FBI Failed to Inform Citizens They Were on an ISIS Kill List –

1 Comment

The Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement does not have an obligation to Protect and Serve.

The FBI did not alert numerous Americans that they were placed on secret Islamic State kill lists or notify their local police about the potential dangers, a lapse in the government’s efforts to combat the terrorist group’s evolving strategy to target everyday citizens.

Source: FBI Failed to Inform Citizens They Were on an ISIS Kill List – Girls Just Wanna Have Guns


Jeb Bush: Gay Marriage Isn’t a Constitutional Right Read Latest Breaking News


This is from NewsMax. 

There is not a lot I agree with Jeb Bush on in this case I agree with him.

The Sodomites do not need any special protections other than what the Constitution already provides.


Jeb Bush knows the way he would rule on same-sex marriage if he were a Supreme Court justice.

An an interview with Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody released Sunday, Bush was asked whether he believed that gay marriage was a right protected by the U.S. constitution.

Story continues below video.


“I don’t, but I’m not a lawyer, and clearly this has been accelerated at a warp pace,” he said.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule sometime next month on whether gay marriage should be made legal in all 50 U.S. states, and Bush tied the future of the country itself to the issue of the family structure.

“To imagine how we’re going to succeed in our country unless we have committed family life, a child-centered family system, is hard to imagine,” Bush said. “Irrespective of the Supreme Court ruling, because they’re going to decide whatever they decide, and I don’t know what they’re going to do, we need to be stalwart supporters of traditional marriage.”

In previous interviews, Bush has argued that same-sex marriage is something best left to the states to decide. In the interview, conducted Saturday morning in Iowa, however, he spoke about the issue in much more urgent, and moralistic terms.

“If we want to create a right-to-rise society, where people, particularly children born in poverty, if we want to have them have a chance we should be—a core American value,” Bush said, “we have to restore committed, loving family life with a mom and a dad loving their children with their heart and soul.”

In the wake of the nationwide controversy over so-called religious freedom laws, that critics argue allow for discrimination against same-sex couples, Bush was asked whether he thought it acceptable for business owners to refuse to provide services for a gay wedding.

Story continues below video.

“Yeah, absolutely,” Bush said. “If it’s based on a religious belief. The best example is the florist in Washington state who may lose her business because of this and has lost a lot because of the costs of all of this. She had a regular customer who came in and she would provide flowers to him and he was going to marry his significant other—asked her to participate as a friend in the wedding, to help organize it, and she thought about it and said, ‘look, I love you. You’re my friend, but I can’t participate. It goes against my conscience.'”

In the case Bush referenced, a superior court judge in Washington ruled in February that Baptist florist Barronelle Stutzman had violated the state’s anti-discrimination and consumer protection laws by citing her religious beliefs as her reason for not providing floral arrangements for a same-sex wedding.

“A big country, a tolerant country ought to be able to figure out the difference between discriminating against someone because of their sexual orientation and forcing someone to participate in a wedding that they find goes against their moral beliefs,” Bush said.

Read Latest Breaking News from
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!

Teacher: We’re Overwhelmed by Illegal Kids

1 Comment

This is from Rush

Obama is using The Cloward–Piven strategy to perfection.

Will anyone be able to end this madness before the system crashes?



RUSH: The headline of the story: “Schools Scramble to Help Teenagers Who Crossed the Border,” and I must warn you: The AP is not even calling them “undocumented migrants” anymore.

Now they are just “unaccompanied minors.”  It’s from Frankford, Delaware. “American schools are scrambling to provide services to the large number of children and teenagers who crossed the border alone in recent months. Unaccompanied minors…” As I say, they’re no longer “undocumented migrants,” no longer “illegal immigrant children.”  Nope. These are “unaccompanied minors who made up the summer spike at the border have moved to communities of all sizes, in nearly every state, Federal data indicates, to live with a relative and await immigration decisions.”

To live with relatives.

That’s the key to this.  At least they want us to think it’s the key.

“The Supreme Court has ruled that schools have an obligation to educate all students regardless of their immigration status, so schools have become a safe haven for many of the tens of thousands of these young people mostly from central America living in limbo.” They’re not in limbo.  They’re home free! That’s what’s happened here.  They’re not in limbo.  What is this limbo business?  They’re home free.  The taxpayers are gonna be paying through the nose for it.

What is this living in limbo business?  Does anybody really think they’re gonna be deported or sent back? My friends, they have been quickly dispatched. They are now fine. We’ve been told these unaccompanied minors have now been placed in homes in all 50 states, by design and on purpose.  They’re not in limbo anywhere.  It says here that these “students are eager but face barriers.” Do you know what the barriers are?

“Some can barely read or write in their native language,” much less English.  And yet they’re in our schools.  You know what this means?  It means time is going to have to be taken to accommodate them, who don’t even speak their own language or write it well.  These are gifts of love, of course.  This is what we’ve been told.  Gifts of love to the country! These kids’ parents have willingly given them way to America, as gifts — gifts of love.  They don’t need to be able to read or write.

Love doesn’t need real words!

Love doesn’t mean having to say you’re sorry.

Love doesn’t mean even having to know how to say you’re sorry.

Now, in Frankford, Delaware, “The district’s goal is to get them assimilated — and eventually into a regular high school. There, they can earn a diploma, even if that means participating in adult education programs and going to school until they are 21,” and, might I add, all for free. Likewise, their school meals and their meals at home and their housing and their medical treatment and their transportation and their flat-screen TVs, eventually their cell phones. All free.

“Donald Hattier, a school board member, said advance warning would have helped with planning. The federal government, he said, ‘just dropped this on us.’ He wonders what’s next. ‘The kids are still coming across the border. This problem has not been solved,’ Hattier said.” That’s right, it hasn’t.  They’ve just stopped reporting on it but the exodus or the whatever you want to call it, does continue, because what’s really going on is the future of the Democrat Party is wrapped up in this.

These are simply young, unregistered future Democrat voters.


RUSH: Now we’re back to Renee in Gainesville, Georgia.  My question to you, you’re still there, right?

CALLER:  Yes, I’m still here.

RUSH:  Thank you. Now, you’ve got eight in a classroom in this one school in Gainesville. You have a hundred students who are being taught survival phrases, not even being educated the way the other students are.  What’s happening to the education of the other kids while all this is going on?  That’s my question.

CALLER:  Well, these students, it’s my understanding, are in self-contained classrooms. So they’re not being mixed with the general population of students, even other students that speak Spanish. It’s my understanding they’re not being assimilated or mainstreamed, to use education lingo. They are being taught separately and they’re at a school location that houses the alternative school and a special education branch of the school and some things like that. So they’re not at the high school where all the other kids are.

RUSH:  Well, thank goodness for that.  I mean, I would hate — I’m glad they’re being segregated in that regard because this would be a disaster if they were being integrated with the rest of the kids here who are trying to learn the traditional subjects:  reading, writing, mathematics, whatever, history, and all of a sudden that stops while the undocumented minors are being taught survival phrases.  So at least they’re being segregated.  But the schools can’t be prepared for this.

CALLER:  They’re not.  They absolutely are not.  The teachers are doing the best they can, and they’re taking classes on teaching English language learners. But it’s still very difficult, especially, you know, teenagers are a difficult age to teach regardless, even when they speak your language. So the language barrier, in addition to just the normal teenage resistance to authority, I can imagine it’s not a very fun process on some days.

RUSH:  Now, I’m trying to put myself inside one of these schools.  One day, while things are going normal, and I’ve got the usual student body in there and they’re all in their various classrooms and they’re learning whatever they’re learning or they’re trying to. Then all of a sudden you’ve got maybe two or three, the next day four or five, the next day seven or so of these kids that have crossed the border illegally, who don’t speak English, who can’t read or write their own language, basically can’t communicate with ‘em, how do they even show up?  I mean, who’s taking them to school?  They don’t know where the school is.  Who’s bringing them?  What is the expectation when they show up?  Who is telling the school what they have to do with these kids?

CALLER:  Those are all very good questions that I don’t really know the answer to.

RUSH:  Well, there has to be some kind of system or policy in place, because otherwise the people that run these schools would be pulling their hair out.  “What do we do here?”  So they have to find a classroom to put these people in by themselves ’cause their learning curve is an entirely different process, and there’s nobody there that speaks their language, or very few.

CALLER:  Right.  I know the initial teacher who

RUSH:  Are there pictures of Obama in this classroom where these kids are?

CALLER: (laughing)

RUSH:  Pictures of Obama and Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton? And is there a voter registration form in there?

CALLER:  All with halos, of course.

RUSH:  (laughing)  All with halos.  You’re good.  Renee, you got a great sense of humor.  Look, I’m glad you called.  I appreciate it.  I’m trying to imagine what that would be like.  You’re a principal, vice principal, a teacher, and everything’s going along as it always does, and then one day here’s a new arrival of four or five, whatever number, and it just keeps growing, and I’m surprised they even have room.  We keep hearing about how overcrowded schools are.  Anyway, Renee, thank you again.  I appreciate it.


Family-Run Business Tells Supreme Court: Stop Obama’s HHS Mandate

Leave a comment

This is from LifeNews.

I pray the Supreme Court gets their ruling right on this matter.

No one should be forced by the Obama regime to violate their

Religious convictions.

A family-run business filed papers with the Supreme Court today telling the high court that it must stop the “unjust” Obamcare mandate that requires companies to pay for birth control and abortion-causing drugs for their employees.

This is the companion case to the legal challenge the Supreme Court accepted from Hobby Lobby.

Alliance Defending Freedom and allied attorneys representing a Pennsylvania Mennonite family and its woodworking business filed their opening brief with the U.S. Supreme Court Friday in one of two major legal challenges to the Obama administration’s abortion pill mandate that the high courtagreed in November to hear.

“Unjust laws are not valid laws. The government shouldn’t be allowed to punish Americans for exercising their constitutionally protected freedoms,” said Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel David Cortman. “The administration has no business whatsoever forcing citizens to choose between making a living and living free.”

“Job creators don’t give up their fundamental freedoms when they get a business license,” added Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “Every American has a right to fully and freely participate in every area of public life.”

The Hahns are Mennonite Christians in Pennsylvania who asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review their case, Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled 2-1 against them. The decision conflicts with most other circuits and with the vast majority of rulings on the mandate so far.

The brief filed Friday explains that the Obama administration’s “argument is inconsistent with the reality of religious activity in Americans’ daily lives. There is no separating the Hahns’ faith from their business or its actions. The members of the Hahn family, as Mennonite Christians, practice their faith in everything they do, including the running of their business…. The Mandateforces them to choose between violating their religious convictions and incurring ruinous fines and lawsuits. No compelling interest justifies imposing such a Hobson’s choice, particularly given the government’s exclusion of thousands of other employers from the Mandate’s scope.”

“If the government can force Americans to violate their deepest, most heartfelt convictions, there’s no stopping what government can do. If freedom of conscience isn’t preserved, then all of our freedoms are in jeopardy,” said co-counsel Randall Wenger, chief counsel of the Independence Law Center.

The mandate could cost the family $95,000 per day if it doesn’t agree to live contrary to its Christian convictions, according to 3rd Circuit Judge Kent Jordan’s dissent in the case. The mandate forces employers, regardless of their religious or moral convictions, to provide insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception under threat of heavy financial penalties if the mandate’s requirements aren’t met.

The Supreme Court has set the date for oral arguments for Hobby Lobby’s challenge to the Obama HHS mandate. The nation’s highest court will hear debate from attorneys representing the Christian-owned business and the Obama administration on Tuesday, March 25 at 10 a.m.

The Obama administration is attempting to make it comply with the HHS mandate that compels religious companies to pay for birth control and abortion-causing drugs for their employees. However, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a landmark case addressing the Constitutionally guaranteed rights of business owners to operate their family companies without violating their deeply held religious convictions. This is good news to the Green family, who own the store.

“This is a major step for the Greens and their family businesses in an important fight for Americans’ religious liberty,” said Kyle Duncan, general counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and lead lawyer for Hobby Lobby. “We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will clarify once and for all that religious freedom in our country should be protected for family business owners like the Greens.”

The Obama administration says it is confident it will prevail, saying, “We believe this requirement is lawfuland are confident the Supreme Court will agree.”

A December 2013 Rasmussen Reports poll shows Americans disagree with forcing companies like Hobby Lobby to obey the mandate.

“Half of voters now oppose a government requirement that employers provide health insurance with free contraceptives for their female employees,” Rasmussen reports.

The poll found: “The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 38% of Likely U.S. Voters still believe businesses should be required by law to provide health insurance that covers all government-approved contraceptives for women without co-payments or other charges to the patient.

Fifty-one percent (51%) disagree and say employers should not be required to provide health insurance with this type of coverage. Eleven percent (11%) are not sure.”

%d bloggers like this: