Leave a comment

This is from BarbWire.

The roots of gun control are set deep in racism.

Among the many things that have troubled me about the current debate about gun regulation is how black Leftists seem ignorant of the connection between racism and gun control laws. It is troubling to me to see so many black folk beating the drum for (let’s face it) the confiscation of guns. Gun control was born in the racist and oppressive effort to disarm black people and prevent them from protecting themselves. And frankly, not much has changed.

I blame Hollywood. You see, for decades, Hollywood has churned out films depicting black people cowering under the whip of the white man, afraid to defend himself. Hollywood has made millions on images of black families peeing in their pants, while hiding from night riders, waiting for good (liberal) white people to save them. It’s no wonder the Leftist Hollywood loves gun control: they’re the heroes! The truth, however, is slightly different.

Thumbing through the history of this country, one doesn’t find gun control laws until the late 18th century and those laws were aimed specifically at keeping guns (and anything that could be used as a weapon) out of the hands of black people – both slave and free. There is actually no madness to this method. After all, when one is fearful of slave revolts, the last thing one wants is slaves who are armed with guns. Slaves who were armed were far more likely to defend themselves than were those who had no means of self defense.

Following the Civil War, in order to pass muster with the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, laws were neutrally written, but were specifically aimed at keeping guns out of the hands of the local black citizenry. You see, rather than cower in the corner waiting for white folks to save them, when night riders rode up to cause trouble, black people protected their lives and property, by shooting back. White politicians protected their racist partners by enacting local laws that sought to protect terrorists by disarming their black victims. As more and more black men returned from service in the U.S. Army, blacks began to organize into, militias in order to protect them from the persistent and violent attack on their persons and property. That’s right. A militia isn’t just the National guard.

What is particularly shameful is that today there are blacks who consider themselves warriors for social justice, who are now demanding that the Federal government act, or worse, that the president act without the consent of the congress, in enacting laws that appear neutral, but whose impact will be disproportionately felt by black and poor citizens. Leftist used to call disparate impact racist. Apparently that is only true when the discussion isn’t about the fundamental right to protect one’s life and liberty.

Some may claim that I am reaching back to the mid 20th century in order to make my argument. Wrong. I am reaching back to last week. Black Lives Matter is claiming that police are waging a war on black men.

Why then would socially conscious black folk cheer when the white chief of the Chicago police department talks about removing guns from the Black community?  Why would any socially conscious black Leftists claim that the state of Illinois is giving concealed carry permits to white people and rejecting black applicants and then demand more regulation by the government? Why would black folks who truly care about the health of the black community decry the heavy presence of police in their communities and then demand gun laws that would make criminals out of previously law abiding citizens and INVITE more police scrutiny or their private property?

Perhaps it’s because the new KKK is spelled SJW.



Watch Deneen Borelli Describe Obama as Rapper-In-Chief For Using the N-Word

Leave a comment

This is from Deneen Borelli.

Obama has destroyed the integrity of the office of president.

I think Deneen’s description of Obama as Rapper in Chief is spot on. 

President Obama just hit a now low – even for him.

During a podcast interview on WTF with Marc Maron, Obama used the n-word in a discussion about race.

USA Today reports:

President Obama says the legacy of slavery and racism still hangs over the nation, speaking in an interview in which he drops the “n word.”

“Racism, we are not cured of it,” Obama says in a newly released podcast with the comedian Marc Maron.

“And it’s not just a matter of it not being polite to say n—-r in public,” the nation’s first African-American president adds. “That’s not the measure of whether racism still exists or not. It’s not just a matter of overt discrimination. Societies don’t, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 to 300 years prior.”

Watch the video to see my response to Obama’s comment.


While Sharpton marched in DC, black teen, 15 was shot for his jacket

Leave a comment

This is from BizPac Review.

Al and Jessie remain silent about black on black murders because they can not scream about racism.

Not being to scream about racism is not profitable because there is not any way to shake anyone down.


A march  against the killing of black men by police officers organized by the National Action Alliance on Saturday in Washington, was interrupted by a group of youth activists from Ferguson, Mo., who rushed the stage demanding to be heard and accused Sharpton of turning their cause into a show.

While this made-for-TV moment was being broadcast, Demario Bailey, 15,  was murdered in the Englewood  neighborhood of Chicago. He and his twin brother, Demacio, were walking to Demacio’s basketball practice when four hoods demanded the teenager’s jacket.

“Some guys came upon him and tried to rob him of his jacket,” said Demario’s aunt, Michelle Fitzpatrick. “Our nephew wouldn’t give up his coat, and they shot him in the chest.”

The shooting happened at 12:40 p.m. on West 63rd Street. Seven minutes later, Demario was pronounced dead. Here is footage:

Self-appointed black leaders such as Sharpton, the Rev Jesse Jackson and the rest of the “poverty posse” will not address black on black killings in America, turning a blind eye to fixing the problem.

According to NBC Chicago reports, three were killed while 27 were wounded in violent crimes in the Chicago area this weekend. When will something be done to expose these criminals in the community instead of grandstanding 400 miles away for the CSPAN cameras?

h/t Chicago Tribune

Read more:

Is There a Cure for Stupidity? Jesse Jackson Blames Ebola on Racism?!?


This is from Alfonzo

This is not a cure or a fix for stupid.


Can Jesse Jackson inoculate his stupidity away? He really thinks that Ebola has racist roots, and thinks doctors are treating black people differently.

I guess according to Jesse Jackson, Ebola is a bunch of Microscopic bigots that like to eat black people.

Hear more in this ZoNation!

Man’s Rebuttal to Union Who Threatened Him Over Duck Dynasty Sticker a Superb Lesson in Tolerance

Leave a comment

This is Independent Journal Review.

I just love liberal union thug tolerance.SNARK.

Here is the offensive bumbersticker.


duck dynasty sticker



Who knew that voicing your support of a TV personality could cost you your job? Union bosses demanded the firing of two senior management personnel at Eglin Air Force Base, because they displayed Duck Dynasty bumper stickers on their vehicles and in their offices.

Union officials of the American Federation of Government Employees found the decals so offensive, they demanded that the two men be fired. Alan Cooper, the executive vice president of the local chapter, explained in an interview with Fox News why displaying the stickers warranted a firing.

“The BUE (bargaining union employee) was clearly offended and disgusted that a senior management official would display the decal on their pod,” read an email Cooper wrote.

“We took offense,” Cooper told me in a telephone interview. “These two particular individuals have a great amount of influence over individuals who may be gay, who may be African-American – and we have a concern they should not be in a position to exert that influence when it comes to promotions.”

The two employees are both military veterans, and volunteers in their community. One of them, who asked not to be named, said accusations of racism and homophobia couldn’t be farther from the truth.

via Fox News:

“My intent was not to offend anybody,” the individual told me. “My intent was to support the show and to show support for his Christian values.”


“I’m pro-family,” he said. “I’m pro-life. I don’t have a problem with anybody who doesn’t agree with me.”


“I disagree with 90 percent of what our Commander in Chief believes in, but I’m not asking anyone to take (an Obama decal) off their vehicle,” he said. “It’s a freedom of speech issue.”


“I’m not taking it off,” he said. “If they want to make me retire early that’s what I’ll do. But I’m not backing down.”

And luckily for the employees and for the sake of sanity, the military commander at Eglin saw no cause to fire the employees. He agreed that displaying a bumper sticker is legally protected speech under the First Amendment.

Union bosses didn’t want these men to just remove the stickers – they wanted these employees gone. People who display such intolerance have no desire to bridge the gap – they’re just angry people. I can think of a few people in this situation who deserve a pink slip. And they don’t support Phil.

5 Ways Liberal Race Hustling Is Bad For America

Leave a comment

This is from Town Hall.

The liberals only hope is to play the race card.

They cannot win in the arena of logic without using the charge of racism.



Calling someone a “racist” used to mean that a person disliked certain people because of their skin color.

Today, MOST OF THE TIME, it means something entirely different.

Now, if someone is better and smarter than a liberal, a liberal cries “white privilege.”

If a liberal is failing and he doesn’t know what to do about it, he yells “racism.”

If a liberal doesn’t know how to counter your argument, he calls it “racist.”

If liberal can’t counter your political argument, he screams out “bigot.”

So, if you’re conservative, it’s almost a backwards compliment at this point. “You’re just too good for me and this is the only way I know how to deal with it!”

Of course, it’s still irritating to be falsely accused of racism. Additionally, it does a lot of real damage to the country that’s just shrugged off and brushed aside by the shameless, selfish people who view crying “racism” as nothing more than a big political game.

1) It creates a victim mentality that turns people into losers: If you’re Hispanic or black and you really believe all the liberals who say America is hopelessly racist, why work hard, go to school, and try to get ahead? How are you going to make it in a society that’s 63.3% white, if all those white people are going to hate you for the color of your skin no matter what you say or do? How many black and Hispanic Americans have given up on making a good life for themselves and have settled for a mediocre life of dependency because they falsely believe that life in America is stacked against them?

2) It does more to promote real racism than the KKK: Most people, after being convinced that someone hates them, detest them back. If you’re black and you believe most white people are no different than George Wallace, Bull Connor, and Robert Byrd, why wouldn’t you be racist? If most black Americans were actually hateful, anti-white mooches like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who could blame white people for being racists? Liberals spend a lot of time trying to turn people against each other based on the color of their skin and they undoubtedly create racism in the process.

3) It has led to both political parties treating minority voters like an afterthought: Democrats get roughly 90% of the black vote and 70% of the Hispanic vote. In return for that incredible loyalty from important constituent groups, they call Republicans racist non-stop. Republicans respond to that by incessantly trying to prove that we’re not racist. What this means is that ultimately, neither party does anything of significance for minorities. Democrats feel like they have minority voters in the bag and Republicans feel like they will be branded as racists no matter what they do; so what motivation does any politician have to actually try to make the lives of their minority constituents better?

4) It takes the focus off of our real problems: Even if you think racism in America is a serious problem, it’s still small potatoes compared to the other challenges we face as a people. It doesn’t matter what color you’re talking about, how much of an impact does racism make versus jobs, crime, or out-of-wedlock births? Yet, we hear about racism incessantly because Democrats believe it helps them at the polls. Maybe it does. But, does it ever make anybody’s life better? Does it make any neighborhoods safer? Does it put people to work? Does it keep families together? Is there ever a point when the big issues impacting people’s lives get addressed or twenty years from now, is everyone still going to be mired in the same place, yelling at each other over the next “Trayvon” or “Donald Sterling?”

5) It creates the “Boy Who Cried Wolf” effect:One of the problems with crying “racism” every time someone criticizes Obama, knocks the Democrat Party, or just doesn’t do whatever liberals want him to do is that it masks real racism. Because of talentless wastes of space like Toure and Eugene Robinson whose whole careers revolve around pretending the world hasn’t changed since the sixties, minorities who are really discriminated against because of their skin color often have to overcome deep skepticism about their motives after they’ve been wronged. Just as false cries of “rape” hurt women, false cries of “racism” hurt minorities in this country.

Obama renews vow to ‘stamp out’ racism

1 Comment

This is from The Hill.

I will believe Obama is serious about racism when he denounces Al Sharpton,Jessie Jackson,Jeremiah Wright and himself.



President Obama marked the 60th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling by recommitting to “the long struggle to stamp out bigotry and racism in all their forms.”

On Friday at the White House, the president hosted lead attorneys, members of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and some relatives of the thirteen Topeka, Kan., families who sued over their school district’s racial segregation policies in the landmark 1954 civil rights case.

Obama said in a statement that the ruling was “the first major step in dismantling the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine that justified Jim Crow,” the racial segregation laws that were in place at the state and local level across the South.

“As we commemorate this historic anniversary, we recommit ourselves to the long struggle to stamp out bigotry and racism in all their forms,” Obama said. “We reaffirm our belief that all children deserve an education worthy of their promise. And we remember that change did not come overnight, that it took many years and a nationwide movement to fully realize the dream of civil rights for all of God’s children.”

First lady Michelle Obama marked the anniversary Friday by visiting Topeka, Kansas, the site of the lawsuit that sparked the case. In a rousing speech, the first lady told Kansas high school graduates they could keep the legacy of the Brown v. Board of Education decision alive by battling everyday racism, from stereotypes to hateful jokes.

“When you encounter folks who still hold the old prejudices because they’ve only been around folks like themselves, when you meet folks who think they know all the answers because they’ve never heard any other viewpoints, it is up to you to help them see things differently,” the first lady said.

Read more:
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”


This from Town Hall.



Racism used to mean hating someone because of his race.

No more.

Today, 99 times out of 100 in politics, the word “racist” is used purely for political reasons without any regard to whether something bigoted was actually said.

That doesn’t mean that racism doesn’t exist. It CERTAINLY DOES and sometimes it’s right out in the open, like the Left’s “Black Americans are way too stupid and incompetent to get voter ID like all the other races” canard. But, if we were to define “racism” as offensive statements about someone of another race that wouldn’t be automatically excused if Joe Biden, Harry Reid, or Bill Clinton said them, then there’s so little “racism” in politics that it’s barely worth mentioning.

Yet, the accusations of “racism” never seem to stop. Why? Because when liberals cry “racism,” they don’t really mean racism. They mean….

1) You disagree with me: “The Republican Party is racist.” “Sarah Palin is racist.” There’s a famous Tea Party sign that reads, “It doesn’t matter what this sign says. You’ll call it racism anyway!” Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. “Everybody” knows it. In other words, liberals believe they can’t be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be “racist” by default. It’s about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a “poopy head,” but it’s how they think.

2) I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people “racist.” Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn’t find enough things to call “racist,” they’d be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living.

3) Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election? Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can’t even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option.

4) You are disagreeing with a minority: The last thing any liberal wants is to argue an issue on its merits. Is it logical? Does it work? Is the benefit worth the cost? These things have NOTHING to do with why liberals support a position. So, one of the many ways they try to get people off track is to accuse any white person arguing with a minority of being racist. This is a neat trick, given that roughly 70% of Hispanic Americans and 90% of black Americans vote Democrat. Maybe Republicans should adopt this one and start accusing liberals who disagree with Allen West, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz of being racists.

5) Your attack is damaging us: When Republicans hit Democrats with any kind of damaging attack, it is inevitably called “racist.” For example, this is how former MSNBC host Martin Bashir could say something as crazy as,“Republicans are using [the IRS scandal] as their latest weapon in the war against the black man in the White House. ‘IRS’ is the new ‘N****r.’” It’s an attempt to shut Republicans up.

6) You won’t do what I want!: When you reward and encourage people who claim to be offended by trivia instead of laughing at them for being such pansies, it only encourages them to lash out more at people who hurt their precious feelings. Liberals who get their feelings hurt tend to respond by classifying the people who’ve egregiously offended them – by say, wearing a Redskins jersey, supporting lower taxes, or not voting for Obama — as horrible human beings. Maybe they’re part of the “patriarchy,” “sexists,” “homophobes” or “racists.” In all fairness, if Hillary Clinton were running for President, liberals would be screaming about sexism all the time. However, since Obama is ruining the country at the moment, calling someone a “racist” is their preferred way of whining that people won’t do what they want.

7) Stop trying to do outreach to black Americans: Democrats believe they own black Americans. That’s why they hate black Americans who don’t buy into that or white Republicans who want to do outreach. So, if a black Republican challenges the idea that black Americans are all helpless victims of racism who need crumbs from Democrats to survive, he’ll be racially insulted. If a white Republican like Paul Ryan starts doing some outreach that could conceivably appeal to black Americans, he will immediately be attacked as a racist. The Democrats are absolutely committed to keeping black Americans under their thumbs and anyone who challenges that will be treated as a threat.

25 Reasons To Dislike Liberals

1 Comment

This is from Right Wing News.


Is every liberal an immoral, nasty tempered, habitual liar who accuses people of racism for fun and trashes his own country because he thinks it makes him look sophisticated? Of course, not! On the other hand, is that a fairly accurate description of most liberals in politics? Yes, it is. Most of them aren’t evil per se, but as Margaret Thatcher said,

“Left-wing zealots have often been prepared to ride roughshod over due process and basic considerations of fairness when they think they can get away with it. For them the ends always seems to justify the means. That is precisely how their predecessors came to create the gulag.”

Liberals view themselves as good people because they’re liberals. People who are outside of that ugly little bit of circular reasoning don’t have such a benign view of their horrible behavior. So, what reason could you have to dislike liberals?


1) Only liberals would be cruel enough to pick on kids running lemonade stands with a permit, children putting on Christmas plays at school and the Boy Scouts

2) Because the closest thing to Sodom and Gomorrah in the modern world is San Francisco and Berkeley.

3) Whether you’re talking about cop killers, terrorists, radical Islamists or dictators, all you have to do is say, “I hate America,” and liberals start to sympathize with you.

4) Liberals are actually bothered by people who do love America. On the rare occasion when you do see a liberal waving a flag, look for a camera.

5) The same people who voted Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama into office think they’re smarter than tradition, the Founding Fathers and God Himself.

6) Liberals might not want to admit it, but the world would have been a better place if Mary Jo Kopechne had crawled up out of that car instead of Ted Kennedy.

7) Only an ass could like Bill Maher, Alan Grayson or Sheila Jackson Lee.

8) Liberals believe in taking money from people who earn it, handing it out as bribes in order to get more power and then using that power to hurt the people that are giving them money.

9) The same liberal who’ll laugh at a rape joke about Sarah Palin and then attack Michele Bachmann’s family will then turn around and accuse someone else of being sexist for respectfully noting that a woman is attractive.

10) Liberals view hooking people on welfare and food stamps as a core part of their election strategy, which is terrible for the country, shows they have no character and requires more than a little hatred for poor people.

11) The dumbest, most close-minded and mean spirited people in all of politics are inevitably liberals who are convinced they’re brilliant, open-minded and compassionate because they call themselves liberals.

12) A policy that makes liberals feel superior and caring that doesn’t work and wastes billions is considered a smashing success because they genuinely DON’T CARE WHETHER THEIR POLICIES ACTUALLY HELP PEOPLE OR NOT.

13) The same liberal who pretends to be angry about Susan Smith or Casey Anthony will then turn around and give the thumbs up to women who do the same thing to their children via abortion.

14) There’s a reason why the average homeschooled kid gets a better education than he would in a public school run by liberals. It’s because the kid’s parents are interested in educating him while his liberal teachers view public schools as just another way to indoctrinate children.

15) Noam Chomsky is an America-hating creep and to think of him as some kind of genius, you have to both despise our country enough to suspend your disbelief and be largely ignorant of world history.

16) Anyone whose first reaction after a terrorist attack is, “Why do they hate us?” is just an intolerable douche.

17) Liberals talk up Hillary Clinton as the most prominent and important female politician in America; yet her entire political career is based on the fact that she married Bill Clinton. That’s actually kind of pathetic.

18) Liberals have been big supporters of slavery, Indian massacres, the KKK, eugenics, fascism, communism and Jim Crow laws. Then, down the road, after liberals finally join everyone else, they try to claim that conservatives still support all the practices that we fought liberals on from the beginning.

19) Liberals think black Americans are inferior to whites, which is why the worst, most crime-ridden places to live in America are inevitably run by liberals. That’s acceptable to liberals because they don’t think black Americans deserve any better.

20) A liberal is more likely to support a man who murders a cop like Mumia Abu Jamal than cops who want to regularly patrol a bad neighborhood in force to keep the criminals from terrorizing the innocent people who live there.

21) The average middle aged Tea Partier who’s going to rallies, talking about the Constitution and calling for reduced spending cares more about “the children” than 99% of the liberals out there who demand that we support one stupid program after the other “for the children.”

22) You have to be a horrible human being to be okay with terrorists like Bill Ayers teaching kids at a college.

23) Because liberals are unable to ever admit they’re wrong, they systematically ruin and destroy everything they become involved with and then either point the finger elsewhere or demand even more government involvement to fix the problems they created.

24) Detroit – and, yes, liberals did that.

25) Even “liberal Christians” are generally supportive of other liberals who attack Christianity, which is why “liberal Christians” is in quotes.

Fla. House candidate: President Obama ‘should be hanged for treason’

Leave a comment

This is from The Washington Times.

While putting Obama on trial for treason the convicting and hanging him sounds good it will not happen.

The screams of racism would be on the lips of every race hustler in America.

A black Republican candidate for Florida House District 68 faced serious backlash Monday after he tweeted that he agreed with a statement that President Obama should be arrested and hanged.

Joshua Black tweeted “Agreed” to a statement by another Twitter user who wrote, “I’m past impeachment. It’s time to arrest and hang him high.”

Republican candidate for House District 67, Chris Latvala, was quick to condemn the comment, tweeting at Mr. Black: “You aren’t seriously calling for the killing of Obama are you? I know you are crazy but good heavens. U R an embarrassment.”

“Execution is the appropriate punishment for traitors,” Mr. Black responded. “Don’t you have a race? Don’t you have a primary? #MindYourOwnBusiness?”

“I make it my business when so called GOP candidates become an embarrassment to my beloved party,” Mr. Latvala replied. “You need to go take your medicine #TinFoilHat #Crazy.”

The Tampa Bay Times reported that Mr. Black, 31, moved to Florida in 2007 after practicing street evangelism in St. Louis and works as a taxi driver.

He later took to his Facebook page to clarify his controversial remarks.

“To everyone who was offended that I said that the POTUS should be hanged for treason … I make no apologies for saying that the President is not above the People. If ordinary Americans should be executed for treason, so should he,” the Republican said.

“So, don’t stop at impeachment. Remove him. Try him before a jury (the very right that he arbitrarily denied to al-Awaki and his 15-year-old son), and, upon his sure convictions, execute him. Thus has he done, thus it should be done to him,” he concluded.

Read more:
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: