted to Farrakhan’s official Twitter account on March 7, well after the controversy erupted over the remarks made earlier, at a Chicago event on Feb. 25. Those comments brought new attention to Farrakhan’s links with seven members of the Congressional Black Congress, as well as to Women’s March co-president Tamika Mallory, who attended the Farrakhan event, and posted a photo of herself with Farrakhan on her Instagram feed after the speech.

The controversy sparked calls by many Republicans for Democrats to vigorously denounce Farrakhan’s remarks. Others who quickly condemned Farrakhan’s remarks also asked pointed questions on why much of the media was either slow to report the story, or have chosen to ignore it entirely.

farrakhan tweet 38

Farrakhan tweeted this week: “The FBI has been the worst enemy of Black advancement. The Jews have control over those agencies of government.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition on Tuesday called on the seven members of the CBC members to resign. The coalition’s director, Matt Brooks, told Fox News the Democratic leaders with ties to Farrakhan have been quick to denounce President Donald Trump and the GOP for remarks or actions that they view as bigoted, but overlook blatant racism and anti-Semitism when it comes to Farrakhan.

“There’s clearly a double standard,” Brooks said, then amended that to say “No, there’s a double double-standard. Not only do you get the progressive left wing and more centrist Democrats who aren’t shy about criticizing President Trump or branding the Republican Party as white nationalists or neo-Nazis, but when it comes to condemning Louis Farrakhan, they’re silent.”

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif.  (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, file)

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California

The members called on to resign were the subject of a story in The Daily Caller, which reported a review of videos, photographs and other documents revealed the lawmakers have had ties to Farrakhan. They are Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Maxine Waters of California, Danny Davis of Illinois, Al Green of Texas, Barbara Lee of California, Andre Carson of Indiana, and Gregory Meeks of New York.

On Thursday, Meeks tweeted “Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic messages are upsetting & unacceptable. I always condemn hate speech of any kind. Also upsetting that right-wing blogs suggest otherwise & try making this a black vs. Jewish community issue. Still waiting for those blogs to condemn Trump’s racist remarks.”

Sen. Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat who is not among those with ties to Farrakhan, took to Twitter to condemn the Nation of Islam leader and to say that he must be rejected, not courted. “This is unacceptable in a progressive coalition or any political coalition. Anti-Semitism has no place in American society. We must reject this, left right and center.”

Besides Meeks, Ellison has also condemned Farrakhan for his divisive and hostile rhetoric. Davis denounced anti-Semitism, but also praised Farrakhan, according to the Daily Caller.

In a statement on the Republican Jewish Coalition’s website calling for them to step down, Brooks wrote: “Anti-Semitism is unacceptable. Farrakhan is the moral equivalent of a leader of the KKK. If it was discovered that members of Congress had met with the leader of the KKK, they would need to resign. In this case, for meeting with, and embracing, Louis Farrakhan, nothing short of resignation is acceptable from these seven Democrats.”

 

Earlier this week, a spokesman for Ellison, who is the deputy director of the Democratic National Committee, told Fox News: “Rep. Ellison has repeatedly disavowed anti-Semitism and bigotry, since his first campaign for Congress in 2006.”

The spokesman referred Fox News to a 12-year-old statement Ellison made when he came under fire for ties to Farrakhan, in which he said he erroneously dismissed concerns the Nation of Islam leader was anti-Semitic, and said he never shared “their hateful views” of “Jews, gays, or any other group.”

Democratic National Chair candidate, Keith Ellison, addresses the audience as the Democratic National Committee holds an election to choose their next chairperson at their winter meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. February 25, 2017. REUTERS/Chris Berry - RC1CDF70D6E0

Rep. Keith Ellison, Deputy Director, Democratic National Committee

Recently, Ellison again was in the spotlight after the Wall Street Journal reported that he had attended a meeting in 2013 with Muslim leaders where Farrakhan was present. Ellison, who was the first Muslim elected to Congress, said he did not know who would be there and that his decision to go “was not an endorsement of the political views of other attendees.”

Davis, the Illinois congressman, said in a February interview with the Daily Caller that Farrakhan is an “outstanding human being” and said he sees the minister on a regular basis. Days later, Davis’s office released a statement denouncing anti-Semitism as being “antithetical to everything I believe and everything that I work for on a daily basis.”

Reactions to the call for resignations has varied, even among groups sharing similar views on many important matters.

In Jewishpress.com, writer David Israel argued that while Brooks was right to denounce Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism, he should not call for the resignation of lawmakers who have been pro-Israel, and are crucial congressional allies to Jews.

“Their Jewish voters and their Jewish colleagues in the Democratic party are entitled to an explanation about those Farrakhan meetings,” Israel wrote in Jewishpress.com, “but in politics, meeting a man, disturbing and loathsome as he may be, is not the same as endorsing his views. Pro-Israel Democrats have had enough trouble finding allies within the Black Caucus in Congress to face the Palestinian and BDS threats, to name just two.”

BDS refers to the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign that says Israel is responsible for violations of Palestinian rights and international law.

But Brooks rejected the contention lawmakers should be given a pass for “breaking bread with Farrakhan” because of other ways they can be useful to constituents.

“These [lawmakers] are leaders of the Democratic Party,” Brooks said. “If that’s enough for [David Israel], then why isn’t there the same standard when they criticize Donald Trump and other Republicans are who friends of Israel?”

“None of these Democrats went into those meetings with Farrakhan not knowing who he was,” Brooks said. “At some point they made the decision that they were going to go ahead and meet with him.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition on Tuesday called on the seven members of the CBC members to resign. The coalition’s director, Matt Brooks, told Fox News the Democratic leaders with ties to Farrakhan have been quick to denounce President Donald Trump and the GOP for remarks or actions that they view as bigoted, but overlook blatant racism and anti-Semitism when it comes to Farrakhan.

“There’s clearly a double standard,” Brooks said, then amended that to say “No, there’s a double double-standard. Not only do you get the progressive left wing and more centrist Democrats who aren’t shy about criticizing President Trump or branding the Republican Party as white nationalists or neo-Nazis, but when it comes to condemning Louis Farrakhan, they’re silent.”

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif.  (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, file)

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California

The members called on to resign were the subject of a story in The Daily Caller, which reported a review of videos, photographs and other documents revealed the lawmakers have had ties to Farrakhan. They are Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Maxine Waters of California, Danny Davis of Illinois, Al Green of Texas, Barbara Lee of California, Andre Carson of Indiana, and Gregory Meeks of New York.

On Thursday, Meeks tweeted “Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic messages are upsetting & unacceptable. I always condemn hate speech of any kind. Also upsetting that right-wing blogs suggest otherwise & try making this a black vs. Jewish community issue. Still waiting for those blogs to condemn Trump’s racist remarks.”

Sen. Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat who is not among those with ties to Farrakhan, took to Twitter to condemn the Nation of Islam leader and to say that he must be rejected, not courted. “This is unacceptable in a progressive coalition or any political coalition. Anti-Semitism has no place in American society. We must reject this, left right and center.”

Besides Meeks, Ellison has also condemned Farrakhan for his divisive and hostile rhetoric. Davis denounced anti-Semitism, but also praised Farrakhan, according to the Daily Caller.

In a statement on the Republican Jewish Coalition’s website calling for them to step down, Brooks wrote: “Anti-Semitism is unacceptable. Farrakhan is the moral equivalent of a leader of the KKK. If it was discovered that members of Congress had met with the leader of the KKK, they would need to resign. In this case, for meeting with, and embracing, Louis Farrakhan, nothing short of resignation is acceptable from these seven Democrats.”

Why Doesn’t Mainstream Media Demand Democrats Denounce Farrakhan?

Leave a comment

H/T The Lid.

The Lame Stream Media is the lapdog of the DemocRat party so they get a pass on Calypso Louie Farraconman  and Jeremiah Wright. 

Sometimes media bias has nothing to do with what reporters say, but what they don’t say.

Recently, we’ve learned additional members of the Democratic Party have a relationship with the racist and anti-Semitic Louis Farrakhan, whose hatred has been a well-known fact for well over a decade. But when Farrakhan released new hatred this past weekend the MSM did not question his relationship with the party.

Listen, Jewish people don’t have no hands that are free of the blood of us. They owned slave ships, they bought and sold us. They raped and robbed us. Louis Farrakahn  Saviours Day February 2005

I’m not sure what the bigot was talking about, during the time period Farrakhan said we were raping black people, my Jewish ancestors were in eastern Europe getting beaten up and raped by Cossacks other local Jew-haters.

“These false Jews promote the filth of Hollywood that is seeding the American people and the people of the world and bringing you down in moral strength. … It’s the wicked Jews, the false Jews, that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality. It’s the wicked Jews, false Jews, that make it a crime for you to preach the word of God, then they call you homophobic!”— Louis Farrakhan, Saviours’ Day speech, Feb. 26, 2006

There is a weapon that can be put in a room where there are black and white people, and it will kill only the black and spare the white, because it is a genotype weapon that is designed for your genes, for your race, for your kind,” Louis Farrakhan on Ebola, 2014

Farrakhan and Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) in 2005

This past Sunday Farrakhan crawled out from under the rock he shares with other slugs and made his annual Saviour’s Day speech. As his tradition, he used the speech as an opportunity to spew hatred against Jews and Caucasians and he didn’t disappoint— with comments such as:

“The government is my enemy, the powerful Jews are my enemy, and scared-to-death Negroes are my enemy, and weak Muslims and hypocrites are my enemy!”

(…)“White folks are going down. And Satan is going down. And Farrakhan, by God’s grace, has pulled the cover off of that Satanic Jew and I’m here to say your time is up, your world is through.”

Farrakhan also discussed Keith Ellison (D-MN), the deputy chairman of the Democratic Party, confirming his work with the anti-Semite, something that was known but downplayed by the Congressman.

“He wanted to help his community. He wanted to be a congressman, so when the Jews found out that he was in the Nation [they demanded he denounces Farrakhan]..,Keith [Ellison] was in the Nation in 1995. He was selling the Final Call newspaper, a beautiful brother,”

Interestingly when Ellison’s work with Farrakhan and other anti-Semites was exposed when he was running for chairman of the Democratic party, the exposers were warned by the Anti-Defamation League not to denounce him.

Farrakhan’s hatred isn’t the only issue.  Whenever a bigoted nutjob announces they support President Trump, Democrats, and the mainstream media start screaming “why won’t the president denounce…..?” David Duke for example, or the white supremacists, Roy Moore, etc. etc.

2005: Farrakhan hugging Rep.Al Green (D-TX)

When Democrats show a much closer relationship with haters, heard from the Dems and/or the MSM is the sound of crickets. Former president Obama associated with Al Sharpton who led two anti-Semitic pogroms in NYC, and every other anti-Semite who crawled out from under a rock and there was silence.

Over the past month, we’ve learned senior Congressional Democrats including Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Keith Ellison (D-MN and the deputy chair of the party) and 19 other members of the Congressional Black Caucus with Louis Farrakhan, with the exception of Jake Tapper at CNN, the MSM may have reported the meetings, however unlike when a nutjob supports Trump there is no call for a denunciation. Farrakhan spewed hatred on Sunday, but there is no call for the Democrats to rebuke him.

CNN’s Jake Tapper went on a twitter storm denouncing Farrakhan’s hatred.

On Sunday, Rev. Farrakhan gave his Saviours’ Day 2018 Address, attended by thousands including one of the co-founders of the Women’s March.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMPSt_IQac 

On Sunday, Rev. Farrakhan gave his Saviours’ Day 2018 Address, attended by thousands including one of the co-founders of the Women’s March.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMPSt_IQac 

Shortly after 1:10:50 in the video Farrakhan proclaims that “the powerful Jews are my enemy.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMPSt_IQac 

At 2:57:00 he begins approvingly quoting some of the anti-Semitic comments made by Rev. Billy Graham and President Richard Nixon in the Oval Office.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMPSt_IQac 

At 2:59:00 Farrakhan approvingly cites Nixon and Graham attacking Jews’ “grip on the media” and Hollywood and “how the Jews were responsible for all of this filth and degenerate behavior that Hollywood is putting out turning men into women and women into men.”

Assailing Keith Ellison, at 3:21 Farrakhan says, “let me tell you something, when you want something in this world, the Jew holds the door.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMPSt_IQac 

at 3;49: “White folks are going down. And Satan is going down. And Farrakhan …has pulled the cover off the eyes of that Satanic Jew and I’m here to say your time is up, your world is through.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMPSt_IQac 

The best part of the twitter storm is when Tapper pointed out the danger of Farrakhan is his acceptance by elected officials.

This is who Farrakhan is. It’s why folks are legitimately so offended when they found out that then-Sen. Obama and members of the CBC met with him in 2005. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/photo-of-obama-louis-farrakhan-to-be-released 

The difference between Farrakhan and some members of the alt-reich whose heinous bigotry has received a lot of attention this past year: Farrakhan has a much larger following and elected officials meet with him openly.
-fin-

Farrakhan’s hateful words Sunday were reported by the media but his relationship with Democrats was not treated the same way as when a bigot announces support of President Trump. Where are the headlines saying “denounce Farrakhan!”, or “where are the Democrats?”, or “why is Ellison silent” or even “Do all the Democrats in Congress support the anti-Semitic Farrakhan?” 

I do not believe all Democrats are anti-Semites, but sadly many in the party are leaning that way. Perhaps that’s why the party is silent (well that and the fact that Keith Ellison is their vice-chair)

As for the MSM, they usually ignore Antisemitism (see Al Sharpton and Barack Obama) but  Farrakhan spews hatred against all white people why is the media silent?  Is it because they only care about some bigotry? Is it because Farrakahn has a relationship with Democrats, and the bigots who support the president are supporting a Republican? Perhaps it’s because the media hates Trump more than the average Republican?

2005 Farrakhan Hugging Then-Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA)

When Todd Aiken blew his Missouri Senate bid with the extremely stupid comment, “If it’s legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down,” the first question out of most MSM reporters mouths when confronting a Republican was, “do you agree with Todd Aiken?” Yet four days after Louis Farrakhan unleashed his latest hatred upon the world, not one Democrat has been asked if they agree with him.

Sometimes media bias has nothing to do with what reporters say, but what they don’t say.

Below is a video Farrakhan’s entire 2/25/18 Saviour’s Day speech.

Louis Farrakhan: Hillary is a “Wicked Woman”

1 Comment

This is from Freedom OutPost. 

This is the only thing I can agree with Calypso Louie Farrakhan.

It is ironic that a follower of the Pedohile Mohammed and the Satan inspired god Allah calling someone a wicked.

One has to almost laugh at the fact that someone of the wicked caliber of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan would refer to anyone else as “wicked.”

Yet, this is exactly what the man did just recently in comments which he made concerning Hillary Rodham Clinton. He called her a “wicked woman” who is deceiving the Black community.

On Sunday, Farrakhan warned listeners not to fall for Hillary Clinton’s “crap,” and reiterated a theme that was pushed last week in South Carolina by a Black activist at a Clinton event in which Clinton was called on to address her claims that Black Americans are “super predators” and that he husband was responsible for mass incarceration of Black people under his three strike policy.

“How many of you are going to vote for Hillary Clinton?” asked Farrakhan. “You don’t have to raise your hands. I do not blame you for wanting a female president, but that is a wicked woman.

“She can be sweet, but so can you,” he added. “And you know when you are sweet but playing a game.  All of a sudden she knows about Trayvon Martin. All of a sudden—the boy’s been dead two years now—she talking about him like she met the mother and oh…”

Then he dropped a name worse than Hitler on Clinton.

“White people this is Satan,” he continued. “And you fall for that crap?”

“Most of you went to jail for having a little blunt,” the Nation of Islam leaders said. “They arranged that—the Clintons. Mass incarceration came about under the Clintons. Don’t forget that. They call my young gang bangers super predators. And Black Lives Matter put it to her—she didn’t know how to handle that. Call you a super predator that has no conscience, no sense of dignity like you are a dog, an animal. She gotta bring you to heel you my young brothers. This is what she said about you and she didn’t just say it—it became law and policy of the U.S. government under Bill Clinton and his wife, and now she is apologizing, but apologizing can’t bring back the broken families. Apologizing can’t bring back those that been destroyed in prison life.”

Indeed, there are many blacks who suffer because of various things that go on in their communities. From broken homes to drugs and crime, there are many young Black men who begin their lives at a disadvantage. That is not to excuse their behavior because there are also many Black men in America who have risen above that! Take my good friend Taleeb Starkes, for instance, who now seeks to glorify God in his home with his wife and children! It can be done if people stop making excuses and take responsibility themselves.

This then gets to the heart of even what Farrakhan is saying and that is if Blacks would stop being dependent upon government socialists like Hillary Clinton, who do nothing but keep them enslaved to the system, they might actually discover that they can make something great of their lives, provided they don’t follow people like Louis Farrakhan into a life of hatred.

While I care nothing for Farrakhan and his message and even less for the message of Hillary Clinton, I do agree with Farrakhan that she is most definitely a wicked woman. However, is her wickedness anymore wicked than Farrakhan’s wicked cries for 10,000 Blacks to go murder Whites? I think not. They both are bound for the same Hell apart from a work of God in their hearts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sheriff Clarke furious at deputy’s murder; who really started the ‘war on police?’

Leave a comment

This is from BizPac Review.

I can answer  Sheriff  Clarke’s question the people who are responsible for the war on the police are as follows.

Barack Obama,Jessie Jackson,Al Sharpton,Eric Holder and Louis Farrakhan.

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. laid it out for Judge Jeanine Pirro in an interview Saturday, and he wasn’t holding back.

Saying he was “too pissed off to be diplomatic” about Friday’s ambush and murder of a uniformed deputy sheriff in Houston, Clarke blamed the White House for the “war on police.”

On Saturday, authorities announced the arrest of Shannon J. Miles, 30, a man with a criminal record, in the shooting death of Harris County Deputy Darren Goforth. Charged with capital murder, Miles could face the death penalty.

“I said last December that war had been declared against the American police officer, led by some high-profile people,” Clarke told Fox News host Jeanine Pirro on “Justice With Judge Jeanine” Saturday.

“One of them coming out of the White House, another one coming out of the United States Department of Justice. And it’s open season right now, there’s no doubt about it.”

Clarke referred to members of the Black Lives Matter movement who chant “No justice, no peace” as “black slime that needs to be eradicated from the American society.”

Pirro observed that “without leadership … people seem to be emboldened by this kind of thing.”

“Right,” Clarke said. “And that’s why I said the president of the United States started this war on police.”

Watch the interview, via Fox News.

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/08/30/sheriff-clarke-furious-at-deputys-murder-who-really-started-the-war-on-police-245114#ixzz3kMXP1bSE

 

embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTpLS9Us4yI[/embed]

Slavery Reparation Demands are Pure Entitlement Nonsense

Leave a comment

This is from Patriot UpDate.

Blacks have gotten reparations since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society.

It is called welfare and food stamps.

 

“So you think that people who never owned slaves should be required to pay reparations to people who never were slaves.” This was a comment made by an individual in a class I taught recently in which the issue of slavery reparations was raised. Interestingly, the individual who made this comment is black and the one who proposed reparations is white. Reparations are an ill-conceived concept advocated by people who think they are owed because blacks were once enslaved in America. Those pushing for reparations are predictable: Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton are two of the most vocal advocates. In fact, Farrakhan has gone beyond the borders of the United States with his reparations road show.

Failing to gain any traction in America for slavery reparations, Louis Farrakhan took his entitlement message to the Caribbean last year. In Jamaica he demanded that the Pope endorse slavery reparations to atone for the supposed sins of the Catholic Church. “Project 2019” is a white paper that sets out the case for slavery reparations to be paid by taxing U.S. citizens (although its author admits that seeking reparations is probably a waste of time and effort that could be put to better use in other causes for black Americans).

Reparation demands will probably be with us for a while because they grow out of the entitlement mentality that has become deeply engrained in so many Americans. But demands for slavery reparations are just that: pure entitlement nonsense. In fact, they are an example of race hustling at its worse. Americans of good will are working hard to bridge the racial gap that still exists in our country and bring about a state of racial harmony; something that would benefit Americans of all races. Unfortunately, there are still a few people who view racial discord as an opportunity to be exploited—think of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton—people best viewed as race hustlers. Race hustlers continue to fan the flames of racial discord as a means to keep themselves relevant, maintain power, and fatten their wallets. The biggest fear of race hustlers is that people in America will do what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. recommended: judge people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. If this ever happens the days of race hustling are over.

Fearing exactly this, race hustlers have long sought a way to really pour fire on the embers of racial discord. The more progress people of good faith make in bridging the racial divide in America, the more frantic race hustlers have become in seeking a burning issue that will ensure them of more years, if not decades, of relevance and financial security. The more entrepreneurial of the race hustlers think they have hit upon just the issue: slavery reparations. As race hustles go, this one must look inviting to people who benefit from racial discord because it appeals to them on so many different levels. There are the feelings harbored by some black Americans who know their history and understandably resent aspects of it, there is the growing entitlement mentality in American society, there is white guilt, and, finally, there is the always enticing element of money.

My view is that those who captured, transported, traded, and owned slaves should have been made to pay reparations to those they enslaved 150 years or so ago when slaves and masters were still alive. Reparations assessed at that time would not have erased the blight on humanity that slavery represented, but they would have at least been an attempt at justice. Speaking of justice, this is why I disagree advocates of slavery reparations who want American citizens alive today to be taxed to pay reparations to black Americans. If the goal of reparations is justice, where is the justice in asking Americans who are living today to pay for the sins of Americans who died long ago, sins they played no part in and owing to the span of time involved could not have stopped? How can a person alive today possibly be culpable for sins committed 200 or more years ago?

Further, what about Hispanic and Asian Americans? Should they be required to pay? What about Americans of mixed racial heritage? Should they be required to pay? What about the fact that a high percentage of Americans living today trace their lineage to immigrants who came to America after the Civil War? Should they be allowed to pay? What about descendants of black people who themselves owned slaves? Should they be required to pay? What about descendants of white Americans who helped slaves escape bondage? Should they be required to pay?

To race hustlers, slavery reparations must look like a promising issue on which to hang their hats, not to mention their wallets. Their thinking probably goes something like this: If we make enough noise about this issue and stir up enough guilt, maybe pandering politicians will go along with reparations just to shut us up. But on more careful consideration, the idea of reparations is not just fraught with difficulties; it is the result of twisted logic, entitlement, and greed. Society cannot right one wrong by perpetrating another. You do not establish justice for one man by inflicting injustice on another.

Look into this issue and you will notice right away that slavery reparations advocates do not limit their expectations of payment to just the direct descendants of slave traders and slave owners. This is not because they acknowledge that even direct descendants played no role in the heinous activities of their forbearers. The descendants of slave owners and slave traders weren’t even alive in those dark days of America’s history, nor would they be for a long time. Obviously, people cannot be held responsible—legally, ethically, or morally—for things they did not do and could not prevent. But this is not why reparations advocates choose not to focus on the descendants of slave traders and slave owners. The real reason is the very essence of expedience: money. There are not enough direct descendants of slave traders and slave owners alive in America today to generate the kind of money advocates are hoping to receive. Better for the pocketbooks of race hustlers if all Americans have to pay into the proposed fund and let justice be damned.

Another important question is this: Who would administer a reparations fund? Actually, reparations advocates have already answered this question. The plan is to ask “black leaders” to administer the reparations fund and make decisions concerning how to distribute any money that would be collected. Now there’s a plan. Besides this approach being a formula certain to encourage cronyism, graft, and corruption—that much power coupled with that much money is certain to corrupt, just look at Congress—who is going to choose the black leaders to administer the fund and who is going to oversee their decisions?

Slavery was an abomination, not just to America but to humanity. I state this as a given. However, expecting reparations to be paid by people who did not live during the slavery era, have never owned slaves, and in all likelihood are not even distantly related to slave owners of the past is a bad idea; an idea that is not fair, just, or logical. In fact, the demand for slavery reparations is little more than an example of the entitlement mentality run amok and being pushed by people who are interested in receiving money they don’t deserve from people who don’t owe it to them.
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/slavery-reparation-demands-are-pure-entitlement-nonsense/

Louis Farrakhan Organization Received $103K in Farm Subsidies!

Leave a comment

This is from The Black Sphere.

This is why we do not need farm subsidies.

Why do we need them the Great Depression is over?

 

By now Americans should be well aware of the President’s fondness for people and groups aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Indeed, Obama’s appreciation of all things Islam does not stop there. Thanks to Adam Andrzejewski‘s watch dog organization, Open the Books, we discover that Louis Farrakhan, rabid Nation of Islam leader, has a little pet project, Muhammad Farms, which received $103,529 in aid between 2008 and 2011.

Hmmm. Farm subsidies in urban Chicago. That’s novel.

To be fair, the group did receive $26,357 under the Bush administration.

Andrzejewski writes in the Muhammad Farms report:

Within the geographic borders of the City of Chicago, 930 entities received an aggregated total of $6.129 million in federal government farm subsidy payments.

Federal farm subsidy program dollars are flowing into the “urban areas”- where there are no farms. The recipients include grain traders and members of the Chicago Board of Trade, wealthy second generation inheritors, and non-profit organizations such as the Mallard Habitat Foundation and a charity of The Nation of Islam. Many entities receive the federal subsidies at their downtown loop office buildings or residential mansions.

Nearly every neighborhood in the city receives federal farm subsidy payments- including the Gold Coast, Downtown-Loop, Lincoln Park, and even the President’s neighbors in Hyde Park.

And further down in the report:

In Chicago, the 12th highest farm subsidy recipient is Three Years Economic Savings, Inc- a charity addressed at the home of Minister Louis Farrakhan, leader of The Nation of Islam. The entity also received a “commodity loan” for an additional $26,357 under the George W. Bush administration.

Full disclosure: my relatives are hard-working grass seed farmers who have made a good living raising Bent and Fescue over the years. I have wonderful memories of summers driving John Deere hillside combines and swathers and laying land with the Graham plow behind the Massey Ferguson. So I have a rock-solid appreciation of farmers and farming.

But the numbers revealed in Adam Andrzejewski’s report point toward “Massive amounts of ‘farm subsidies’ flowing into America’s urban areas.” The waste of the federal government is incomprehensible, and the flow of taxpayer monies to hate-infused groups such as The Nation of Islam is despicable.

As Andrzejewski summarizes:

…farm subsidies today have nothing to do with “preserving the family farm.” Wealthy investors have piggy-backed on a growing government program and made the largess of farm subsidies part of their investment portfolio. Many of these wealthy investors don’t live in “rural areas,” but instead utilize “farm managers” and taxpayer dollars to maximize return on their “farm” investments.

In fact, small family farms are not receiving much money. Our analysis shows that billions of the FY2008-11 subsidies flowed to just 1.4% of recipients – those receiving at least $250,000!

All of this under the watch of our Commander in Chief, the Chicago-formed man who was raised on Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and mentored by full-fledged communist, Frank Marshall Davis.

Obama promised to fundamentally change America, to spread the wealth around.

Let’s face it, we have (at least) a socialist presiding at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and spreading the wealth around to the likes of Louis Farrakhan. America’s president is an agent of change, cozying up to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Time for change America.

Time to be vigilant and decry the maneuvers of a radical in the White House. Time to relight the torches of freedom within our Shining City on a Hill and restore the Constitution to it’s preeminent position.
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/12/louis-farrakhan-organization-received-103k-farm-subsidies/#JzgSeFBLtHYE9fDu.99

 

Farrakhan Rails Against “Satanic Jews” And “Synagogue of Satan” During Speech Attended By Dem Rep. John Conyers, NAACP Official…

Leave a comment

This is from Weasel Zippers.

If John Conyers was a Republican the press would be

raising a big stink.

The media would be screaming he was a racist and anti Semite.

There would be a problem if instead of a member of the.

National Association Of Liberal Colored People.

It was a Tea Party Member or Sarah Palin the media

would screaming.

But it was a DemocRat and the N.A.A.L.C.P. so there is only silence.

Calypso Louie Farrakhan can rail against the Jews.

John Conyers can nod in agreement and everything is fine .

According to the Detroit Free Press, Conyers was seen “nodding in agreement” during Farrakhan’s remarks.

Via The Blaze:

The Anti-Defamation League is criticizing Louis Farrakhan for delivering blatantly anti-Semitic statements, using terms such as “Satanic Jews” and the “Synagogue of Satan,” during a speech at a Detroit church last week. The Jewish group is also asking why public figures who attended the Nation of Islam leader’s event have remained silent.

According to the ADL and the Detroit Free Press, those present at the May 17th Fellowship Chapel event included the church’s leader, Rev. Wendell Anthony, who also serves as President of the Detroit branch of the NAACP, Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan) and Detroit City Councilwoman JoAnn Watson. According to the Detroit Free Press, “Conyers and Watson nodded in agreement during some of Farrakhan’s remarks”; however, the paper did not specify during which parts of the speech they nodded.

Keep reading…

Chicago: 446 school age children shot so far this year with strongest gun laws in country – media silent

Leave a comment

This is from Clash Daily.

The land of Barack Milhous Capone Kardashian has had 446 children shot so far.

It seems Mayor Richard Daley and Rahm Emanuel have failed to stop gun crime.  

I think it is time to restore Second Amendment Rights to the people of Illinois.

The cesspool known as Chicago probably has the toughest gun laws in the country, yet despite all the shootings, murders, and bloodshed, you never hear a peep about this from the corrupt state run media. In Chicago, there have been 446 school age children shot in leftist utopia run by Rahm Emanuel and that produced Obama, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, etc. 62 school aged children have actually been killed by crazed nuts in Chicago so far this year with almost two weeks to go. So why isn’t this news worthy? Is it because it would embarrass those anti second amendment nuts who brag about Chicago’s tough gun laws? Is it because most of the kids who were shot and killed were minorities? Or is it because the corrupt media doesn’t want to show Chicago in a bad light?

THE LIST OF MURDERED SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN 2012
18 YEARS OLD- 15

17 YEARS OLD- 16

16 YEARS OLD- 16

15 YEARS OLD- 6

14 YEARS OLD- 4

13 YEARS OLD- 2

12 YEARS OLD- 1

7 YEARS OLD- 1

6 YEARS OLD- 1

446 School Age Children Shot in Chicago so Far This Year
THE LIST OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN SHOT IN 2012

18 year old- 110

17 year old- 99

16 year old- 89

15 year old- 62

14 year old- 39

13 year old- 21

12 year old- 10

11 year old- 2

10 year old- 3

9 year old- 1

7 year old- 3

6 year old- 2

5 year old- 1

4 year old- 1

3 year old- 1

1 year old- 2

Read more at fireandreamitchell.com

Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2012/12/chicago-446-school-age-children-shot-so-far-this-year-with-strongest-gun-laws-in-country-media-silent/#ixzz2FeGj2oca

Farrakhan chides Obama, rips GOP and Romney in Charlotte

Leave a comment

This is from McClatchy D.C.

Calypso Louie Farrakhan fanning the flames of racial hatred.

Why doesn’t Obama denounce Farrakhan’s venom filled speeches?

The answer is real simple he shares Farrakhan’s views.

Obama is filled with the same hatred that fills Farrakhan.

Obama learned well from one of his mentors Jeremiah Wright.

 

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Speaking in Charlotte on Sunday, Louis Farrakhan had this advice for President Barack Obama:

Fight.

“Mr. President, you’ve got to realize you’re fighting for your presidential life,” the leader of the Nation of Islam told an estimated gathering of 6,000 at Bojangles’ Coliseum. “You’re fighting for your vision of the Democratic Party and the country.”

In marking the 17th anniversary of his 1995 Million Man March on Washington, D.C., Farrakhan was scheduled to talk about the economy and a Muslim “blueprint for ending need and want.”

But with the Nov. 6 election three weeks away, the 79-year-old Muslim leader changed his mind, instead offering advice to the president and country, describing a United States still ruptured by race.

Then Farrakhan spent two hours hammering at racial – some critics will call them racist – themes.

To begin, the highly controversial Farrakhan accused Republicans of having “overt” racist motives in their opposition to Obama, the country’s first black president. He attacked a political process that he says is controlled by monied interests and wants “to keep America white.”

And while he claimed Obama’s Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, had lied about his real positions on most major issues throughout the first presidential debate, he also criticized Obama’s low-energy response.

He asked his listeners if they were disappointed in Obama’s performance, and hundreds of hands rose throughout the coliseum.

“Feels like your champion didn’t show up for the fight,” Farrakhan said. “If you lose the first round or two, you go to your corner. It’s called ‘adjustment time.’ Every good fighter knows how to make an adjustment. You don’t get lost.”

He said he thinks Obama and his advisers worried about the president appearing like “an angry black man.” The reasoning: “You can’t go out there and beat up on a white man. You’re going to lose the white vote.”

He then turned his comments back to the president.

“You aren’t going to win any more white votes by being kind and gracious,” he said. “Be a little black.”

Farrakhan’s injection of race into the presidential campaign comes as both parties trade accusations, direct and implied, of racist intent. Obama received 95 percent of the black vote in 2008, and more than 2 million blacks voted for the first time.

Some Democrats say Republican-led voter ID campaigns in several key states are aimed at holding down the black vote. Some conservatives say support for Obama by many African-American voters starts and ends with color. They say they oppose the president on philosophical, not racial, grounds.

Ron Christie, a black conservative who worked for President George W. Bush, told the Huffington Post that black people support Obama out of “a straitjacket solidarity.”

Farrakhan did nothing to dissuade that support, accusing the Republicans of using a strategy to defeat Obama “so overtly hateful and racist in nature that it has polarized America on the basis of race.”

The Nation of Islam minister has made a career out of such harsh rhetoric. He has been accused of fueling racial dissent, anti-Semitism and homophobia. He denied the accusations Sunday, saying he speaks truth as he sees it.

While saying that he “loves my homosexual brothers and sisters,” he said they are disobeying prohibitions set out in the Bible and the Quran. “Now you want to change God’s ways so God doesn’t know what he’s doing.”

He also addressed an audience largely absent from the event: white America.

“What have I done that you could hate me so?” he said.

He then answered his own question with harsh words that had the arena on its feet: “You can’t buy me, and you can’t make me into your n—–.”

Farrakhan’s audience was largely local but drew African-Americans from across the country – old and young, Muslim and Christian, dark suits and elegant dresses, sweatshirts and jeans. Ticket prices ranged from $20 to $100. Security was tight, and male reporters were vigorously frisked.

He was backed on stage by family members, out-of-town African-American Muslim leaders and several of Charlotte’s prominent black religious and political figures, including NAACP President Kojo Nantambu, the Rev. Dwayne Walker, pastor of Little Rock AME Zion Church, and Mecklenburg County Commissioner Vilma Leake.

During his weekend visit, he spoke to students at Johnson C. Smith University and taught a leadership seminar at Walker’s church. He said he had been treated well by the city, and “Charlotte could be our second home.”

Farrakhan, wearing a tan suit, showed no signs of his age (he turns 80 next May). His voice ranged from a rasp to a roar. He frequently pounded his podium, and while his topics veered from politics to race to international affairs, his words at times brought thunderous responses.

He said the U.S. “war on terrorism” had morphed into a “war on Islam” that had left the Middle East more unstable than ever. He also criticized Muslims who subjugate women. “Educate your women,” he said. “Allah is not pleased.”

He spoke of rising tide of diversity that America must embrace or “you will die. But you won’t take us down with you.”

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/10/15/171494/farrakhan-chides-obama-rips-gop.html#storylink=cpy

 

 

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: