College Professor Arrested for Profane Rant at Pro-Life Students

1 Comment

This is from LifeNews.

Another pro baby murder type coming unhinged.

They can not handle the dirty rotten facts about abortion.

So they use personal attacks and profanity.

A college professor has been arrested for a profane rant at pro-life students at the University of Buffalo.

Professor Laura Curry screamed at students, yelling at them: “Where does it say I can’t use the f**k word in public. I can swear because that’s part of my vocabulary. That’s part of my First Amendment rights.”

According to a report by Fox News, Curry, an adjunct instructor of media study, was lashing out at the University’s Students for Life organization. The group had erected a pro-life display featuring images that offended Curry.

“I can swear in public because that is profane,” she said referring to the display. “That image is swearing to me. That is profane to me.”

An unidentified individual filmed the incident and posted the video on Creative Minority Report.

“That image is profane but f**k is,” she yelled at police officers responding to the disturbance.

A university spokesman told Fox News confirmed Curry’s arrest but declined to provide information about her current employment status.

“Would you let my class know I’m under arrest,” she asked as officers slapped a pair of handcuffs on the profane professor and carted her off to jail.

Kristan Hawkins, the president of Students For Life of America, said pro-life students are typically singled out for attacks on campus.

“As we’ve seen again and again, a pro-abortion supporter couldn’t handle the ugly truth of abortion and lashed out,” Hawkins told Fox News. “She had to resort to yelling and using profane language with police officers.”


New York Governor Pushes Late Term Abortion “For The Children”

Leave a comment

This is from Political Outcast.

This is from the same  progressive  Communist that want to ban all firearms,

so children will grow up with out being murdered by gunfire.

Governor Cuomo wants to murder them before they are born of just after being born.

One way liberals try to protect the children is by taking guns away from law-abiding citizens, or at least placing restrictions on magazines and gun purchases. Another way they protect children is by giving women the right to murder their unborn child, thus protecting that child from a potential life of hardship in this cruel world filled with gun violence.

Since New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo has been successful at passing more stringent gun laws to protect the kids, he’s now pushing the Reproductive Health Act, which will allow abortion after the 24th week of pregnancy, which is currently the threshold in New York. A woman can have an abortion after that threshold only if it is to save her life. The New York Civil Liberties Union stated:

“Sometimes a pregnancy puts a woman’s health and life at risk. When this happens – often late in a pregnancy – a woman is faced with the difficult decision of whether to have an abortion in order to protect her own health. This difficult, personal decision should be made by a woman and her doctor, not politicians in Washington or Albany. Currently, New York criminalizes abortions after the 24th week of pregnancy, unless a woman’s life is at risk. New York law does not make the same, constitutionally required exception when a woman’s health is at risk.”

Constitutionally required?” Where in the Constitution does it allow murdering someone as long as a doctor says that doing so would save the life of someone else? And how many abortions are done supposedly to protect the life of the mother or her health? I’ve seen ranges anywhere from .004% to 5% of abortions are done reportedly to protect the mother’s life. The vast majority of abortions have nothing to do with health and livelihood even according to the doctors that perform them.

The Association of Pro-Life Physicians (APLP) say that there is never an instance where murdering an unborn child is medically necessary. Even if the mother’s life is in jeopardy, this doesn’t justify murder:

“Let us illustrate this principle further: if a rescuer is venturing into a burning vehicle to try to save its injured occupants, and is only able to save one of the two occupants, is it justifiable for him to then take out his gun and shoot the occupant he was unable to save?  Of course not!  Intentionally killing those you were not able to save is never justified in healthcare.  We have the technology and expertise to provide quality healthcare to a pregnant woman without intentionally killing her unborn baby, regardless of the severity of her disease.”

Most abortions are done simply because it’s the mother’s or someone else’s choice. Maybe she didn’t want to get pregnant. Maybe her baby has a deformity. And their solution is to just kill the child. Would they support killing an infant because he has a deformity? How about if the infant is causing the mother’s health to decline? What’s the difference?

The so-called Reproductive Health Act would allow late-term abortions for whatever reason the mother or doctor can think of. It has nothing to do with health or saving lives. They claim that abortions at any stage can save the life of the mother, but as the APLP say, “A murderer of one person is not any less a murderer if he allows thousands to live, nor if he saves thousands from dying!”

Read more:


491 babies born alive after failed abortions, left to die: Statistics Canada confirms

1 Comment

This is from

This is a practice that Barack Milhous Capone Kardashian supports.

Because of Obamacare babies in america will die this way.

The doctors that condone this are the scum of the earth.


OTTAWA, Nov. 28, 2012 ( – Pro-life advocates are calling for a federal investigation after Canada’s official statistics agency has confirmed that 491 babies died after they were born alive during abortions between 2000 and 2009.

Statistics Canada confirmed the information in an e-mail to LifeSiteNews Tuesday. Pro-life blogger Patricia Maloney first discovered the data about the abortions in the federal agency’s online database.

Mary Ellen Douglas, National Organizer for Campaign Life Coalition, called the revelation “outrageous.”

Nearly 500 babies were born alive after failed abortions and left to die between 2000 and 2009.

“The federal government needs to do whatever it can to investigate this data,” she added. “It’s bad enough that babies are being killed in the womb, but now we learn that even those protected under Canadian law are apparently being left to die.”

Douglas recalled that pro-lifers heard about babies being born after hysterotomy abortions in Kingston in the 1980s. “Babies were found struggling for life in a basin and nurses were told to leave them alone because they were aborted,” she said.

Andre Schutten, legal counsel for the Association for Reformed Political Action, pointed out that Canada recognizes the baby as a human being as soon as it emerges alive from its mother, and questioned why there have been no homicide investigations into the live births.

“Why have there been no criminal prosecutions? Why no outcry? And why are the provinces funding this explicitly criminal activity?” he asked.

Pro-life activists have long known that babies are often born alive after failed abortions, but until now, it was not known how frequently this occurred in Canada.

Jill Stanek, a former nurse in Chicago turned pro-life blogger, has described witnessing babies being born alive after failed abortions, then being brought to a “soiled utility room” and left to die. Her testimony sparked the state’s Born Alive Infant Protection Act.

“My experience was that they [the babies] survive as short as a few minutes, to once, almost as long as an eight hour shift,” she said in 2008.

In one instance, she said she heard that a child was being left, and she “couldn’t bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone.” “And so I cradled and rocked him for the forty-five minutes that he lived.”

In another grisly case, last year abortionist Kermit Gosnell was arrested after allegedly slitting the spinal chords of hundreds of newborn babies who were born alive in the process of an attempted abortion.

The 491 deaths reported to StatsCan are listed in CANSIM table 102-0536, under code P96.4, which is titled “Termination of pregnancy, affecting fetus and newborn.”

In an e-mail, StatsCan’s Owen Phillips explained that this code indicates the cause of the born child’s death was an abortion. He said these are not stillbirths, which have a different table.

“These are included in national cause of death statistics because when the aborted fetus is born alive and subsequently dies, each event must be registered,” he wrote in an e-mail. “If the aborted fetus is born dead but meets the provincial requirement (birth weight and/or gestational age) it must be registered as a stillbirth.”

“Live birth,” according to StatsCan, applies when, after proceeding from his mother’s womb, the child “breathes or shows any other evidence of life, such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, whether or not the umbilical cord has been cut or the placenta is attached.”

An example of the type of case that would be classified among these 491 deaths is offered by the Canadian Institute for Health Information in its Coding Standards.

It describes “a patient presented at 20 weeks gestation, requesting a therapeutic abortion. She was started on misoprostol, intravenously. The fetus was successfully expelled. A heart beat and respirations were detected at birth.”

“The outcome of the intended termination was delivery of a liveborn fetus,” it states.

According to Canada’s Criminal Code, a child is guaranteed legal protection when he “has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother.” asked StatsCan what they did with the data when it was reported and if they had alerted Canada’s Justice Minister, but did not hear back by press time. also raised the issue with federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, but again did not hear back by press time.

Contact Information:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson
(613) 957-4222

Find contact info for all Canada’s Members of Parliament.


Liberals Are Hiders and Hypocrites

Leave a comment


This is from Godfather Politics.

Liberals say they oppose the death penalty .

But they remain silent when it comes to murdering babies.

Liberals say whales trees owls need saving as they are defenseless.

Yet the look at helpless babies as some thing that needs to be destroyed.



I was reading an ongoing discourse between several commenters to an article posted on Last Resistance.  The article in question dealt with a school bus driver who bullied a 12 year old boy because he was a Romney supporter.  When the boy told the bus driver that Obama supported abortion, the bus driver told him that his mother should have aborted him.

One of the commenters was a pro-abortion flaming liberal who aroused the ire of a pro-life commenter.  What the pro-lifer wrote in one of his/her replies caught my attention and I thought I might elaborate on it a bit.  Here is the response (with some editorial corrections) along with my comments:

“Liberals are hiders.  They hide behind things.  In the west we call them Back Shooters and are regarded as low as a snake..  Examples: Liberals will openly oppose Capital Punishment because the Condemned MIGHT be Innocent..  Liberals will oppose Capital punishment because it is CRUEL and UNUSUAL…  BUT…  When Liberals want to KILL 3000+ Babies a day who did nothing to no one, didn’t break any laws, don’t have a right to an attorney, aren’t charged with anything, aren’t found guilty in a trial, were not convicted by anyone except a woman that didn’t keep her legs closed and those who support her right to pronounce judgment upon him or her..  And instead of calling it MURDER they both hide behind the feels good warm and fuzzy name of Abortion..”

I have found this to be so true.  I’ve tried to show them the hypocrisy of their views, but they never fail to see it themselves.  One tried to argue that a criminal is a living human being and a foetus is just a hunk of tissue.  I immediately seized on that and asked when does the hunk of tissue become a living human being?  They told me when they are born.  So I asked them if a child delivered earlier in development than another child, for instance a premature birth, is that child not a living human, and if so, then why isn’t a child who is more developed but still in the womb?  The liberal was so consumed by their pro-abortion rhetorical views that they could not comprehend the point I was making.  They did everything they could to hide behind the notion that until a child is a born, it’s not human, just a hunk of tissue.

“Now for the method of execution. While still alive the baby will be torn apart in pieces until they can no longer move away from the probing tool killing them and die..  OR in late stage ‘Abortion’, they will be dragged down the birth canal feet first until just the head is still in the birth canal, then a sharp instrument will be shoved into the base of the skull and the brains scrambled and or sucked out..  So tell me you idiot, who is backwards?  People who are Pro-Life or you idiots who foam at the mouth demanding the RIGHT to kill 3000+ kids each and every day of the year just to make someone comfortable in THEIR life?”

Ultrasounds have proven that a baby still in the womb experiences pain and joy.  They have been seen to smile and they have been seen to pull away and react to pain or something unpleasant.  I’d like to a see a hunk of tissue smile or react to pain.  Now imagine how you would feel to be ripped apart limb by limb without anything to kill the pain.

I once got into a discussion with a Jewish man who supported abortion and explained to him what the unborn babies go through in the abortion process.  I then asked him what the difference was between these abortion procedures and what the German Nazi’s did to Jews in the concentration camps during World War II.  The man’s eyes welled up and told me that his grandparents and about twenty other relatives had been killed in the concentration camps.  Through the tears, he told me that he had never thought about abortion that way before, but now that I had put it that way to him, he understood what I was saying and admitted that he could never support abortion again.

“You hug trees, save Whales and Puppies, demand the cruelty to animals stop but get your rocks off killing kids, even regard it as another birth control method..”

On more than one occasion I’ve seen pro-abortion bumper stickers on cars alongside stickers to save the whales, seals, and Mother Earth.  I’ve spoken to a number of liberals who support abortion but are against logging, hunting, fishing, even raising animals for food.

I once got into it with a tree-hugging vegan who was against any use of animal products, but who also supported abortion.  They told me that every living thing has the right to life.  I asked them about the carrot they were eating at the time.  Wasn’t the carrot a living thing until someone ripped it from the ground?  They tried to tell me it was different but I kept pressuring them to explain how it was different since they already said that plants were living things and that all living things had the right to life.  Unable to grasp the flawed logic of their own argument, they just kept saying that it was different for plants we use for food, but that same logic did not apply to animals used for food.  Rather than face the truth of what they say and do, they hide behind terms and ideologies that fail their own logical standards.

“Wanting under-age girls [to have] the right to do it [abortion] without Parental notification..”

Abortion advocates like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Planned Parenthood and the United Nations are all pushing to give girls as young as 10-12 years of age access to contraceptives and abortions without parental knowledge or permission.  Parents have to give permission to these kids to take an aspirin to school, but the school, with the help of Planned Parenthood, will provide condoms and abortions without mom and dad knowing.  They are undermining parental authority and the family structure under the name of preventing unwanted pregnancies and children.  In other words, a 13 year old girl can go and have her unborn baby murdered without any consequence, but if she is caught kicking a dog, she and her parents can get into legal trouble.

“You hypocrites…   Proportionately Black Babies are Murdered more than any other race.  Girls are Murdered more than Boys..  Publicly funded Planned Parenthood has been caught on tape helping this to happen..  What is this, your method of gender and race selection?  Who is backwards, those who oppose killing REAL Innocent people or those who Demand the RIGHT to kill Babies..”

Before we know it, our socialist government will use these methods to create a tailored race and gendered society, kind of like Hitler’s master race.

“Any other group who would come here and kill 3000+ of our children PER DAY would find themselves at WAR, we would be so outraged that we would attack them relentlessly.. Yeah it’s a woman’s body, Life is tuff.. Deal with it..  If you don’t want kids get your tubes tied, or don’t fornicate, you are an adult, you know the possible outcome, keep your flippin’ legs closed…  The only way to justify murdering a baby in the womb is if that baby is jeopardizing the mother’s life.   That is self-defense in its simplest form…  In some situations it may be justified in rape and/or incest…  Remember, the resulting baby is guilty of NOTHING, no more than a 1 year old is guilty because his father killed someone while robbing them…  The baby didn’t ask to be part of the situation any more than the mother in a rape or incest situation..  SO WHO ARE  ‘these types of creatures’ that would support killing KIDS ??? That IS what you are doing for whatever fuzzy reasons you hide behind..”

A mother walks into a grade school and starts shooting young kids and the nation is horrified of such an attack on innocent children.  A clinician walks into his abortion clinic and kills several innocent children each and every day, and the liberals say it’s okay because the mother has the right to choose and the clinician is just doing his job.  Please tell me the difference between the two, other than the age of the victims?

Yes, liberals hide behind words, terminology and ideologies that are hypocritical and defy logic.  They trod down the path of conflicting values like a horse wearing blinders, only seeing in one direction.  Once in a while we can get through to a couple of them, but for the most part, they seem completely incapable of understanding their own contradictory values.  And thus we have a population of liberals, mostly Democrats who go about their merry way, completely oblivious to common sense values and morals.  No wonder America is in the condition we are now!

Read more:


%d bloggers like this: