Obama Says “ISIL” to Insult Israel 

Leave a comment

Barack Hussein Obama like all of his Muslim brothers hates Israel and want Israel wiped off the face of the earth.

But Israel is the apple of God’s eye and will be around when Obama,The Pedophile Mohammed and the rest of the Muslims are barking in Hell.

Genesis 12:3 King James Version (KJV)

And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.


RUSH:  ISIS versus ISIL. The Levant, includes Israel, includes much of the eastern Mediterranean shoreline. By using the term “ISIL,” it is meant to delegitimize Israel. It is meant to include Israel in the Levant, which would make it Palestine. I’m telling you, there’s a reason Obama does this, and his audience is not us.

Source: Obama Says “ISIL” to Insult Israel – The Rush Limbaugh Show


“I was born into a Muslim family ….” 



Islam is a seventh century murdering and raping cult founded by The Pedophile Mohammed.

Source: “I was born into a Muslim family ….” | Pamela Geller

Migrant Teen Caught Sending ‘Anonymous Hate Letters’ To Herself

Leave a comment

This is from Breitbart London.

Muslims,the LGBT thugs along with the Black Lives Matter thugs are learning well the tactics of Saul Alinsky.

Anonymous hate letters sent to a Senegalese migrant teen living in Italy turns out to have been sent by…herself.

A tale of envy, racism and mystery had the Italian media hooked last May when a series of hate-filled letters sent to the daughter of Senegalese migrants brought about a nationwide conversation about racism and roused high-profile figures such as national politicians to pledge solidarity with the girl. The case received so much attention that it prompted one of the country’s Cabinet ministers to visit her school.

A year on from that whirlwind of publicity, the investigation has concluded quietly with the revelation that the girl made the whole thing up.

La Repubblica, an Italian newspaper, reported that the fourteen year old girl’s father alerted the police after the “model student” received six letters filled with racist slurs. The letters told her that she would never realise her dream of becoming a lawyer because she is black, one going on to say: “You are beautiful but unfortunately you were born dirty. You have to go back to your country with your family unlike me, who is purebred.”

The girl’s father said he believed the hate campaign, which also saw torn exercise books and textbooks sent to his daughter, was motivated half by racism and half by envy because she had recently excelled in her exams.

For over a week news outlets pored over the racist letters, some even analysing the grammatical structure to speculate what sort of person could have sent the hateful missives. It was reported that the girl’s school held investigatory interviews with her classmates, compared the letters’ handwriting with that of all the other pupils, and the headteacher promised “exemplary punishment” as excuses “would not be enough”.

A few days after the initial report, la Repubblica published an open letter by the young Muslim, who wears a hijab. In it, the fourteen year old conveys enthusiasm for her studies and pledges to work even harder in order to one day achieve her goal of becoming a lawyer.

Speaking out against prejudice, the girl writes that whilst Italians denounce racism, racist behaviour can “eventually jump out of people”. She expresses hope that the culprits of the hate campaign will be identified so she can “look them in the eye” and they can be punished.

There was further intrigue a few days later when the press reported that a new letter had been found, this one mocking the girl for going to the press and declaring that neither she nor the police would ever learn the sender’s identity.

It repeated claims that the Senegalese teenager would never be able to become a lawyer, this time saying “no one is willing to be defended by a black woman”. This seventh letter in the series stated that newspapers covering the episode do not don’t care about the girl’s plight and taunted that “they just want the pennies”.

The mayor of Pisa soon weighed in on the controversy, calling it “unbearable”, andannouncing that the whole city is “mobilising for the student”.

Other high profile figures added their voices of support, too, with trade union leader Gianfranco Francese condemning the letters as the “poisoned fruit of racist and xenophobic propaganda”.

But one year on from all of this the furore, the centre-right newspaper Secolo d’Italia has revealed the investigation, conducted by the juvenile justice prosecutor, closed with no one held responsible for the letters.

The girl’s’ classmates’ mobile phone records and social media profiles were examined, and the police even conducted a raid on the school, but what eventually emerged from the investigation is that no third parties were responsible. Experiencing relationship difficulties, the Senegalese girl had apparently orchestrated the hoax for attention, and is now being seen by social services in the municipality to help her “overcome” these issues.

Citadel mulls changing uniform policy to allow Muslim cadet to wear hijab

Leave a comment

This is from Jihad Watch.

If The Citadel allows Muslims to alter their dress code will they add other religions?

Will Jewish cadets be allowed to wear their Yarmulkes    or Kippahs?    


“If the request is granted, it would seem to be the first time the public military college in Charleston, South Carolina, has broken its tradition of mandating cadets wear uniforms at practically all times. The 174-year-old school hasn’t ever allowed a uniform deviation ‘to our knowledge,’ spokeswoman Kim Keelor told NBC News.”

Of course the first change would be in order to accommodate a Muslim student. The principle is always and everywhere the same: wherever Muslim customs and practices differ from non-Muslim customs and practices, non-Muslim customs and practices must give way. This never fails. Non-Muslims in the West increasingly take for granted that they must do this.


The Citadel is considering a request from an admitted student who is Muslim to wear a hijab — a notable exception to its uniform requirements.

If the request is granted, it would seem to be the first time the public military college in Charleston, South Carolina, has broken its tradition of mandating cadets wear uniforms at practically all times.

The 174-year-old school hasn’t ever allowed a uniform deviation “to our knowledge,” spokeswoman Kim Keelor told NBC News. “It’s an old school, though.”

Keelor would not say what factors are being weighed, and she would not provide any information on the student. A decision is expected in the next few weeks, she added.

The school doesn’t currently have any students who have a special religious accommodation for uniforms, according to Col. Brett Ashworth, vice president of communications and marketing.

In its religious accommodation policy, the Citadel says it “places a high value on the rights of cadets to observe tenets of their respective religious faiths.”

“The Citadel will approve requests for accommodation of religious practices unless accommodation will have an adverse impact on a competing institutional interest including, but not limited to, cohesion, morale, good order and discipline, cadet welfare, safety and/or health,” the policy states.

The Citadel’s stringent policies call for uniforms to be worn at all times, with two exceptions: Upper-class cadets can wear civilian clothes during the academic year when they’re departing on or returning from furlough, and all cadets can change out of their uniforms when they’re swimming at area beaches.

But even that is tightly regulated: “Cadets will change into appropriate swimwear upon arrival and change back into uniform when departing,” according to the rules….


Garland, Texas imam calls for restrictions on the freedom of speech

1 Comment

This is from Jihad Watch.

If Muslims have a problem with free speech, then they need to go back to the third world shit hole you came from.


That is always the endgame for Islamic supremacists: to destroy the freedom of speech so that Islam cannot be criticized and the jihad cannot be opposed, so that it can advance unimpeded. People have no idea what is at stake in this controversy.

“Group that hosted Prophet Muhammad Cartoon Contest has Houston supporters,” by Joel Eisenbaum,, May 13, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

But other Houstonians, including a Houston area Muslim imam, who condemned the Garland attack, but supports restrictions on free speech, believes incendiary language should be restricted by law.

“I think there needs to be a change to the law where people do not disrespect especially high people,” Imam Mobasher Ahmed said.

UK cops arrest 14-year-old Muslim in connection with Australia Islamic State jihad plot

1 Comment

This is from Jihad Watch. 

The U.K. has bowed down so long to the Muslims and allowed them to take over now they are paying the price.


I read the news today, oh boy, 14-year-old jihadi in Blackburn, Lancashire…

“UK police arrest boy, 14, over Australia IS attack ‘plot,’” AFP, April 20, 2015 (thanks to Lookmann):

Police in Britain, said Monday they have arrested a 14-year-old boy in connection with an alleged Islamic State-inspired attack plan in Australia.

The boy was arrested Saturday “on suspicion of being concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism and remains in police custody for questioning,” Greater Manchester Police in northwest England said in a statement.

Australian police arrested five men in counter-terrorism raids in Melbourne on Saturday and charged one of them with conspiring to commit a terrorist act on Anzac Day on April 25, when ceremonies are held to remember Australian and New Zealand Army Corps troops who fell in the World War I Gallipoli campaign.

One of the officers working on the case in Britain, Detective Chief Superintendent Tony Mole, said: “We have uncovered communication between an individual in the northwest and a man in Australia to what we believe is a credible terrorist threat….

Police said the boy, from Blackburn in Lancashire, northwest England, had previously been arrested on April 2.

Authorities stressed they had not uncovered any evidence of an imminent attack being planned in Britain.

Australian police said the arrest in Britain was connected to their operation.

“Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police can confirm a link between the arrest of a 14-year-old boy in Blackburn, Lancashire in the United Kingdom on Saturday with Operation Rising,” the state and national police forces said in a joint statement….


Egypt: Christian arrested for offending Muslims, witch-hunt for 5 others

Leave a comment

This is from Jihad Watch.

To Christians around the world that are remaining silent it is time to read and heed these words.

“First They Came for the Jews”
By Pastor Niemoller

First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Last week, security agents arrested Gad Yusif Yunan, a 22-year-old Coptic Christian man who works as an English teacher in Nasriya village, Upper Egypt, on the charge of “contempt of religions.”  He is accused of posting a 30-second video on his personal Facebook page that deals with Muslim prayers and is apparently insulting.

Once local Muslims discovered it, they informed security agents who who proceeded to arrest him in the late night.  Security is also looking for five others believed to have been involved in the film.

The young Copt was reportedly held for four days pending investigations in his exact role in this 30-second-film.

Although Egypt’s “contempt of religions” law theoretically applies to all religions—theoretically means if a Muslim insults Christians or Christianity in Egypt, he too should be arrested—it is used almost exclusively to target Egypt’s Christian minorities.

Update: On Friday, April 10 — as usual, after Islam’s weekly communal prayers  – Muslims in Nasriya village rose up in violence against Christian homes, hurling stones through their windows and even setting fire to them.  This was done in “retaliation” to the offense Muslims received from the Coptic teacher who was arrested two days earlier.

HIDDEN CAMERA: Gay Wedding Cake At Muslim Bakery

Leave a comment

This is from Western Journalism.

The reason the homosexuals go to Christian Bakeries is they want to force Christians to accept and support their perversion and compromise their beliefs.

Yet these say homosexuals would never force Muslims to compromise their beliefs and support their perversion.

What do you think happens?


Yes folks, I did this. I went there. You have this now. Actually, I taped this video a long time ago but, due to audio corruption issues, was never able to upload it. Now that my in-house whiz kid, Jared, was able to salvage the footage, I am now passing it on to you.

What do you think happens when a gay, like SUPER gay, Crowder tries to get a super gay wedding cake baked at a Muslim bakery? I’m pretty sure you can guess, but you might as well watch this week’s adventure to Dearborn, Mich., to find out!


FEMALE MAYOR OF IRVING: Tells Islam & Their Sharia Law To Kiss Texas’ Ass (So to speak)


This is from Clash Daily.

If Muslims want Sharia Law then they can put their goat humping asses on their camels and go back to any third world shit hole that has Sharia Law then stay there.

IRVING (CBSDFW.COM) – Dozens of Muslims in Irving are upset after the city council passed a resolution in support of a new state house bill some Muslims believe targets their faith.

Council members voted Thursday night on a resolution that support Texas HB 562, which forbids the use of foreign law and codifies the supremacy of U.S. and state law.

“I think it’s the most disgraceful day in the city of Irving,” said Omar Suleiman, an Irving resident who is Muslim. “The elephant in the room is that it’s the anti-Shariah bill.”

Some Muslims in Irving believe the resolution is in reaction to a new Islamic Tribunal that is operating in the city.

Judges had previously told community members their work is non-binding and they only deal with civil disputes like marriage. They also said U.S. and state laws supersede any decisions they make.

“This bill does not mention at all Muslims, Shariah Law, Islam, even religion,” said Mayor Beth Van Duyne.

Mayor Beth Van Duyne said it is important to recognize the constitution and unite behind U.S. and Texas laws.

“Respect them, obey them, embrace them,” said the mayor.
Many Muslims said all they can do is take use their feelings the next time they vote.


‘Flag Baby’ Gets National Attention For Incredible Reason [VIDEO]


This is from Joe For America.

Larry Scumbag Flynt uses the American Flag as a diaper  nothing but silence.

Bill The Terrorist Ayers stomps on the American Flag nothing.

Muslims burn and defecate on the American Flag again silence.

 Vanessa Hicks a mother and a Navy veteran snaps a picture of her baby girl laying on the American Flag and people go nuts.

I personally do not have a problem with the picture.


An Idaho photographer is finding herself at the center of some unwanted attention after she posted a photo to her Facebook page of a beautiful family moment that happened to feature the American flag.

What? Yep, read on, as East Idaho News reports:

A photographer and Navy veteran is fighting back after a photo she posted to Facebook started an online backlash.

Vanessa Hicks said she had no idea her photo would be considered controversial. The photo, from a military family’s newborn photo shoot, showed a newborn infant wrapped in an American flag held by his father, who was in his military uniform.





First of all, AWWWWWWWW! So cute!!!! Second of all, the problem is what, here exactly?

Hicks, a Navy veteran herself and the wife of an active-duty Navy member, said her intention was to honor the flag as well as her clients, who wanted to incorporate their military service in the photo shoot.

“This is what he was fighting for, his son wrapped in an American flag,” Hicks told ABC News.

However, when she posted the image on her page, she started to get comments accusing her of desecrating the flag.

On one Facebook page, an unidentified poster put up her picture and wrote that they found it was “disrespectful, rude, tacky, disgusting, and against the U.S. Flag Code.”

The Federal Flag Code has guidelines for the proper treatment of the U.S. Flag but there are no rules for punishment related to violations. In the past, the Supreme Court has found that people are protected from punishment under the First Amendment for manipulating or even burning the flag.

Hicks said she was surprised when messages suddenly started to pop up on her Facebook page and even her own website criticizing her photos.

Wow. Talk about none of your business, jerk faces. This was a family moment that people serving this country, and that people serving this country did not find offensive, so perhaps you should reconsider your ‘outrageous’ comments about sacristy of the flag

She said she stayed up until 4 a.m. recently to take down comments from her business and company page, even on shoots that had nothing to do with the flag.

“I know how low I felt during those first few hours,” said Hicks. “[I felt] am I not a good American or veteran or wife? It’s a train-wreck you can’t help but watch.”


As Hicks tried to stop the comments from taking over her pages, others started to take notice and her picture went viral on social media sites. After that, Hicks found that many people, both military and civilian, told her they did not find the picture offensive.

“I have seen first-hand what is desecration of the flag,” Hicks said of her time in the military. “At the end of the day I didn’t do anything that disrespected this flag.”

Girl, please. That is a beautiful picture, and I wish I had thought of it for my sister when her daughter was born. She was active duty Marine Corps, deployed to Iraq, (OO-RAH) and I would have loved to see my niece in such a beautiful photo.

Hicks, whose husband is still on active duty in the Navy, said the flag is a symbol of U.S. freedoms including the First Amendment right to free speech.

“[My husband] wouldn’t die for a flag, he would die for the freedoms that this country offers,” she told ABC News.

After her story grabbed local headlines, Hicks has been inundated by requests for photos shoots, and she said she plans to give 15 percent of all profits related to these shoots to the USO.

I may give you a call. It’s a 10 hour drive, but I stand on principle and support others that do as well. And your photos are proof positive that you stand for America and her values.

Picture of a Baby in a Flag Causing Controversy×9&widgetId=2&trackingGroup=69017


Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: