Advertisements
Home

BREAKING: HILLARY EMAIL FOUND SHOWING INSTRUCTIONS FOR KILLING CHRIS STEVENS

2 Comments

H/T Conservative Daily Post. 

Hillary Clinton and Bathhouse Barry should be side by cells awaiting  execution for the murders Ambassador Chris Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Sean Smith. 

Hillary Allowed Amb. Stevens’ Exact Location To Be Revealed

Hillary Allowed Amb. Stevens’ Exact Location To Be Revealed

Hillary Clinton has been destroyed with email hacks and document leaks for nearly two months now, and she will be waking up this morning to another one. In an email released Monday regarding Hillary’s Benghazi investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens. Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message.

There were five relevant emails in the cache of Clinton emails that placed Amb. Stevens in harms way:

  • March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
  • March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
  • April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
  • April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
  • April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”
  • Hillary Called Him Chris Smith, She Didn’t Even Know His Name

    Hillary Called Him Chris Smith, She Didn’t Even Know His Name

    Read the email closely. It begins at the bottom with Hillary (H) writing in the subject line “Chris Smith.” Yes, Chris Smith was one of the Americans that was also killed, but it shows that the wrong name remained in the email chain. No one corrected it. And no one can argue that they were focused on “the situation,” because if they truly were, they would never have revealed his location 5 separate times in unsecured emails. Clinton claims to have been deeply affected by the death of an American Ambassador, yet she can’t even remember what his name is? Hillary allowed Benghazi to happen, she placed everyone at risk with her incompetence, and she is to blame for why he cannot go home to his family.

    The emails above are from a chain of emails that reveal Ambassador Stevens‘ location was readily available to anyone who could hack into Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email server. Which, according to the FBI, was not very hard to do. It is very possible that these emails were intercepted, but Hillary failed these Americans several times. She failed them when she declined to adequately supply and arm them when they requested it for months, she never answered their requests for help that night for 13 hours, and she still to this day lies about how she left our Americans exposed to an attack. She didn’t care then, and she never will. But we do. Here’s an awesome tribute video to Amb. Chris Stevens:

 

 

It is possible that we will never know whether terrorists intercepted the emails on Hillary’s non-secure personal server, especially given how many programs Clinton has used to wipe her server clean, but we do see a pattern here and the American people are not believing the lies she continues to spew. To make things worse, we know she doesn’t care. The mere fact that she is willing to put her own electoral chances above the lives of four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador, should tell you all you need to know about her.

And remember this: the Democrats rigged the election FOR her, it isn’t like they got stuck with her. She was their choice, they championed her as their nominee. So that speaks to many Democrats and reveals how corrupt and dishonest the entire party is. It’s time for America to stand up and say no. The time has come for us all to unite, and put an end to the Clinton Cartel before it is too late. Please like and share on Facebook if you agree that Hillary Clinton deserves to go to jail for her private email server, what she has done to this country, and for leaving Americans to die that night in Benghazi. Scroll down to comment below!

 

Advertisements

Tyrone Woods’ Widow Has a Sharp Response for Hillary About ‘What Difference Does It Make?’

2 Comments

H/T Independent Journal Review.

These ads about Benghazi and other things Crooked Hillary has been involved in.

She lost her husband – Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods – in Benghazi in 2012, but for the last four years Dr. Dorothy Woods has stayed away from the media spotlight.

However, Woods has stepped out of the shadows in recent weeks to speak out against Hillary Clinton and lend her support to Donald Trump:

Woods spent an hour on Friday speaking to WMAL’s “Drive at Five” host Larry O’Connor discussing her late husband, Hillary Clinton, and her decision to support Republican nominee Donald Trump. She minced no words.
On Clinton’s now-famous “What difference, at this point, does it make?” sound-bite, Woods had this to say:

“Hillary Clinton talked about protesters and people who were just out for a walk, but the intent makes a difference. There’s a difference if they were premeditating and killing them. The intent of the person who killed them DOES make a difference.

The people who died in Benghazi, and the people who survived – they were there for a purpose. They weren’t on vacation. She can’t say ‘what difference does it make?’ those were her people, and that’s her job to answer those questions.”
Woods — a veteran herself — also explained why she believes Hillary Clinton never tried to push the narrative of the video and protest on her individually:

“I don’t think Hillary fed me the story about the video because I was surrounded by SEALs and other military friends who maybe would have known better. She knew I wasn’t a…civilian…so she wasn’t going to go there, perhaps.”
Woods was also dismayed at President Obama’s response to the loss of American lives, saying that it called into question where his true allegiances were:

“When I heard our president say, ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,’ it made me wonder whose side he’s on. He doesn’t defend us – he doesn’t say ‘Americans are great, Christians are great’ – I never hear him say those things, so I wonder what side he’s on.”
But despite the fact that Woods does not claim that Hillary Clinton lied directly to her, she does hold the former Secretary of State responsible for her husband’s death. And for that reason, she says she cannot vote for Clinton:

“I will not be voting for Hillary Clinton. She has demonstrated her decision-making and lack of decision-making skills, and the outcome was death.”
Instead, Woods says she will be supporting Trump because “he deserves a chance to prove himself.”

Hillary Clinton: ‘We Didn’t Lose A Single Person’ In Libya [VIDEO]

Leave a comment

This is from The Daily Caller.

   Sadly, Ambassador Chris Stevens, State Department information officer Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were unavailable for comments.        

Hillary Clinton defended on Monday her push for regime change in Libya while she served as secretary of state, telling MSNBC’s Chris Matthews the U.S. “didn’t lose a single person” in the North African country.

But the Democratic presidential candidate appears to have forgotten about the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks that left dead Ambassador Chris Stevens, State Department information officer Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

Clinton was one of the most ardent voices for invading Libya and deposing its dictator, Col. Moammar Gaddafi. The New York Times recently reported in detail how Clinton helped convince an ambivalent President Obama to enforce a no-fly zone in Libya and to support rebel forces.

Matthews asked Clinton how she could support regime change in Libya while now opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Libya was a different kind of calculation, and we didn’t lose a single person,” she said in defending her apparently conflicting positions.

Two elections have been held in Libya since Gaddafi’s ouster, Clinton pointed out. But she did not acknowledge that ISIS has gained more power in the majority Muslim nation.

WATCH:

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/14/hillary-clinton-we-didnt-lose-a-single-person-in-libya-video/#ixzz432MmQUhX

Hillary Emails Betrayed Whereabouts of Murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens

1 Comment

This is from Breitbart.

If this is true Hillary should be arrested and tossed into jail.

Then be put on trial for her role in causing Ambassador Christopher Stevens death and the deaths of Sean Smith,Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

An email containing the whereabouts and plans of murdereU.S.Ambassador Chris Stevens passed through Hillary Clinton’s private server, dispatches released Monday in the final group of messages from Clinton’s emails reveal.

The email was actually first released last May but was contained in Monday’s batch as well, serving as a reminder that numerous emails sent to Clinton’s private address betrayed Stevens’ location while he was stationed in arguably one of the most dangerous zones in the world for an American diplomat.

The email in question was written Sunday, April 10, 2011 by State employee Timmy Davis and sent to the State email addresses of other employees, including Clinton’s then-foreign policy aide, Jacob Sullivan and Clinton’s senior aide.

Abedin forwarded the message to Clinton. At the time, Stevens was the U.S. envoy to the Libyan rebels.

The dispatch read:

The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc). He will monitor the situation to see if it deteriorates further, but no decision has been made on departure. He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure.

The email is one of several giving away Stevens’ location and movements.

A March 27, 2011 email released last year was titled, “Chris Stevens mission.” It divulged: “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage offshore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”

An April 8, 2011 email was forwarded to Clinton revealing the “security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”

An April 22, 2011 email revealed Stevens was on the road: “I want to let you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has been in Benghazi since April 5.”

An April 24, 2011 email has the exact time of a Stevens meeting: “”Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa,but that is some way off.”

 

 

Glen Doherty,Tyrone Woods Your Not Forgotten

Leave a comment

Hat Tip Opus #6 @American Perspective

Never Forget Benghazi!!

1 Comment

Never Forget the four men Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton left to be murdered in Benghazi,

Ambassador Christopher Stevens,Sean Smith,Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

 

Phony Scandals? Here’s a Letter From Uncle Billy

1 Comment

This is from Joe For America.

The scandals are real Obama is the phony.

 

Liberals insist that the conservative movement of 2010 was phony; that it was “Astroturf” as they called it. The 2012 Presidential election may have emboldened them, but we didn’t show up and neither did they. We just didn’t show up a lot more and lost. Maybe conservatives, Tea Party groups, Christians and pro-Israel Jews were intimidated by the Federal government’s attack on their civil liberties and that made a big impact, but now they’ve been exposed. A lot has happened since the election: Evidence in the Benghazi cover-up and Fast & Furious program has come to light; the IRS fiasco is closing in on the White House; The Department of Justice is spying on the press; Homeland Security is buying up all the weapons and ammo while Liberals continue to try to deny citizens their right to bear arms; the NSA wants to watch, listen and store everything you say and have the green light to send a drone to finish the job.

Phony scandals, Mr. President? Tell that to the families of Brian Terry, Chris Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Sean Smith. You send your gutless mouthpiece out there to say those words as these brave people lay in the ground thanks to your actions and inaction.  And all for what – votes? I’ll tell you what phony is – it’s taking a trial not worth even trying and inventing a national spectacle for the sheer purpose of turning Americans against each other. You and that corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder – a man who lies so often he probably doesn’t know the difference anymore.

I’m going to let a real American – a man among millions who have had enough of this – a lot of whom you will hear from in 2014, by the way. No Astroturf needed. It may be a little raw, but he doesn’t use consultants, writers, or a TelePrompTer. He just lets it fly.

A letter from my uncle Billy:
—-

Subject: enough
Date: 7/24/2013 10:16:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Great time to vent, except my opinion, I’m sure, only has importance to me.

I’ve had a belly full of this Trayvon crap.  The trial was ONLY (period, only!!!!!!) about answering the question, “Was George acting in self-defense?”  It wasn’t about race, name calling, trespassing, stand your ground, following too closely or any of the other myriad of actions that may or may not have occurred.  The trial was about the 5 seconds when George felt he was gonna get hurt and decided to try and avoid that.  The jury decided that based on the evidence, he was justified.  That’s it.  End of discussion.  Now the Al “not so Sharp”- tons of the world are blowing it up to create even further division among the races.  Bite me.  Score is 1 to 1.  You guys won the O.J. Simpson thing.

The races are genetically different, otherwise there would not be black and white.  They can now map my genes and tell me that I have Native American blood and even get close to the culture (i.e., Iroquoian)/tribe.  They can tell a black guy what part of Africa he is from and most likely his tribal affiliation.  Fact is there are behavioral characteristics embedded in those genes.  These create the thing we call culture.  The pundits want to ignore culture and they are just sticking their head in the sand.

Black and white are different and will stay that way.  Scotch-Irish are known to be strong willed and independent.  Germans are inventive & industrious.  The circles all intersect, but, they are not, and never will be, congruent.  Think about red apples, green apples and yellow apples all in a bowl.  One ain’t never gonna become the other.  And, we aren’t going to reallocate space in the bowl (metaphor for wealth) based on apple color.  It is what it is.  The only hope is to try to get along.  Bottom line is I don’t have to be politically correct and further, I don’t care.  I miss the 50′s and I hate Facebook.

And poor Paula Deen, even if she is a Democrat.  She said the N word 30 years ago and gets crucified.  Martha Stewart went to jail and her actions seem considerably worse to me than what Paula did and it doesn’t appear to have hurt her career. There is someone in my household who used the N word multiple times a day after she lived in East St. Louis in 1964. So great a place they decided to list it as an All American City, but the troubles started right after that.  Neighborhoods were integrated, which was OK with my wife, she liked everybody and they liked her.  Then the block buster’s came in.  These block busters were not nice people with educations and who worked hard.  These were “community organizers” who were motivated through jealousy, malice and hate.

The community of folks who moved into these homes were not the upwardly mobile George Jeffersons.  These people were on the bottom rungs of the ladder and apparently wanted to stay there.  Home prices bottomed out.  Crime became rampant.  Her house was broken into twice.  It was no longer safe to take her kids to the park.  Her husband, at the time, was a fire fighter who was often away at night.  She was at home with two small kids and had to go to the door with a 22 pistol in hand actually running a guy off who tried to kick in her door.

The good folks who lived there, both black and white, abandoned the neighborhood.  They finally gave the house away and moved to an apartment in a nearby city with a safe environment.  Does she have a bad taste in her mouth?  Does she stereotype when she sees black kids with hoodies and low rider pants?  Damn right she does and with good reason.  It is not prejudice, it is called experiential learning.

Bill
—-

The author of these words can’t be labeled I don’t believe, at least not by myself. I only know I didn’t write these words, nor could I have written them because they come from actual experiences and emotions, not from my imagination or observation of events. What’s going on today in Washington D.C is a blatant and atrocious effort to get a large group of Americans to hate folks like Uncle Billy and his wife and push them around. Ironically, this hatred and vitriol is being spread by a community organizer and his lapdogs in the media, all of whom despise real Americans.

2014 is just around the corner. Get off your ass and help me and Uncle Billy.

 

Three Months Later: No Justice, Unanswered Questions on Benghazi

1 Comment

This is from Town Hall.

Of course they will not be any answers.

There is nothing to see here.

Just move on you racists.

 

Three months ago today, President Obama woke up to the news that US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans had been murdered during a terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi.  The president had been informed that an active attack was underway the night before — but how actively he followed the developing raid, and what (if any) orders he issued, remains a mystery.  On September 12, the president skipped his daily intelligence briefing and flew to Las Vegas for a campaign rally.  This much we know.  The Obama campaign eventually accused Republicans of “politicizing” the massacre by asking questions about it, asserting that the “entire reason” it was a major national story was due to rank exploitation of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.  Even with the president’s re-election safely tucked away, the White House has continued to defend its UN Ambassador (and possible Secretary of State in waiting) against charges that she dissemminated false information to mislead the public about the true nature of the deadly attack.  The president and his top lieutenants have repeatedly dodged difficult questions, changed their stories, and hidden behind the dubious fig leaf of “ongoing investigations.”  Obama has vowed to track down those responsible for the atrocities and bring them to justice.  He has also stated his desire to find out exactly what happened in Benghazi that night.  The federal investigation into the attacks got off to a stupefyingly dreadfulstart, and three months later, justice and accountability remain in short supply:

Three months after Ambassador Christopher Stevens, a diplomat and two CIA contractors were murdered in Benghazi, there is no sign of the killers being brought to justice by the United States. The investigation into the attacks has been hampered by the reluctance of the Libyan authorities to move against the Islamist terrorists identified by the FBI as responsible for the killing, according to American officials briefing the ‘New York Times’. None of the suspects has been arrested or killed and some have fled Libya. Last month, the FBI issued a global appeal asking anyone with information about the killers to send information in an e-mail, text message or via Facebook. Stevens, the first U.S. ambassador to be killed in the line of duty since 1979, diplomat Sean Smith and CIA contractors and former U.S. Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, were killed in an attack on the U.S. consultate in Benghazi on September 11. The following day, President Barack Obama vowed: ‘Make no mistake, justice will be done.’But that promise may remain unfulfilled if there is not more cooperation from the Libyan authorities.

The White House and its allies now insist that most questions on Benghazi have already been asked and answered — a claim that even some members of the mainstream media are finding hard to swallow.  Here’s a question: Is this report accurate?

A source with personal knowledge of the security situation in Benghazi told Breitbart News thatSenators who listened to closed door testimony about the Benghazi attack were shocked to learn State Department security personnel agents were not immediately armed. Additionally, agents separated from Ambassador Chris Stevens left to retrieve their M4 weapons in a separate building. Only one returned to protect the Ambassador, while the other two hunkered down in the barracks, the source relayed. “From the accounts I read, those guys were not ready. When the attack came that night, they had to go back to the other room and grab their weapons. Then the worse part about it was they never even returned to be with the Ambassador. One returned to be with the Ambassador with his rifle … There were no shots fired in return. On the embassy property, just the embassy property, none of those security agents blasted a single bullet from a single pistol or rifle at all in defense of the Ambassador—nothing.”

We already knew that the security situation at the consulate was woefully inadequate, but this is the first we’ve heard about zero shots being fired in the ambassador’s defense (which is not to be confused with the subsequent, prolonged firefight at the CIA safehouse).  Jay Carney may not be able to think of a single question on Benghazi that hasn’t been sufficiently addressed, but I certainly can.  Here are a dozen relevant and important inquiries, just off the top of my head:

(1) Who, specifically, denied repeated requests for increased security resources and personnel from American officials on the ground in Libya?  Why were these requests shot down?

(2) A senior State Department official testified that the US had the “correct” number of security assets in Benghazi. Amb. Susan Rice stated that our security presence at the Benghazi mission was “substantial.”  Does the president stand by those assessments?  If not, why were they made in the first place?

(3)  Why were US security personnel pulled out of Libya, even as Amb. Stevens warned of heightened risks?

(4) Why was the Benghazi consulate operating below the bare minimum standards for a US diplomatic compound, especially after our government learned that at least ten known Islamist militias were operating in the city?

(5) Why wasn’t security beefed up after a series of attacks on western targets in Benghazi, including previous attempted bombings at the American consulate itself?

(6) Where was the president during the raid itself?  How closely did he follow what was happening, and for how long?

(7) Was the president made aware of the numerous desperate pleas for help from two former SEALs, who battled the terrorists for seven hours before being killed?  If not, why not?  If so, what was his response?

(8) Which government officials, specifically, watched the attack unfold in real time — hour after excruciating hour — via footage from an American drone?  Was that drone armed?

(9) Why were American forces and resources not deployed to help defeat the enemy, particularly while several Americans were alive and urgently seeking reinforcements?  Why was a key counterterrorism task force not convened during the attack?

(10) Who, specifically, changed Susan Rice’s public talking points by excising references to Al Qaeda, and why?  If there was a national security concern, what was it?  Where did the inaccurate “spontaneous protest” narrative originate?  Why was that story deemed more fit for publication than the accurate terrorism evidence?  And if Rice had little direct knowledge of the facts on the ground in Benghazi, why was she selected as the administration’s spokesperson on the subject?

(11) Why was the president still publicly hedging on the terrorism question several weeks after the attack, especially if a terrorist link had been established “almost immediately.”

(12) Why did it take the FBI weeks to arrive at the unsecured, bombed-out consulate after the attack?  Why were sensitive documents left in the rubble, even after they’d left?  Without jeopardizing any leads, what — if any — progress has been made in identifying, capturing, or killing those responsible for the assault?

Three months later, the American people and the families of the fallen still deserve answers.

Heroic

1 Comment

This is by Charlie Daniels in CNSNews.

Charlie has so high praise for former Navy Seal Tyrone Woods.

Tyrone’s bravery is typical of our military’s special forces.

 

A very brave man died in the recent fiasco in Libya that killed an American ambassador and four other Americans. Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was not ordered into the fray, but rather defied his superiors who ordered him to stand down and not to go and assist the Americans who were pinned down and under siege at a diplomatic compound a short distance from where he was.

Woods went and rescued people who had apparently been left to fend for themselves by the military, the State Department, the CIA and the White House. Tyrone Woods gave his life in service of a nation whose president downgraded the deadly attack to a protest and promptly flew off to Las Vegas for a fundraising event.

While Obama and his minions insisted the intelligence they were receiving at the time claimed the attack was a spontaneous offshoot of a street protest staged by Muslims against some obscure film, which was disrespectful of Mohammed, a slaughter was going on in Benghazi.

The calls for help from the Ambassador and those with him were ignored by everybody high enough in the Obama administration to do anything about it and would have gone completely unheeded had it not been for this lone Navy SEAL, who saw his duty and did it.

People, this is totally disgraceful, and exposes the incompetence of a presidential administration that is totally out of sync, out of line and out of control. For a firefight that cost four American lives to go on for seven hours and nobody, except one rank and file Navy SEAL, has the good sense and courage to do something about it. And his Commander in Chief flies away to Las Vegas on Air Force One without even having the decency to say it was a terrorist attack, should anger everyone who calls themselves an American.

Our nation and our future are in the hands of a man who refuses to take the blame for anything. He inherited the bad economy and four years later has only made it worse. He knew nothing about Fast and Furious and issues an executive order to prevent the congress from getting to the bottom of it and now he is completely innocent of not sending help to Americans dying at the hands of Islamic terrorists in a firefight that lasted 7 hours.

Well, if Obama is not responsible, please tell me who is.

A president is supposed to be a leader, a father figure who accepts the blame for everything that happens under his administration. He is responsible for the caliber of people he puts in decision making positions, it is his responsibility to stay informed to have staff who are savvy enough to know when something is important enough to be brought to his immediate attention. It is his duty to stay in Washington monitoring and managing any situation that endangers America and American lives, not flitting off to fund raisers and making frivolous television appearances.

Our nation is being run by a kindergarten class of petulant, pass the buck, politically correct, “its all America’s fault”, political juveniles with no practical experience, no sense of responsibility and no leader.

We are in one hell of a mess.

My deepest condolences to the family of Navy SEAL, Tyrone Woods, a hero who exemplified the highest calling of a warrior who truly cared about his fellow man.

Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

– John 15:13

What do you think?

Pray for our troops, and for our country.

God Bless America

Charlie Daniels

 

Father of ex-SEAL: Those who denied request for help at consulate ‘murderers of my son’

1 Comment

This is from Fox News Politics.

Charles Woods needs to know who denied the calls for help.

Slow Joe’s remarks to Charles Woods goes beyond crude.

Slow Joe’s remarks were vulgar and uncalled for.

The father of a former Navy SEAL killed in the Libya terror attack last month said Friday that U.S. officials who denied a request for help while the diplomatic compound in Benghazi was under attack “are murderers of my son.”

Charles Woods was reacting to accounts by Fox News sources that a request from the CIA annex for backup was denied by U.S. officials. His son, Tyrone Woods, was killed in the Sept. 11 assault.

“They refused to pull the trigger,” Woods said. “Those people who made the decision and who knew about the decision and lied about it are murderers of my son.”

Woods said he forgives whoever denied the apparent request, but he urged them to “stand up.”

Sources also said Tyrone Woods and others, who were at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate, ignored orders by their superiors to stand down and not go to the consulate to help. Woods went to the consulate, and hours later he was killed back at the annex.

Charles Woods said his son’s action “does not surprise me.”

“I wish that the leadership in the White House had the same level of moral courage and heroism that my son displayed,” he said.

Woods, in interviews earlier this week, also described a series of conversations he had with administration officials at the memorial service held Sept. 14. He said that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — despite signs early on that militants were behind the attack — pledged to him at that event that she would pursue the maker of an anti-Islam film that had been linked to other protests.

“Her countenance was not good and she made this statement to me … she said we will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted,” he said on radio host Glenn Beck’s online show, adding that she also apologized.

Woods said he “could tell that she was not telling me the truth.”

The account shows an apparent disconnect between evidence that extremists were involved in the attack — including a newly released State Department email on the day of the attack saying the militant Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility — and the desire by some to focus strictly on the film as the cause.

The State Department on Friday reiterated that the administration is committed to seeking justice for those responsible.

“Since the moment they were first given the terrible news of their loss, through that very difficult day when they witnessed the return of the remains of their loved ones, and every day since, the families of those killed have been a top priority of the department,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner said Friday. “And everything is being done to bring to justice those responsible for their deaths.”

Clinton and the rest of the administration made repeated reference to the video in their public comments in the days after the attack. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice said on Sept 16 the attack was a “spontaneous” reaction to demonstrations over the video. The administration even funded an ad in Pakistan condemning the video.

Intelligence officials have since given a mixture picture, saying the strike was a coordinated terror attack — but also leaving open the door to the possibility that militants reacted opportunistically to the protests in Egypt at the time over the film.

Woods also described encounters on Sept. 14 with Vice President Biden and President Obama.

He claimed that at one point, Biden came over to him and said, “in an extremely loud and boisterous voice, ‘did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?'”

Woods said in the Beck interview: “I will ask you the question, is that the voice of someone who is truly sorry?”

In a separate interview with radio host Lars Larson, Woods said shaking Obama’s hand was “like shaking hands with a dead fish.”

Woods said: “He kind of just mumbled, you know, ‘I’m sorry.’ His face was looking at me, but his eyes were looking over my shoulder like he could not look me in the eye. And it was not a sincere, ‘I’m really sorry, you know, that you’re son died,’ but it was totally insincere.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/father-seal-killed-in-libya-says-clinton-vowed-to-arrest-and-prosecute/?intcmp=trending#ixzz2AR543oBv

 

 

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: